Ahead of what curve?
Unless the show is live and daily it's going to be on or more than likely behind the curve. Such is the nature of beast. Things can change pretty quickly, even in the time it takes to get one episode on the air.Ahead of what curve?
What, continue to throw a hissy fit over the election like 99% of Hollywood has and attack the members of their fanbase who voting for Trump?
Well someone's obsessed and it doesn't seem to be the folks who lost."I've done far worse than defeat you in the election. I've hurt you. And I wish to go on... hurting you. I shall leave you as your party left office. As you left America. Marooned for all eternity in identity politics and bottomless corruption... buried alive...buried alive."
Right. Which is why i was confused by the previous comment.Unless the show is live and daily it's going to be on or more than likely behind the curve. Such is the nature of beast. Things can change pretty quickly, even in the time it takes to get one episode on the air.
The same way the Federation dealt with aggression in DS9.
My guess is that Lorca and Burnham will fall out over the path to take, perhaps Lorca is a 'the best defence is a good offence' type and Burnham learns through the episodes that there is another way.Reference to Lorca.. "Lorca is a guy who conducts war standing up, as if he’s leading an orchestra". (Jason Isaacs). Sounds like war to me and someone who plays at it like music..
Unless the show is live and daily it's going to be on or more than likely behind the curve. Such is the nature of beast. Things can change pretty quickly, even in the time it takes to get one episode on the air.
Star Trek is (or tries to be) high concept, which is generally more suited for social commentary. But then you also have The Xindi arc, "Homefront," etc. which are political/current events.Are we confusing social commentary with political commentary? Are they the same. I ask because Star Trek is good at social commentary but they have always been more or less neutral rather than actually picking a side. I mean look at Let that Be Your Last Battlefield. They laughed at the odasity of the two but they didn't really pander to the audience saying one was correct over the other. Same with Past Tense. They commented on why things got the way they were but it always seemed more observatory to me than coming up with a solution.
I appreciate good social commentary if it advances the story in an interesting way. Trek has always been great at that and I hope it's the same way with Discovery. Also does all 15 episodes have to be social commentary? Can we get interesting Sci fi plots as well that inspires the imagination? People seem to be transfixed on the political aspects but I want to be inspired watching this show. Like the motion picture said, the human adventure is just beginning.
"I've done far worse than defeat you in the election. I've hurt you. And I wish to go on... hurting you. I shall leave you as your party left office. As you left America. Marooned for all eternity in identity politics and bottomless corruption... buried alive...buried alive."
Actually...yeah.Are we confusing social commentary with political commentary? Are they the same.
Sorry, I just meant the entire internet and other forms of media are already saturated to death with such commentary, so I'm not sure exactly what this is going to add to the mix in a relevant way.
Many of us have said something similar in one of these threads but at some point, we have to define 'entertaining'.
I am greatly entertained by many of Star Trek's political and social allegory episodes, their moral dilemma episodes
Star Trek is (or tries to be) high concept, which is generally more suited for social commentary. But then you also have The Xindi arc, "Homefront," etc. which are political/current events.
That's not how fiction works. It usually has a point of view. Artists are not obligated to be fair,balanced or unbiased. Thats the job of the news.As long as they show a NON-BIASED look at both sides of the coin...I think it will be great.. But if its more like CNN of the future... not so much...
That's not how fiction works. It usually has a point of view. Artists are not obligated to be fare,balanced or unbiased.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.