When the movement against plastic straws began gaining momentum in the past few weeks, I figured the ban on the plastic straw was inevitable. But would they ban them immediately or wait until a biodegradable option was widely in use first? Sounds like many restaurants have already thrown out their straws in favor of Saving the Earth and this does seem like no-brainer.
Then... a few articles started popping up with a counter-argument to the plastic straw ban: the movement excludes those who cannot drink liquid without a plastic straw that bends. Therefore, "Bring your own straw," as an approach to the straw ban = ableism. You are asking the most vulnerable in society to carry all the weight.
Metal straws are a no-go. People who have spasms could injure themselves.
Paper straws? They say they work, but eventually become soggy and useless. I've also read that a paper straw simply won't bend in the way that a plastic one would work. Again, this issue boils down to ableism whereby an able bodied person can roll with the punches straw-free, but someone with a disability can not. The paper straw will work for many, but not for all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-43076495
Shouldn't putting greater burdens on people with disabilities make the ban a hard pass? Sounds like red flag territory to me. Is it a noble cause to save the planet if it means 0.5% of the population are rendered unable to eat and drink outside their home? It says volumes about our culture and society if we go ahead and do this (straw ban) without considering the most vulnerable. Curtly spouting, "well then THEY should bring their own straw!!" does not make one a paragon of justice for the Earth.
Miriam Osborne, a Toronto resident who has arthrogryposis (unable to hold/lift a cup), got a harsh reaction to her request for a straw in the past few places she's visited:
https://www.thestar.com/life/2018/0...g-people-with-disabilities-advocates-say.html
If you are one of those build-a-better-mousetrap person looking-to-make-a-fortune type inventors, now's the time to step up to the plate: we need a biodegradable straw that bends and works just as a plastic one would.... and we needed it yesterday.
Then... a few articles started popping up with a counter-argument to the plastic straw ban: the movement excludes those who cannot drink liquid without a plastic straw that bends. Therefore, "Bring your own straw," as an approach to the straw ban = ableism. You are asking the most vulnerable in society to carry all the weight.
Metal straws are a no-go. People who have spasms could injure themselves.
Paper straws? They say they work, but eventually become soggy and useless. I've also read that a paper straw simply won't bend in the way that a plastic one would work. Again, this issue boils down to ableism whereby an able bodied person can roll with the punches straw-free, but someone with a disability can not. The paper straw will work for many, but not for all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-43076495
"The organisation contacted 10 firms which had pledged to ban plastic straws and said initially none could confirm if their alternatives would suit disabled people.
Four of the companies have since said they will keep plastic straws for use by disabled people until suitable alternatives are sourced."
A small sampling maybe, but those are terrible odds for those with no upper mobility or arm movement.Four of the companies have since said they will keep plastic straws for use by disabled people until suitable alternatives are sourced."
Shouldn't putting greater burdens on people with disabilities make the ban a hard pass? Sounds like red flag territory to me. Is it a noble cause to save the planet if it means 0.5% of the population are rendered unable to eat and drink outside their home? It says volumes about our culture and society if we go ahead and do this (straw ban) without considering the most vulnerable. Curtly spouting, "well then THEY should bring their own straw!!" does not make one a paragon of justice for the Earth.
Miriam Osborne, a Toronto resident who has arthrogryposis (unable to hold/lift a cup), got a harsh reaction to her request for a straw in the past few places she's visited:
https://www.thestar.com/life/2018/0...g-people-with-disabilities-advocates-say.html
Osborne says she’d like to see more discussion about alternatives, saying she was infuriated by three establishments she visited in the past six months that had no straws on hand.
She says they included two bars and one restaurant, and that the staff in each case was unapologetic. Each time, she was forced to leave.
“That attitude of course is what really enraged me, almost more than them not having straws,” she says.
So we can add asking for a straw to the list of things to publicly shame people about. The mystery remains: why is this a binary issue? Why must it be all or nothing?She says they included two bars and one restaurant, and that the staff in each case was unapologetic. Each time, she was forced to leave.
“That attitude of course is what really enraged me, almost more than them not having straws,” she says.
If you are one of those build-a-better-mousetrap person looking-to-make-a-fortune type inventors, now's the time to step up to the plate: we need a biodegradable straw that bends and works just as a plastic one would.... and we needed it yesterday.