• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Does anyone find Star Trek II-V very (aesthetically) dated?

Commander Kielbasa

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
Obviously the Original Series is dated in its own ways, as is the first movie, but....

Between the color grading of the 'Trilogy' and V, Khan and his crew looking like an 80s Hair Metal band in II, Uhura's Jheri Curl, Kirk's TJ Hooker perm and other things, does anyone feel that II-V are very visually dated?
Wrath_of_Kahn-MAIN.jpg

william-shatner-refused-to-play-kirk-in-star-trek-iv-unless-he-was-allowed-to-direct-star-trek-v.jpg

twok_comm_kirk.jpg

latest

Star_Trek_III_021.jpg

While the OS is dated in terms of SPX I find things like haircuts and stuff like that featured on the show to have generally stood the test of time. A guy could go out and wear Kirk's hairdo now and not look old fashioned, but if he wore Kirk's TJ Hooker rug he'd look ridiculous today. Even Khan looked better in the OS:
James-Tiberius-Kirk-Star-Trek-William-Shatner.jpg

hqdefault.jpg
 
Perhaps they are visually dated but I don't really give a rat's ass. Won't affect my desire to watch them.
I'm not put off by a 40s gangster movie simply because it looks like the 1940s. I can watch a movie like Earthquake and at times cringe because it just reeks 70s but that's part of its charm.
 
This will always happen, the new Trek stuff will look comically bad in a few years, just the way it goes, guessing what will still look good in the future never work.
 
Between the color grading of the 'Trilogy' and V, Khan and his crew looking like an 80s Hair Metal band in II, Uhura's Jheri Curl, Kirk's TJ Hooker perm and other things, does anyone feel that II-V are very visually dated?
Absolutely. It's horrible. People should have common sense when making SciFi movies/shows, - not to interject the present day styles.

By the way, Khan should have been into the styles of the 1990s, not the 1980s.
 
Last edited:
Hey, what about Kirk needing glasses in IV. What's up with that? They don't have an improved version of LASIK eye surgery by then? And worse yet, he ends up with antique ones from our past?
 
Hey, what about Kirk needing glasses in IV. What's up with that? They don't have an improved version of LASIK eye surgery by then? And worse yet, he ends up with antique ones from our past?

Kirk appreciates relics from the past, even if he feels like one himself sometimes.

Absolutely. It's horrible. People should have common sense when making SciFi movies/shows, - not to interject the present day styles.

On the other hand, we've seen what happens when they try to imagine styles of the future in TNG...
 
I get that, and feel the same way myself. But, why would he not correct his vision with the technology available?

Maybe it reminds him of his human frailty. Keeps him humble. People do weird things for reasons that make sense only to them. McCoy allows it because he understands human psychology, plus it's not a potentially fatal condition. Just a quality of life thing. Maybe Kirk thinks he looks good in specs. Since he was not actively jaunting around and fighting wars, in which case this single point of failure could make all the difference between life and death for his crew, he's cool with it.

Hey, it's not like he anticipates this, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Enough_at_Last
 
It looks visually dated but the '80s are the decade of my childhood (and the '90s are the decade of my adolescence), so I don't care.

Heavy Metal Khan is the best Khan. Same with the Klingons.

By the way, Khan should have been into the styles of the 1990s, not the 1980s.

Khan hated Grunge, so he resisted it to his last breath.
 
Last edited:
I was reading a discussion about Blake's 7 the other day where someone was talking about how the show's approach to technology and design had now aged into almost having a steam punk style aesthetic to it. Which is an idea I kind of liked and made me think we need a similar term for those 60's-80's (not sure when the cut off point would be, probably around the time shows like TNG started introducing more modern style computers than the old solid state ones?) takes on SF that have that sort of aesthetic and look to them. I can actually see there being a mini-genre one day of SF with BBC micro style computers you have to climb into with a welder to fix and everyone has mullets.
 
Between the color grading of the 'Trilogy' and V, Khan and his crew looking like an 80s Hair Metal band in II, Uhura's Jheri Curl, Kirk's TJ Hooker perm and other things, does anyone feel that II-V are very visually dated?
Yeah, a bit. When I last watched TSFS (shortly after Leonard Nimoy's death, I think), I noticed that it's probably the most 80s looking of the films, with all those pastel colors, the hairstyles, and the popped collars on the costumes. And yeah, Shatner's TJ Hooker hair has not stood the test of time well.

I personally find it fascinating how depictions of the future become dated. We think of the Flash Gordon comic strip as being a very 1930s view of the future today, and some bits of TOS practically scream 1960s (all that tie-dye costuming in the third season...), and TMP seems very 1970s, with the leisure suit/footie pajamas uniforms. Nicholas Meyer once said that if you filmed a historical drama taking place in say, 1575, in four different decades (the 1930s, the 1950s, the 1970s, etc.), you would be able to tell which year each version was filmed just by the costumes and filming styles.

But honestly, the Star Trek that looks the most dated to me today is TNG. It looks super 1980s, even as the show stretched into the early 1990s. TOS's style was generally more classic and timeless, but TNG looks very much of its time to me.
 
Yeah, a bit. When I last watched TSFS (shortly after Leonard Nimoy's death, I think), I noticed that it's probably the most 80s looking of the films, with all those pastel colors, the hairstyles, and the popped collars on the costumes. And yeah, Shatner's TJ Hooker hair has not stood the test of time well.
I agree with you 100%. The thing that makes it look especially dated to me is the very flat lighting used in a lot of the bridge and Earth sequences in the first part of the film. It's very reminiscent of the boring cinematography from a lot of TV series around the same time. It's only after they arrive at Genesis does the cinematography start doing more interesting things with setups and use of shadow.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top