Pus he said he likes to take the time to make the episodes so they are up to a level he considers to be good, which is harder to do if they crank out twenty or so episodes a year.
Pus he said he likes to take the time to make the episodes so they are up to a level he considers to be good, which is harder to do if they crank out twenty or so episodes a year.
In the case of Orville, the post-production work takes forever to do. The S1 finale for example only finished its post production work something like two weeks prior to airing despite being filmed some point in late spring/early summer, I think.Are filming times actually more days if the season is shorter? That must just mean they start earlier if true, because Orville stil aired with the standard schedule until it ended, really.
It was very Generic Voyager Episode, apart from Dr Finn stabbing her captor to death.
Although, shows with shorter seasons taking longer to film isn't unheard of, as shows with twenty-plus episodes usually end up spending a ridiculous amount of overtime to stay on track. I know on DS9, it was confirmed each episode took six days to film with production going from 7 AM to 11PM each day. They'd take a day off, and begin the next episode. For twenty-six consecutive weeks.
Yeah, 22 episodes is more doable for something like The Orville since it's episodes are pretty much standalone. Like I said, I was mainly talking about arc heavy shows that trying to do one single continual story through the entire 20+ episode season.While I don't mind shorter seasons for the most part I think their is argument that longer seasons actually can lead to more character development. You have more time to focus on just character stuff that some might write off as just filler. The shorter the season the less time you also have towards creating a new world which is a big thing for genre shows were you don't always have a modern setting. "Orville" could have easily worked with 22 episodes and if we had those extra shows we might know even more about the characters and even more about that universe.
Jason
I'd say more if I remembered more about it."It was just like something I saw once. Except that it wasn't."
It's encouraging that you have to perform contortions in order to find ways to criticize the show.![]()
Read: "FOX doesn't want to fully commit to a standard full season..."MacFarlane has said he'll continue doing seasons in the neighbourhood of a dozen episodes or so to avoid wasteful fillers, so there we are.
Read: "FOX doesn't want to fully commit to a standard full season..."
Better than bottle or clip shows.Read: "FOX doesn't want to fully commit to a standard full season..."
Better than bottle or clip shows.
True, but I am preferring the current format. Bottle shows can be good, but can be so limited by budget hamstringing that it can be a missed opportunity as well.Some of the best episodes of television can come from bottle shows.
You're right, though, on clip shows. Nothing good can come of those.
I haven't seen this mentioned, and maybe it's already the stuff of legend, but isn't that a giant space testicle with epididymis and vas deferens in The Orville opening credits at 0:39?
Maybe it's just me, but it seems obvious, and just like Seth to include it.
Are you talking about the planet being sucked into the blackhole?
No one does 26 episodes these days. Hell, by the mid 90s I think it was only the Star Trek shows that still did 26, by then 22-24 were becoming the norm on American network TV. Even today, a full season on one of the networks is around 20 or so. No one is definitely doing 26 anymore.I can't remember the last time a MacFarlane show got a 26 episode order.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.