• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll Do you consider Discovery to truly be in the Prime Timeline at this point?

Is it?

  • Yes, that's the official word and it still fits

    Votes: 194 44.7%
  • Yes, but it's borderline at this point

    Votes: 44 10.1%
  • No, there's just too many inconsistencies

    Votes: 147 33.9%
  • I don't care about continuity, just the show's quality

    Votes: 49 11.3%

  • Total voters
    434
The explanation "they changed the makeup" is nothing but a handwave; it explains nothing at all. A morphogenic virus allows reasonable inferences that explain any and all "ridge" variations in later Klingons in in-story terms.
No, its the actual reason. All the in-universe stuff are the handwaves taken to a ridiculous extreme.
It's much simpler to think the Klingons always had those ridges and that how they look in TOS was exclusive to that show. For all I cared, Kang, Koloth, and Kor always had forehead ridges even during TOS. The DS9 gag was exactly what it was at the time: a gag. It was never meant to be taken seriously, as the whole show is a fun lark. In a lot of ways I was relieved when a Klingon appeared on Enterprise looking like how they have in the last 20 years of Trek. The show later introducing that augment virus was simply unnecessary and only made things more convoluted.
Exactly
IMTYFxG.jpg

kIvF8gE.jpg
0esNGQx.jpg

WOwbpbY.png
p2M84q6.png

Ds50D4d.png
 
The explanation "they changed the makeup" is nothing but a handwave; it explains nothing at all. A morphogenic virus allows reasonable inferences that explain any and all "ridge" variations in later Klingons in in-story terms.
So, what's wrong with DISCO Klingons by that argument?
No, its the actual reason. All the in-universe stuff are the handwaves taken to a ridiculous extreme.

Exactly
IMTYFxG.jpg

kIvF8gE.jpg
0esNGQx.jpg

WOwbpbY.png
p2M84q6.png

Ds50D4d.png
v5OrOQa.gif
 
I don't know what Star Trek shows you've been watching, but the ones I'm familiar with have very seldom been about "villains," especially not clichéd tropey ones. Trek stories usually involve much more interesting kinds of challenges.
Wrath of Khan, Search for Spock, Final Frontier, Undiscovered Country, Generations, Insurrection, Nemesis...

Hell, they totally butchered the entire premise of the Borg just so they could have Picard and Data opposite a traditional zombie-thot villain character.

In the TV series, we have:
Q (like 8 times), Armus, Damon Bok (twice), Sela (also twice), Duras (twice), Duras' sisters (twice), Lore (3 times), Kivas Fajo, Ardra, Ben Maxwell, Gul Macet, Gul Dukat (a dozen times), Gowron (briefly), Various versions of Weyoun, Kai Wyn, the Female Changeling, Seska, Maj Culluh, The Borg Queen on Voyager (cringe), the Vidiians, the Malons, Futureguy/Silik, Degara and the Xindi Reptillians, The Space Nazis from Outer Space, Arik Soong, Arik Soong's augments, Duras('s great grandfather or something), the guys from Chosen Realm, Robocop, Shran (occasionally), V'Las and his Vulcan dictatorship, the Romulans and their droneship, literally everyone in the Mirror Universe...

I mean, yes, it's a show about exploration and scientific intrigue, negative space wedgies, Eldritch Abominations from the Twilight Zone, and the occasional romantic comedy. But you aren't seriously trying to claim that Mustache Twirling Villains haven't been a staple in Star Trek pretty much FOREVER?

Remember "The Drumhead?" Picard tells Worf "Villains who twirl their mustaches are easy to spot. The ones that cloak themselves in good intentions are well hidden." So consider the above list to be just the OBVIOUS villains; don't even get me started on Alyana "I'm going to send your old ass on a covert mission you are in no way trained for and probably won't survive because you really pissed me off last year over the whole Borg thing" Nechayev.
 
I think longer hair definitely looks better on ridged Klingons.

On another note, related to this: My apologies to Nerys Myk. I have a bad habit of accidentally putting my foot in my mouth sometimes.
 
I was referring to the Klingon ships in The Motion Picture; the claim was that they were basically the same as the Klingon ships in the original series.

That's true. The K't'inga-class was just an uprated D7 with more surface detailing to accommodate filming for the big screen and was later retconned to be a separate class of battle cruiser. I love both.
 
One retcons a few episodes over the course of three years from when the medium was in its relative infancy. The other retcons an iconic look used in hundreds of episodes and a dozen movies over the course of nearly 40 years.

At some point, if you want a new creature, create new creature.
There's been so much variation in Klingons over the last 30+ year I don't think "iconic" applies. And when it comes right down to it the DISCO version is just another take on what was introduced ion 1979.
 
Kras from "Friday's Child(TOS)" actually looks kinda cool with ridges. Tige Andrews had the attitude but he just didn't have the look or the makeup. Bob the Discount Klingon deserved better. ;)
 
Spoken to a few people, I actually think it should officially be called the Co-Prime timeline. It explains it pretty well and shuts up some of the "haterz".
 
Spoken to a few people, I actually think it should officially be called the Co-Prime timeline. It explains it pretty well and shuts up some of the "haterz".
Have you met the Internet? ;)

Kras from "Friday's Child(TOS)" actually looks kinda cool with ridges. Tige Andrews had the attitude but he just didn't have the look or the makeup. Bob the Discount Klingon deserved better. ;)
I think Kor and Mara also look good with the ridges. Though, Kor had that very business-looking face. Still looks good.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top