It's magnifying glass, they're actually tiny compared to the corridor.![]()
778 meters!
It's magnifying glass, they're actually tiny compared to the corridor.![]()
778 meters!
You gotta train hard for that promotion!That's a big corridor, they must have been running for miles around that saucer interior.
Looks good to me and fits in well with what we saw of the shuttle bay in the 3rd episode, by the way I was talking about the 1701-A in my comparison when I should have used the 1701 from this time period.![]()
Okay, I'll be the first to have a shot at this (I think). Assuming the decks are the same height as a constitution, estimating that the bridge of the discovery is slightly larger, and marking the decks this is how I believe the 1031 and 1701 compare, size-wise.
Edit: Just to note, obvs the Ent cutaway is without perspective, that shot of the Disco (found on Google) is affected by perspective.
I could see them leaving round'ish nacelles for the Connies, to make them unique.
I thought that round nacelles were out by order of the execs at CBS, don't see how they can have all the ships at the battle with square nacelles and leave the Enterprise 1701 with round ones.I could see them leaving round'ish nacelles for the Connies, to make them unique.
Burnhams style of running freaked me out rather a lot.You gotta train hard for that promotion!![]()
I could see them leaving round'ish nacelles for the Connies, to make them unique.
Cant see it myself, if anything the Discovery's nacelles will be the newest technology with the Europas next and if the Enterprise does have round nacelles it comes last as it is 20 years old plus it will fit with the 1701-A having newer square nacelles when it is built.the Connie might pre-date those ships.
The angular nacelles on the Discovery and the other ships from the fleet could be the predecessors of the Refit's nacelles.
Cant see it myself, if anything the Discovery's nacelles will be the newest technology with the Europas next and if the Enterprise does have round nacelles it comes last as it is 20 years old plus it will fit with the 1701-A having newer square nacelles when it is built.
Cant see them fitting old style nacelles to a brand new ship like the Discovery, cant see an Admiral flying around using old tech either.
Sorry miss-read post.Erm, I said the Connie's would be old.
"pre-date" as in 'before'.
the Connie might pre-date those ships.
The angular nacelles on the Discovery and the other ships from the fleet could be the predecessors of the Refit's nacelles.
The saucer and engineering sections together look about 350m in length could be a bit more say 400m.![]()
Maybe this cutaway of Glenngineering will be of some help.
I saw a post on Facebook where someone guesstimated 650ish meters, much of which being nacelle.
I don't know what the source is for this image (it looks official) but this is from the background image of IMDb. It should help in determining the size and deck layout of the ship if accurate:
![]()
If the Saucer ends up being bigger then so is the Engineering section and by extension the nacelles along with it in which case we could possibly enter into the high 600's or low 700's.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.