He only really killed what like 2 or 3 computers in the whole series. So where does this reputation of Kirk being a computer killer come from?
All that Kirk needs to say to crash a three-hundred-thousand-year-old working computer is:" I am lying."
He only really killed what like 2 or 3 computers in the whole series. So where does this reputation of Kirk being a computer killer come from?
Lately I’ve been reading a lot of Piper and Leinster, as well as Doc Smith. I never noticed the near-constant backdrop of a future ruled by corporations and bureaucrats the way I do now. Depending on the author—Pohl and del Ray come to mind, too—the inhuman nature of business-as-salvation is either a good or bad thing. TOS and its humanistic vision can be seen as part of that tradition.Kirk's propensity for destroying computers was part of an overarching humanistic theme of TOS. We are better than our machines. Our emotions, our flaws, the whole package, is something special. So you can throw in By Any Other Name and Who Mourns, too, where the very qualities of being human are why Kirk prevails.
"There are some things men must do to remain men."
It's no coincidence that Spock's struggle to control his emotions was set up in contrast to Kirk's embracing his.
Indeed, the entire TOS crew (including Spock, when called for) utilized their humanity, including their emotions, their will to live, and their sexuality, on their missions. It's what set them apart from the later shows (and, sadly, from modern life).
I don't know if modern sci fi has lost this theme, but modern life certainly has.
Of course not. Wrath of Kahn is.I mean, seriously, TMP is the best Trek movie?![]()
Lately I’ve been reading a lot of Piper and Leinster, as well as Doc Smith. I never noticed the near-constant backdrop of a future ruled by corporations and bureaucrats the way I do now. Depending on the author—Pohl and del Ray come to mind, too—the inhuman nature of business-as-salvation is either a good or bad thing. TOS and it’s humanistic vision can be seen as part of that tradition.
If I ever saw Capt. Kirk at a help desk of a computer store, I would run.
WorthlessFYI, the only computer thing I could destroy was an application on a computer. I opened a resource editor upon itself. It kinda freaked out and went catatonic.
Microsoft probably has Kirk on a Wanted poster...
Kirk was like human malware. He talked computers to death or defeat all the time.
...
The man was a menace.![]()
Kirk was able to defeat a robot (basically a walking computer) by calling Spock a name, that also happened to be a speciest slur.
Add Mike Nesmith to the list:If you people remember "The Avengers" was an Old British spy series that was contemporaneous with TOS. John Steed in that series that was somewhat Sci.fiish, once defeated a sophisticated computer by ordering it to destroy itself. In "The Prisoner"
Patrick McGoohan destroys a computer by asking it "Why?". Apparently back then they thought that computers were supposed to answer all the questions that were put to them or cease to function.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.