Or they lied about it not being a reboot.
On the same level TMP was, yes. A visual update.
Or they lied about it not being a reboot.
Excuse me?We've seen D7-class ships before. They did not look like that.
Which is probably why they DID mention it. There's a crucial line in there where one of Shenzhou's officers points out that the Federation fleet is nearly destroyed, but the Klingon fleet isn't much better off; they'd basically fought each other to mutual exhaustion and both were waiting for reinforcements to arrive.Naw, I was talking about the reaction to the Europa overloading their warp core and self-destruct. That happened back-to-back. But the destruction of the entire Federation fleet is something that should be mentioned on-screen, don't'ya think?
Which kind of supports the theory that Discovery is pretty much a solid reboot of the TOS timeline, yes? If there had been ANY possibility of the classic designs being present in this series, they would have been present in the very first battle. Not here, five episodes later, in a scene when their appearance hardly matters.I was talking about DIS here: The "D7" we saw in this episode was actually a re-use of one of the klingon background ships from the battle of the binary stars. The theory is, that the writers intended to have a more "classic" D7 appear in this episode, but for some real-world reasons (budget, time-constraint, like in ENT: "Unexpected") they ended up re-using one of their already existing CGI models, thus creating a continuity error. In this case: Giving a clearly different ship the designation "D7".
much a solid reboot of the TOS timeline
Depends on the rendering software they're using. If the model was in an old format (which it definitely was) then importing it into whatever system they're using to render the new visuals would be time and therefore money intensive.Much apologizings if this seems like a stupid question, but...how can it be a budget choice to use one CGI model rather than another? Shouldn't it cost basically the same?
Especially since (I assume) there is a CGI model of the real D7 stored somewhere, ready for use as needed. Unless the model was lost somehow, like the Norway class after ST:FC.
On the same level TMP was, yes. A visual update.
On the same level TMP was, yes. A visual update.
.
Excuse me?We've seen D7-class ships before. They did not look like that.
How do you know that?It is a visual reboot, not a story reboot.
How do you know THAT? It easily could be.Soft visual reboot. Not solid.
We saw Klingons in TOS, those rhings in TMP do not look like them!
A reboot of the Prime timelineBecause the producers/writers have said it is Prime Timeline?
What else would it be?
A reboot of the Prime timeline![]()
A reboot of the Prime timeline![]()
Even if it is a visual reboot why did they keep all the Starfleet vessels intact and easily recognisable and completely change the Klingons.Or they lied about it not being a reboot.
Not remotely the same. This is way more drastic that anything in TMP. There is even perfect exampleOn the same level TMP was, yes. A visual update.
I don't know, man, it doesn't make any sense.Even if it is a visual reboot why did they keep all the Starfleet vessels intact and easily recognisable and completely change the Klingons.
I still cant see what they gained by doing that.
They could easily have created a new higher quality D7 model like the one we saw in Star Trek (2009), it wouldn't have cost any more to do, in fact it would have cost much less.
Its almost like they changed their minds half way through or ran out of time maybe, but even that doesn't work as basing a new design on an established one would be far quicker than starting from scratch.I don't know, man, it doesn't make any sense.
TMP updated the look of the Klingon cruisers, yes. But it still kept the basic design, as would be expected for anything taking place in a consistent timeline ("reboot" implies a break in continuity, and it's already been established that DSC is not that).
As for the term "D7", though, I actually suspect that it's strictly a Federation term. Meaning, it's what Starfleet calls the class, not what the Klingons call it. (And it doesn't sound like a Klingon word anyway, does it?) We don't really know what "D7" means, so I suppose Starfleet tacticians could have updated its meaning somehow.
Visual updates improve the makeup used or detailing of the ships used. Even superhero movies, when updating the visuals, tend to keep the general motif of the product they are selling, or flat out say its a reboot/other universe.
This is a completely different model that in no way resembles a D7. Unless the D7 can fold itself in now for some reason and they are running in a mode that makes it unrecognizable as a D7 to the audience.
And we eventually got an explanation for that. We haven't yet had one for this. Although it's still possible.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.