Try centuries. Don Quixote is one of the earliest examples, while Huckleberry Finn is only the most famous. And then there's alot of the fiction based on/inspired by Guy Fawkes, which is both meant as a bit of antihero worship and gallows humor for what an asshole fawkes actually was.The anti-hero has been with us for decades.
Because Star Trek fans do that?Let's be honest. The Shenzhou was left floating out their like some big staged prop. Nothing more complicated than that, why try and make it logical in terms of the story.
You're equating 'plenty of' in terms of technology and not simple resources that the enemy could use and further their cause.
It's not like scuttling a ship or setting it on self-destruct is not straight forward.
Let's be honest. The Shenzhou was left floating out their like some big staged prop. Nothing more complicated than that, why try and make it logical in terms of the story.
As others have pointed out, scuttling a starship is an option for Captains to prevent the capture of their vessel and/or crew by the enemy. There are no standing orders requiring it, though, which is why we have only ever seen self destruct mechanisms being activated as a kind of desperation tactic when the bad guys are about to capture the ship and use it against them.That's kind of nonsense though. You're equating 'plenty of' in terms of technology and not simple resources that the enemy could use and further their cause. Give the enemy nothing. No chance to loot a dilithium processor, no access to Starfleet anything. It's not like scuttling a ship or setting it on self-destruct is not straight forward. Or standard procedure if the Glenn is anything to go by.
That's where I left it.Oh, yeah! Because stuff being left behind in battlefields is not something realistic.Look at all these staged props!
I doubt someone went there to recover the telescope. The telescope was probably recovered during the evacuation itself. Except for the Kelvin Timeline ones, Starfleet Escape Pods generally do have some space to spare.
Crewmen Personal Effects are more important to Starfleet than giving a few worthless scraps for the Klingon Empire, it's simple as that. They put the well being of people above pettiness, it's not hard to imagine that's a thing in Star Trek.
People do weird things in crises.It might be intended, but the idea that someone grabbed the telescope during the emergency evacuation into a lifeboat is ludicrous.
It actually had its own escape pod.Lucky break really that Georgiou's last will and testament that bequeathed this telescope to Michael justified someone's telepathic efforts to retrieve it.
As others have pointed out, scuttling a starship is an option for Captains to prevent the capture of their vessel and/or crew by the enemy. There are no standing orders requiring it, though, which is why we have only ever seen self destruct mechanisms being activated as a kind of desperation tactic when the bad guys are about to capture the ship and use it against them.
Shenzhou, by comparison, is a floating hulk with no power, systems disabled, and unable to be restored in a reasonable amount of time. So much like the Constellation, the Exeter, the Stargazer, the Hathaway, the Jenolan, the Pegasus, the Lantree and even the Enterprise-D, the recovery of a wrecked starship is probably something best left to OTHER STARSHIPS which might eventually tow it to a scrapyard or a dry dock to be re-purposed.
IOW, if it wasn't for the fact that the entire fleet was suddenly locked in a truly epic war with the Klingon Empire, standard procedure would be to take the Shenzhou in a tractor beam and tow it to the nearest starbase. Now that the war is basically over, that will probably end up happening anyway.
If it was not recovered, then the point that Starfleet values personal effects is meaningless. If they consider such more important, then the telescope was probably recovered.
I don't see how crew members will bother to carry bulky objects containing personal effects (especially belonging to others) as they rush for escape pods.
More likely they will consider anything portable that they think will be detrimental to Starfleet if recovered by the enemy first.
As for recovery efforts, I think it is more logical for Starfleet to recover what can be used for the war effort and that might be advantageous for the enemy before anything else.
Finally, I think the scene is a poor example of writing not only because of the plot hole but because it appears to be a rushed attempt at creating sentimentality.
It might be intended, but the idea that someone grabbed the telescope during the emergency evacuation into a lifeboat is ludicrous.
You can't just call small worthless details "plot holes", just because you're feeling pedantic about a TV Series. Plot holes are stuff that stop the flow of the story completely. I really doubt a 15-minutes sequence of Saru carrying that Telescope around would've told us anything new. There's stuff that is just common sense and there's no need to overly-explain it to your audience. They evacuated, they brought personal stuff along and that's the end of it. It's not complicated, it is only if you want it to be.
To be honest, everything was staged. In fact every single Klingon and Starfleet officer was actually an actor. I think most of us are aware. By the same token, why try and look for problems? The story is actually pretty simple - the scene is left more or less as we last saw it. I'd say you're complicating it by arguing it's standard procedure to clean up battlegrounds and there must be a reason it didn't happen.Let's be honest. The Shenzhou was left floating out there like some big staged prop. Nothing more complicated than that, why try and make it logical in terms of the story.
So a single personal item surviving breaks your suspension of disbelief, but had they come home with the freaking Klingon cloaking device itself without any explanation as to how they got it, it would have solved it? Oookaaay...They took the time to take a telescope with them but never considered to get the cloaking device from the Klingon ship.
In fact every single Klingon and Starfleet officer was actually an actor.
Why? To use it themselves? Because the Klingons weren't using it at that point either and I expect Starfleet didn't think of the device as a serious threat until all of them started using it. They probably assumed that T'Kuvma was a one-trick pony and that the secrets of the technology died with him. If Kol hadn't both salvaged the ship and found a way to reverse engineer the technology, they would have been right.The Shenzhou isn't the the biggest issue with this plot element. Starfleet could have easily gotten their hands on the Klingon cloaking device.
You see that doesn't make sense in story either. When Michael gave Saru the telescope he expressed (as much as Saru can) touching recognition it was Georgiou's. So this inseucre Officer takes the telescope in the first place, is magically contacted by God know's who, that it is a bequeathed item in a will. Lol. He then sends it off to them. It is then packed up with the recording, quickly finds new science specialist Michael (good thing she wasn't in prison it would have to be resent!). THEN when Michael gives Saru the telescope he gets to rest his sensitive gaze on something he had apparently not that long ago chucked into an escape pod."I served with Georgiou god knows how many years, I'm very sad because of her passing, I can run like hell and I have superior physical strenght... But you know what ? Fuck all those personal belongings of my dear Captain. I'm outta here" - Saru, probably![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.