Certainly possible. I recently referenced a scene I clearly remembered from STIII here on the BBS (where David says that his mother knew nothing about him adding protomatter to the Genesis matrix), only to find out that it was a scene that only existed in the DC Comics adaptation of the movie. Sometimes your memory can play tricks on you.Having read the novelization more than once (possibly my favorite of the film novelizations), I wonder whether I was remembering that more than the line from the film.
I know that some do, yes. But I find it much more interesting to ponder what the movie itself implies, not the ancillary material.The novels indicate he's known about David since he was conceived.
"Before he could spawn"? What was he, a salmon?Shame that he was killed before he could spawn, effectively killing the Kirk line.
Always seemed rather bizarre to me that Carol kept David away from Kirk because of his job. Should have allowed him to see him during his breaks etc.
But he knew that he used protomatter and that it wasn't safe.Well, him and Saavik investigating Genesis by all rights should have been reasonably safe.
Me neither. Which is why I prefer to believe that Kirk didn't find out about David's existence until after TOS.I don't much like the idea of Kirk being a deadbeat dad, adventuring throughout the galaxy for five years while his son grows up.
How exactly is he a "deadbeat dad"?I don't much like the idea of Kirk being a deadbeat dad, adventuring throughout the galaxy for five years while his son grows up.
In the 23rd century, without child support payments, a child will -How exactly is he a "deadbeat dad"?
Deadbeat as in absent and uncaring, not in the financial sense.How exactly is he a "deadbeat dad"?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.