And my tardigrade!You have my axe!
And my tardigrade!You have my axe!
Is there a "worst series in the franchise"?The real tragedy here is introducing children to Trek with the worst series in the franchise.
That reminds me of when people say "Star Wars was Not for kids!" And I think to myself "laser swords? All powerful space wizards? Space battles? Evil cyborg?"I don't think it's seen as much as kiddie fare as it being seen as silly in general. I think for most, aliens, ray guns, spaceships, and people dressed in "space uniforms" is too far removed from reality to be taken seriously. It's an immediate turn-off, and probably why a spaceship show will never have humongous ratings on a broadcast network (or maybe any network)
Why would those elements be restricted to kids entertainment?That reminds me of when people say "Star Wars was Not for kids!" And I think to myself "laser swords? All powerful space wizards? Space battles? Evil cyborg?"
I actually think the reason why Star Trek may not appeal to kids anymore is just that they find it boring, too talky, and a bit old hat. In the age of video games, social media, etc., there's far more things out there holds their interest more, IMO.As adults our view of what appeals to kids and what they'd understand is highly skewed.
And Wal-Mart has seriously impacted the business of stores like Sears and JC Penny's because they sell the same products. So yeah Wal-Mart is very much like them, only with groceries so they can do the same to stores like Safeway, Albertson's, Raley's and Kroger's. To me, a supermarket is primarily a grocery store and that's not Wal-Mart.
Which was my point. It's not just a Supermarket.However you like it. But all of your objections to the term 'supermarket' apply equally to the term 'dept. store'. As far as I'm concerned Wal-mart is a supermarket and a dept. store and several other things besides, and none of those things stop it from being any of the others.
I actually think the reason why Star Trek may not appeal to kids anymore is just that they find it boring, too talky, and a bit old hat. In the age of video games, social media, etc., there's far more things out there holds their interest more, IMO.
That reminds me of when people say "Star Wars was Not for kids!" And I think to myself "laser swords? All powerful space wizards? Space battles? Evil cyborg?"
There was an interview with George Lucas on Conan O'brien maybe ten years ago, and he was talking about his new cartoon, and he says "And now this show on cartoon network is watched by a whole new generation of kids...uh..and 30 something's.."
It is rated TV-MA, that tells you it isn’t meant for young viewers.I think that makes this trek unsuitable for young viewers,
Do you skip the ones with "damn", "hell" and "shit" in them?I think that makes this trek unsuitable for young viewers, unlike say TOS or TNG.
You may not enter without proper ID. Since you had to ask, I assume you have none. About face, forward march!I missed it...
Is this thread rated NC-17 or just PG?
![]()
It's not restricted at all, that's just what pops into my head when someone says that Star Wars is not a kids movie.Why would those elements be restricted to kids entertainment?
They’re working towards that future, I have a feeling it will get lighter as the show progresses.That said... the show is hardly spinning a positive future, so perhaps they're not missing out on much.
I personally hated it. A lot. It just feels unnecessary, fundamentally.
Don't confuse your personal preference (which is fine) with the norm for society at large. And how does a TV show cursing "debase society", exactly? That's absurd.Normalizing vulgar language especially for young viewers is unhelpful, and debases our society.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.