• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

MLB World Series 2018: Eh. Dodgers/Boston. Eh.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's probably the most realistic solution, yeah.

Of course, I'm assuming the Coliseum even has a similar structure ie: the outer colonnades to Soldier Field. I have no real idea, but it would allow them to stay put and have a brand new state-of-the-art field. Then they just have to find a place to play for 2 seasons.
 
Of course, I'm assuming the Coliseum even has a similar structure ie: the outer colonnades to Soldier Field. I have no real idea, but it would allow them to stay put and have a brand new state-of-the-art field. Then they just have to find a place to play for 2 seasons.

There’s a nice park across the Bay, though the Giants aren’t the most cooperative of teams.
 
Of course, I'm assuming the Coliseum even has a similar structure ie: the outer colonnades to Soldier Field. I have no real idea, but it would allow them to stay put and have a brand new state-of-the-art field. Then they just have to find a place to play for 2 seasons.

There's really nothing worth preserving at the (Oakland) Coliseum. And there's no need for it anyway - the A's have plenty of room to build a new ballpark on that site while continuing to play in the existing stadium. And like I said it helps that the Warriors and Raiders are no longer hogging any part of the property.
 
Last edited:
I could actually be picturing the LA Coliseum in my head too. But I'm not sure if that one has the proper layout for that type of rebuild either, but they are rebuilding it at least.
 
Yeah, sure, 20/20 hindsight, but I just knew as soon as Tito ordered the intentional walk of Stanton, Gleyber Torres was gonna walk it off. :techman:
 
If the A's wanted to stay at the Coliseum site they could have done that 10 years ago, they want out.
 
If the A's wanted to stay at the Coliseum site they could have done that 10 years ago, they want out.

Not really. They still had the Raiders at that point, and it is likely contracts gave the Raiders the ability to block any changes on the property while they were a tenet.

Now they are no longer an issue.
 
While the stadium never was an architectural wonder to look at, the view of the Oakland Hills from center field was actually quite nice before they basically enclosed it by putting in those hideous extra seats for the Raiders. That ruined it more than anything.
 
Not really. They still had the Raiders at that point, and it is likely contracts gave the Raiders the ability to block any changes on the property while they were a tenet.

Now they are no longer an issue.

Technically they're an issue until 2019 or '20.
 
Technically they're an issue until 2019 or '20.

You're right. Though I figure it would take at least that long to rob Oakland-Alameda County and the City of Oakland, then get plans drawn up. Not sure they could get construction started any sooner if they wanted to.
 
^Libby Schaaf is adamant that the public will not pay for a new stadium, so if they want to stay in Oakland, they’ll have to find another way to finance it.
 
^Libby Schaaf is adamant that the public will not pay for a new stadium, so if they want to stay in Oakland, they’ll have to find another way to finance it.

That's why they offered to buy the Coliseum outright and renovate it themselves.

The most preferable option is to go to San Jose, but, again, that would require the Giants to pull their head out of their ass.

In other news, the Cubs put Darvish on the 10-day DL with "parainfluenza"--which one Cubs beat writer quoted a doctor as saying "it's a fancy term for a cold"--retroactive to May 4, and Maddon effectively admitted it was a wink-wink nudge-nudge move to give him a breather by saying "ask the Dodgers" about roster bullshit.
 
Also, Bryce Harper's OPS is .979.

His BABIP is .188.

Clearly he needs to stop hitting dingers.
 
Because it's Tony Gwynn's birthday, here's a fun fact:

Tony Gwynn struck out 434 times in 10,232 plate appearances.
Aaron Judge has 298 in 931.

To lower his K / PA percentage to Gwynn's career number, Judge would need to not strike out for his next 6,094 trips to the plate.
 
^Why are so many players today averse to just making contact? Gwynn and Boggs did just fine focusing on getting on base rather than hitting home runs.

Meanwhile, the Jackass has returned (and still wants to make an MLB comeback).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top