Everything in Trek gets a pass if it's associated with a film or series that that person likes.
I said I liked the episode. Still doesn't make the actions of the Discovery crew make any kind of sense.
Everything in Trek gets a pass if it's associated with a film or series that that person likes.
Lastly...it is rare. Mudd might know were to get them, but they might be off some rare animal, or even off the Bajoran orbs. These are things that Starfleet might not be able to justify gathering up, or the numbers they could get won't be enough to outfit every ship for all time. Their might be only 300 of these things possible within a year's time (or even in a hundred years' time). It take time to gather, and by then, whatever it is you needed doing is over.
They did vanish. But obviously Mudd knows where to get them, since he used them before. They are a mega weapon that should've interested Discovery's crew far more than they did.
Mudd's a thief, a swindler, a con artist. He sells people out for short and long term gain, depending upon the situation. He's likely in deep with any number of organizations with deep pockets, and likely just as hunted by others. He's a man without scruple, and with a clear desire to get as much as he can any way he can. People like Mudd manage to wriggle out of responsibility while cashing in at the same time. There are a myriad number of ways he could have obtained these, even as rare as they are.Can't be that rare if Mudd was able to acquire the things on multiple occasions.
They're not intended to have further repercussions. Just like the Guardian of Forever only set up that episode and wasn't used again even though it should've been by your logic.
There are a myriad number of ways he could have obtained these, even as rare as they are.
Very true. It is a Sisyphean effort, because even if I were to somehow "win," it would only be taken up by someone else. Honestly, I don't get too far anymore anyway, as I just enjoy the show as it is. Star Trek is a wonderful show for me, but that's what it is, a show, some movies, a game: entertainment. I like it to be as consistent as possible, but there are no kittens if canon is violated in order to better serve the story.
Again, Temporal Cold War. DS9's war arc, all had technology that could have been devastating to the enemy, but was forgotten in order to better serve the plot. Otherwise, the very first and last episode of Star Trek would have been "Where No Man Has Gone Before."
Only the bracelet vanished at the end. The actual time crystal was inside Mudd's ship in the Gormagander. We never saw it in the first place, and, personally I do expect it to appear again later in the season. Whatever anyone thinks of the quality of DSC so far, one thing is irrefutable, imo: these writers do have a plan that they are clearly unfolding over the course of the season. One thing leads to another, controversial ideas are revisited, etc. No way they threw something this powerful into the mix for a one-off side story.
The problem is that it gets old. You have 75% of a message board talking up a lively discussion about the ins-and-outs of a series that they like (. You have 20% trying to break through and, for some reason, feel they need to be heard over the din of all us “rainbow and pony” people who like the series for what it is…and that comes off as combative and irritating for some)…but that’s the only way their opinions will feel validated and rationalized.
Um, no. The spore drive isn't "rare and exorbitant," it's experimental. There are two ships. One went wonky, and the other one enjoys a wide latitude from the Admiralty. These crystals are apparently very hard to find, and once they're gone, they're gone, as we saw when Mudd used his.To say "let's use these extremely rare and unique crystals to blow up a few ships instead of using a handful of ships we can repair or rebuild to accomplish the same task" is to waste resources that could be best used elsewhere.
Only the bracelet vanished at the end. The actual time crystal was inside Mudd's ship in the Gormagander. We never saw it in the first place, and, personally I do expect it to appear again later in the season. Whatever anyone thinks of the quality of DSC so far, one thing is irrefutable, imo: these writers do have a plan that they are clearly unfolding over the course of the season. One thing leads to another, controversial ideas are revisited, etc. No way they threw something this powerful into the mix for a one-off side story.
Again, a Star Trek tradition is to introduce a world changing technology, and forget it by the next episode. The horse has long since left the barn and got a job.
Wow, one more entire time for something so incredibly powerful! Woot! Yeah, that makes sense. Again it was just a plot device that allowed that story.It was used again, in the TAS episode "Yesteryear".
Exactly so! Complaining about it now is kind of funny. And, at least this episode found a way to address that issue. They're exceedingly rare and its gone.Again, a Star Trek tradition is to introduce a world changing technology, and forget it by the next episode. The horse has long since left the barn and got a job.
I quit seeing it as serious sci-fi a really long time ago.
Some times you (the general you) just have to let go of the nitpickyness and enjoy the story. It's science fiction and not everything is going to work out perfectly. The intent was clear. They wanted to tell a time loop story and the crystals were the means for doing that.
So why get bent out of shape over some silly time crystals that just facilitated a fun story?! Relax and enjoy the ride. I notice you're not nitpicking the shit out of The Orville, which is entirely fine. Yet, these time crystals, holy cow the nerve of those writers!
They told a time loop story. They didn’t tell a story without huge plot and logic holes. Like every other story there are people who liked the story and/or didn’t mind the lack of logic and there are those who didn’t like the story and/or were bothered by the plot holes. I don’t understand why one group or the other should shut up and not voice their opinion.
I actually liked the story, I just thought the end made zero sense. Much like "Cadet-to-Captain" in the Abrams films. One can enjoy something and still admit there are flaws.
You're making an logic error. Just because Mudd had two doesn't mean they're common. I have two exceedingly rare coins. Just because I have two doesn't make them common. There's a reason why I have two.Can't be that rare if Mudd was able to acquire the things on multiple occasions.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.