To be fair, he was given so little to work with in Thor 2. I was really looking forward to him being in that film, and he barely registered. MCU films always had weak villains, but don't go waste enormously talented actors in them, please!
Yeah. Although Hugo Weaving & Mads Mikkelsen made a little bit more of a meal out of it than Eccleston did.
'During the first block of filming' was July-October 2004, when Episodes 1-6 were shot pretty much simultaneously. So it sounds like things went to shit basically from day one, with Eccleston either unable or unwilling to play the Doctor the way RTD and the BBC wanted - that is, the way Tennant would eventually play him.
Funny because I often feel like Eccleston & Tennant are the 2 most similar Doctors out of any in the entire history of the series. Eccleston was a bit darker & more wounded than Tennant but I think he had to be because that was right after the Time War. I figure that Eccleston's Doctor would have mellowed in a similar fashion had he lasted longer on the show.
Is this why BBC America skips season 1 in its previous show repeats? It goes from Season 2 to the latest and then back to Season 2 like Season 1 never happened.
I figured it's because the cameras & lighting during the 1st season were shite. Granted, they were pretty shite during Season 2 as well, but maybe Tennant is just popular enough to justify re-airing those.
If it has to do with Eccleston's residuals, that might also make sense. IIRC, Eccleston got paid more than any other Doctor has. Even by the end of Tennant's run, he was still making less than Eccleston got.
If he was going to do more than one season, why did they shoot and use a regen? It took up a fair bit of his last ep. Also, IMO, it meant RTD could hit all the points he needed to: TARDIS, companion, time travel, deep space, Gallifrey, Time Lords, and finally, regeneration. Everything you need to know about the Doctor, everything, is in that first series.
No deep space in Season 1. Every episode in Season 1 is in our solar system. In fact, the first time they substantially got away from either Earth or New Earth was in late Season 2 in "The Impossible Planet."
Still, Eccleston's contract did include an option for returning for a second year, which he was at one point considering. And indeed, many of the season 2 writers initially didn't realize they were writing for a new Doctor. Indeed, Moffat admitted when he wrote Girl in the Fireplace, he believed he was writing for Eccleston.
Probably the Season 2 episode that feels the most Eccleston-ish is "School Reunion," particularly with just how much of a jerk the Doctor is towards Mickey.
Ten was definitely the ‘Ladies Choice’ doctor lol.
My sister would agree.
He actually asked the audience if he's right in thinking Tom was the only Doctor to get it immediately right and if everyone else was better in their second year. Which is where he wishes he'd had the chance to do a second year to get it right, especially the comedy he'd not played at that level before.
For the most part, I think that most Doctors get better as they go on. William Hartnell was a little too curt in his first few stories but pretty well hit his stride by mid-Season 1. Tom Baker & David Tennant both came to the role pretty fully formed but I think they got even better in subsequent seasons. Even in the one season that we got, I think Eccleston showed marked improvement in the 2nd half of the season. Peter Capaldi's performance was always firing on all cylinders but he spent a lot of his first season fighting against the material he was given.
The big exception, IMO, is Matt Smith. Outside of his first couple recording blocks (basically "The Beast Below" through "Flesh & Stone"), Smith was at his best during his first season. But once he got to his 3rd season, I think he realized that there wasn't anything new to discover about the character, so he got bored. (He did up his game a bit when Tennant & Hurt showed up for "Day of the Doctor.")