Evil Wuxia Space Tyrant with the Fidget Spinner from Hell
Or
Predatory Woody Allen Rapist in Spaaaaaaace
I’ll take Wuxia Space Tyrants for 500 Alex...
So you’re saying Woody Allen is worse then space Mussolini
Evil Wuxia Space Tyrant with the Fidget Spinner from Hell
Or
Predatory Woody Allen Rapist in Spaaaaaaace
I’ll take Wuxia Space Tyrants for 500 Alex...
Still no Trek optimism and still lots of doom and gloom.
I don't doubt that you will keep watching.I and many many many fans would absolutely pay to watch Sonequa Martin-Green as Michael Burnham. First Black Female lead on Star Trek and a character unlike any other we have ever seen on Trek. She’s compelling, sympathetic, conflicted, struggling, flawed and yet still aims towards the highest ideals the Federation represents.
It’s her story and I’m there for it to the end.
For some odd reason, I do not trust the word of a mass murdering psychopath who eats Kelpians.It has nothing to do with MU Lorca being “deceptive” and everything to do with him being a sexual predator. And that’s been made very clear, so you insisting otherwise is just incorrect.
Lorca is probably a mass murderer as well.For some odd reason, I do not trust the word of a mass murdering psychopath who eats Kelpians.
With Lorca gone Saru is acting captain.I would rather have a show with an alien captain tellarite, andorian or vulcan
Lorca is probably a mass murderer as well.
So I guess that theory of Lorca being section 31 is also out the window.
Whether "our" Stamets ended up aboard ISS Charon in the right uniform, or aboard USS Discovery in the wrong one, is currently utterly unknown.
Timo Saloniemi
And Klingons fighting with Bat'Leth makes sense.Michelle Yeoh is awful and her scenes are painfully corny. In fact, much of this episode was once again unintentionally cornball. We've got the cast wearing ridiculous costumes, Georgiou is walking around with a sword and a magic boomerang that can slice through people's heads, and the show is taking itself completely seriously.
Too much magic in this episode also. (The same can be said for this show as a whole)
That’s not an excuse. The show trades on the Trek name. It can’t just dump the majority of what Trek is and still hold the mantel.Season 2
Anyways, this Star trek is too à la LOST for me.
I'm thinking about MU Lorca:
First he said he can't stand bright light because of the buran accident. When he is tortured by L'rell, she said his eyes are damaged. We saw he cured his eyes to see the klingon ship destruction.
And now they say his eyes were never damaged, they are just made so?
Lorca is probably a mass murderer as well.
Lorca would not be popular if Burnham was well written and well acted. Sadly the character fails on both fronts. I have not and do not care about Burnham’s arc. In fact so far I have found just about all the non-Klingon cast to be more interesting than Burnham. Frankly I am much more interested to see what happens to Stamets or Saru than following Burnham’s highly predictable rise to Captain.I don't doubt that you will keep watching.
But since Lorca has consistently polled as the most popular character, getting rid of him will not be good for ratings. You can't tick off a large section of the show's fanbase and keep your ratings good.
Not everyone watches to check off their "has my preferred identity group been represented" list. Some of us like intellectual and personality diversity within good stories.
I don't understand what is confusing about this. He said his eye condition was because of the Buran accident but the real reason is because he is from the mirror universe where the light is different.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.