Completely forgot to mention those in my list as well as house of cards. Shame on meWestworld, Better Call Saul, Handmaid's Tale and the Expanse are all quite good.
Completely forgot to mention those in my list as well as house of cards. Shame on meWestworld, Better Call Saul, Handmaid's Tale and the Expanse are all quite good.
Westworld, Better Call Saul, Handmaid's Tale and the Expanse are all quite good.
In Canada we need to subscribe to the space channel to see discovery, it's just a cable channel. That also let's me see the expanse as it airs, I saw the first season at a friend's house and loved it. So $6.99 for (hopefully) two great Scifis is definitely worth it for me.If Discovery is as good as The Expanse, preferably better of course, I'd be good with it. The Expanse is excellent, as is Westworld.
Star Trek was pretty graphically violent for its time.
Are those the arguments people are making?The consistent counter-arguments are "everybody watches it", "everybody does it", "everybody says it", "everybody likes it", etc. Well, thank goodness I'm not everybody. I won't lie and say I never watched or even enjoyed such subject matter. I did. And I outgrew it. I don't care for it anymore.
Your values don't allow hearing a word? Did you feel the same abouts Kirk "hell" or Picard's "merde"? Do you skip those episodes?CBS are, in essence, saying that if I want to watch this new incarnation of Star Trek, I have to make a compromise. I need to eschew a portion of my values. Well, sorry. No. It's not worth it to me.
I think people are trying to understand why more than looking to change your mindI know many of you will see this as silly and even puritanical. That's fine. I really don't care. It's my choice and not open to debate. IDIC, remember?
There’s the option of CraveTV as well.I
In Canada we need to subscribe to the space channel to see discovery, it's just a cable channel. That also let's me see the expanse as it airs, I saw the first season at a friend's house and loved it. So $6.99 for (hopefully) two great Scifis is definitely worth it for me.
CBS are, in essence, saying nothing of the sort. You're saying that and projecting it onto them. Don't imagine that they sat around contemplating how to make people compromise their values or any such nonsense. They just figured most of their audience wouldn't be bothered by a couple of f-bombs and since they were liberated from the usual constraints of network television since they're streaming, they pushed the envelope a bit.CBS are, in essence, saying that if I want to watch this new incarnation of Star Trek, I have to make a compromise. I need to eschew a portion of my values. Well, sorry. No. It's not worth it to me.
"Fuck" will be SOP for cable-network shows within five years to the point it will be considered TV-14. Suits has already come so close several times this season that they may have well just gone ahead.
"Shit" isn't that far away from prime time broadcast, either.
No. If anything, it proves the FCC is realizing that most people talk like that in 2017.Which just goes again to prove that modern television is dreck.
Why would one word make a hundred or more TV shows dreck?Which just goes again to prove that modern television is dreck.
No fucks given yet!I didn't hear the F word tonight. If they did say it, it didn't register with me.
No fucks given yet!![]()
The word is considered the most vulgar expression in existence for the vagina. I don't know why anyone would want to be referred to in that way.Why do Americans find "cunt" so offensive?
On the contrary, from what I've heard, it's not uncommon for males to call good male friends that as an earthy expression of endearment. Considering the etymology, that's kind of puzzling to someone accustomed to American English.I was going to say...don't girls in Britain call good friends cunts sometimes ?
I could just as easily ask "Why do people in the UK and Ireland find 'spaz' so offensive?" (I'm assuming people in Ireland also considers it offensive. If not, disregard that). In the US that's generally not considered a big deal (though it's certainly an insult, albeit a mild one), because the word doesn't carry the same history and weight here, and has largely been divorced from its original connection with describing/mocking the disabled. It's more like calling someone a nerd or awkward or hyper here. Though it's rarely used anymore anyway. That's just how the spread of language works, we don't all put the same emphasis on the same things.Why do Americans find "cunt" so offensive?
I'm not American. I keep hearing how every other Australian uses as you defined it (and I personally agree) "the most vulgar expression in existence for the vagina". As a woman, just as me, I find it offensive and its apparent common usage doesn't make it any less so. Just so not buying the argument that something is made less offensive if it is repeated enough. That whole mantra is about being desensitised.The word is considered the most vulgar expression in existence for the vagina. I don't know why anyone would want to be referred to in that way.
On the contrary, from what I've heard, it's not uncommon for males to call good male friends that as an earthy expression of endearment. Considering the etymogy, that's kind of puzzling to someone accustomed to American English.
Kor
I should have known this would be a waste of time and effort.
I do hope that those who choose to watch Discovery find it enjoyable. See ya round.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.