noThere should be an explanation that makes these Discovery Klingons fit into the timeline that has totally different ones a mere ten years later.
noThere should be an explanation that makes these Discovery Klingons fit into the timeline that has totally different ones a mere ten years later.
Nah, only if you're the type to worry about such things.Then it looks glaringly like a stuff up.
Throw away line and make it go away.If they show other types of Klingons, they can say "There are several types of Klingons. See how little you know about our race?" It's essentially the equivalent of "We do not discuss it with Outsiders," that acknowledges it without devoting an entire story -- let alone a two-parter -- to it.
If they don't show other types of Klingons, then I think it's a non-issue in the context of Discovery.
If something needs a tweet to try and explain how it fits, it's a fail.
This. I'm really tired of the constant assumptions that are made that everything must be explained on screen or it automatically "doesn't fit" and "isn't Prime."
Lorca is from the MU. Sufficent for me.IMHO, only stuff that's contradictory to the previous shows should have an onscreen explanation (like Lorca's Horta). New stuff that's just new (like Kelpians, for example) needs no explanation.
If they explain everything on screen would that solve the issue?
There in lies the problem. "Reasonable" is highly subjective.I'm not demanding an explanation of everything. I don't have a maximalist position. But an explanation of major differences would solve the issue, if the explanation was reasonable.
Lorca is from the MU. Sufficent for me.
He knew of Janus IV and simply took an egg because he is from the MU.Not Lorca himself, the Horta he possessed.
To a degree, yes. But that's a different question than whether an explanation is needed/advisable in the first place.There in lies the problem. "Reasonable" is highly subjective.
The larger question to me is whether the explanation would help anything at all?To a degree, yes. But that's a different question than whether an explanation is needed/advisable in the first place.
The larger question to me is whether the explanation would help anything at all?
Well they changed everything about themselves in a mere three to four years between TOS and TMP, so a decade is ages.There should be an explanation that makes these Discovery Klingons fit into the timeline that has totally different ones a mere ten years later.
Well they changed everything about themselves in a mere three to four years between TOS and TMP, so a decade is ages.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.