Sez you."Early stages" does not mean having a fully functional holodeck which hides the entire room, creates the illusion of depth and perspective.
Sez you."Early stages" does not mean having a fully functional holodeck which hides the entire room, creates the illusion of depth and perspective.
"Early stages" does not mean having a fully functional holodeck which hides the entire room, creates the illusion of depth and prospective. Geordie was talking in the context of technology advances in the last 80 years when he said "wait until you see the holodeck".
Memory alpha acknowledges that there has been no official word from CBS on whether the animated series is canon or not
![]()
TNG never once said that the holographic environment simulator was brand new.
Quite. I suspect this is exactly what some are getting hung up on, without remembering the specific details of what is said...Yes, because it's impressive. As Riker himself said in the pilot.
The computer said "hologram battle simulation complete" sure. But they were in an environment that turned into a room. That's called a holodeck.It's. Not. A. Holodeck.
From what we've seen thus far, it's a combat simulator. Combat simulations utilizing limited holographic elements via holo-emitter technology were seen conducted by both Starfleet and the MACOs in the 2150s already. This is but one of many functionalities that will later be incorporated into the integrated facility known as a holodeck, along with the recreational purpose of the facility seen aboard the NCC-1701 in "The Practical Joker" (which was actually planned for the third season of the original live action show but never came to fruition until the cartoon).
Guess you're gonna need to make another one of those "non-canon" memes for "Flashback" (VGR) then, because in context of everything else it seems to indicate otherwise.The computer said "hologram battle simulation complete" sure. But they were in an environment that turned into a room. That's called a holodeck.
Because Discovery is the only Trek going at the moment (bar a possible movie in 2020), and future TV Treks are likely to have the same creative forces behind it, isn't it more accurate to say:
No it isn't. A holodeck is a specific thing, not just "a hologram of a room".But they were in an environment that turned into a room. That's called a holodeck.
How can something that's already been shown in the future be "retconned" to have occurred in the past, in contradiction to canon? My understanding was that retconning could only be performed in a series that happened at a later time in the ST universe, to explain (fix) past inconsistencies. That seems more legit to me than the type of "retcon" you're describing.What we saw tonight was not holodeck technology as previously defined by Star Trek. It was an immersive virtual reality simulation.
Also, even if you were to define what we saw as being holodeck technology, its inclusion in the 23rd Century would be a retcon, and retconning is not new to Star Trek and is not and has never been a problem in the past.
So now you're just rehashing your posts from the beginning of the thread. Hoping the newcomers won't notice? Too bad they were shot down just as quickly this time around, though.Tucker had never seen anything like a holodeck until the Xyrillians showed it to him. Holographic interfaces were also common place on the USS Shenzhou and aboard the Klingon ships, but not anywhere in the original series or the movies.
LAFORGE: I think you're going to enjoy the twenty fourth century, Mister Scott. We've made some pretty incredible advances these last eighty years.
SCOTT: From what I've seen, you've got a fine ship, Mister La Forge. A real beauty here. I must admit to being a bit overwhelmed.
LAFORGE: Wait until you see the holodeck.
...
JANEWAY: It was a very different time, Mister Kim. Captain Sulu, Captain Kirk, Dr. McCoy. They all belonged to a different breed of Starfleet officer. Imagine the era they lived in. The Alpha Quadrant still largely unexplored. Humanity on verge of war with Klingons. Romulans hiding behind every nebula. Even the technology we take for granted was still in its early stages. No plasma weapons, no multiphasic shields. Their ships were half as fast.
KIM: No replicators, no holodecks. You know, ever since I took Starfleet history at the academy, I always wondered what it would be like to live in those days.
Most sites classify the animated series as "questionable canon". In otherwords, the rec room is a non-fact. Using a non-fact to prove the existence of a fact makes no sense.
LOL, no one is "clinging" to TAS to defend this. You just tried to distract everyone with an argument about TAS's official status, which was entirely pointless because we already know you don't care about official status.Which seems more plausible though. A holodeck existing on the Discovery as a normal thing while clinging to the animated series to defend it? Or this being yet another element among many elements of that series that don't belong there?I don't have to tell you the answer. You know the answer
![]()
I've seen no evidence that Discovery has a "fully functional holodeck". Are there physical holo-props? Forcefield-based terrain and interactive objects? Notice how they walked out with their actual guns. This isn't a holodeck yet. It's laser tag. Yes, "early stages"."Early stages" does not mean having a fully functional holodeck which hides the entire room, creates the illusion of depth and prospective. Geordie was talking in the context of technology advances in the last 80 years when he said "wait until you see the holodeck".
And now, this thread has jumped the shark.Memory alpha acknowledges that there has been no official word from CBS on whether the animated series is canon or not
![]()
And now, this thread has jumped the shark.
This was put up for the first time last night, and was reverted exactly one minute later because "no proof of anything to say that they're not acknowledging it." But you happened to grab a screenshot that minute.
You're either incredibly lucky, or you're 184.59.2.57. You could have at least spelled CBS properly...
Retcon is short for "retroactive continuity," inserting something into something that already happened. Prequels are the perfect opportunity for this.How can something that's already been shown in the future be "retconned" to have occurred in the past, in contradiction to canon? My understanding was that retconning could only be performed in a series that happened at a later time in the ST universe, to explain (fix) past inconsistencies. That seems more legit to me than the type of "retcon" you're describing.
Still diggin DSC.
SPIN
And interestingly, I refresh the page and it is suddenly there, when it wasn't a minute ago.
Is someone have a wiki war over canon right now?
Guess you're gonna need to make another one of those "non-canon" memes for "Flashback" (VGR) then, because in context of everything else it seems to indicate otherwise.
(Takes care of the twin Valtanes and the timeline inconsistency with TUC too!)
EDITED TO ADD:
Oh, and make another one for "Take Me Out To The Holosuite" (DS9)...
SOLOK: I need use of a holosuite. The T'Kumbra holodecks are currently under repair.
SISKO: To arrange holosuite time you have to go through Quark. He owns the only ones on the station.
Even 24th-century holosuites are not properly called holodecks.
People trying to turn nothing into something again I see. Bashir referred to a holodeck on a ship as a holosuite during episode Inquisition. They mean the same thing
BASHIR: So you beamed me out of my quarters into this holosuite when I was asleep.
SLOAN: I believe we allowed you a full hour.
People trying to turn nothing into something again I see.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.