Are we ignoring that another human jammed a starship up the space whale's ass, which our heroic Discovery crew never removed? Okay, I guess we are.even saving the endangered space-whale all point to humanity's general non-grievousness.
Nope. That's why I said "general non-grievousness".Are we ignoring that another human jammed a starship up the space whale's ass, which our heroic Discovery crew never removed? Okay, I guess we are.
Better than a colonoscopy.They gave it some ex-lax and a long magazine, some things take care of themselves. It isn’t going to be happy though.
It was an act of compassion on Burnham, Tilly, and Stamet's parts from as soon as they learned the creature was sentient/sapient and suffering, and (eventually) on Saru's part as well. Stamets risked his life for it, Tilly her career, and Burnham risked her life (by testing its sapience in not attacking her) and her only chance at some semblance of redemption with Starfleet to do the right thing.I submit that the creature was only released when it shut down and could no longer perform. It was then discarded with a packed lunch of rainbow spores and bloody big headache. This was not an act of compassion but a practical shift of direction. The victim was stripped of its very essence, its DNA... harvested without its permission.
When they discovered that Mudd's ship was inside the Gormagander's stomach they had a very limited timetable to prevent Mudd from blowing up the ship again or turning it over to the Klingons, space-whale included (the Klingons would probably kill it), so the priority would not have been removing a ship which while uncomfortable, was clearly not immediately life threatening to the creature.Are we ignoring that another human jammed a starship up the space whale's ass, which our heroic Discovery crew never removed? Okay, I guess we are.
Lorca would flip him off and go back to trying to kill Klingons.
Q: Picard never flipped me off!Lorca would flip him off and go back to trying to kill Klingons.
Burnham coached them all into doing it. But she is not a prime example of what humanity has become since she was raised on vulcan. Stamets committed an illegal act to spare the creature which proves what? That they will compromise their ethics to save them from compromising their ethics?It was an act of compassion on Burnham, Tilly, and Stamet's parts from as soon as they learned the creature was sentient/sapient and suffering, and (eventually) on Saru's part as well. Stamets risked his life for it, Tilly her career, and Burnham risked her life (by testing its sapience in not attacking her) and her only chance at some semblance of redemption with Starfleet to do the right thing.
They said in the episode that needed to the help the creature or else Lorca would be court-martialed but Lorca did not seem concerned with the creatures well being. Saru and Burnham were the ones that pushed to help the creature. Burnham who was raised by Vulcans and Saru the non-human.When they discovered that Mudd's ship was inside the Gormagander's stomach they had a very limited timetable to prevent Mudd from blowing up the ship again or turning it over to the Klingons, space-whale included (the Klingons would probably kill it), so the priority would not have been removing a ship which while uncomfortable, was clearly not immediately life threatening to the creature.
Given that they went out of their way during time of war (even the normally warhawk-ey Lorca) to rescue an endangered species and transport it to somewhere it could be treated and breed in safety, why would there be any doubt that they would remove Mudd's ship from the creature's stomach as soon as the immediate threat to Discovery was neutralized?
Also, are the crew qualified or equipped to perform the necessary surgery or transporter operation to safely remove the ship from the space-whale? What if they end up damaging it more in the process due to unfamiliarity with its physiology? Perhaps the better option is to leave the ship be until qualified veterinarians... IN SPAAAAAAACE!!! can handle the problem without harming the creature further.
Lorca grabs a phaser rifle and shoots Q in the chest. Q, shocked, looks at the gaping hole in his chest, then back at Lorca.
Q: "You shot me! Picard never shot me! Janeway never shot me! Sisko punched me, and Robau kicked my ass, but they never sunk so low as to shoot me! Just what kind of Starfleet captain are you?"
Lorca: "I'm Gabriel Lorca, bitch. Welcome to USS Discovery. Now get off my bridge."
Q vanishes.
I think the TNG relaunch novels retconned it so that Q was just testing Picard specifically and that it was never his intention to actually punish them or anything.Q judging humanity was always a stupid and ill thought out idea.
Stalking taken to the cosmic level.I think the TNG relaunch novels retconned it so that Q was just testing Picard specifically and that it was never his intention to actually punish them or anything.
Which is probably why it pretty much sucks.The whole Q storyline was something of an afterthought when they had to beef Encounter at Farpoint up to a two hour telemovie.
Low bar.And yet, still arguably the more interesting storyline in Farpoint. Interpret that how you will.
I was not addressing the broader premise of your thread but rather responding to the specific issues raised in the two posts I quoted, so you're arguing a different point than the ones I was replying to.Burnham coached them all into doing it. But she is not a prime example of what humanity has become since she was raised on vulcan. Stamets committed an illegal act to spare the creature which proves what? That they will compromise their ethics to save them from compromising their ethics?
They said in the episode that needed to the help the creature or else Lorca would be court-martialed but Lorca did not seem concerned with the creatures well being. Saru and Burnham were the ones that pushed to help the creature. Burnham who was raised by Vulcans and Saru the non-human.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.