• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I hope Discovery places "plot" first, avoids melodrama

It sounds like he is talking emotional plot triggers, which we all know haven't changed much in 2500 years.

But we arn't talking about the absence or presence of dramatic trigger situations, but rather what happens when drama forgets the importance of internal logic in a plot, and starts to contrive "emotional spectacle" - just like GFX artists going wild with a fight scene where mountains get demolished for 3 hours would be boring as fuck - just pure spectacle - I suggested that melodrama works in a similar way - when a story is all contrived suffering, its boring, pure "EFX spectacle" - emotional FX - this is why after watching a single soap opera, people usually pick up on the cyclical and coercive nature pretty quick.

But a film, standing alone, self contained, with a logical plot makes the catharsis all the more powerful for it.

This.
 
If it loses it's raison d'etre, there is literally no point it existing anymore vs a million other nondescript dramas, so Tesophius is right, take away the science fiction, and it isn't Star Trek.
No, he said the show would be garbage without the SF elements. Which seems to indicate that the acting, the writing and other elements are garbage and the only thing elevating the show is the SF aspects.
Obviously, a show that explored the same themes as Star Trek with a similar budget, production values and acting skill, wouldn't be Star Trek or Science Fiction, but it wouldn't necessarily be a garbage show because it lacked SF elements.
 
Irrelevant of people's views on science fiction, the thread was never really about that - it was about this:

A lot of modern TV drama does not actually write "arcs" - it writes one episode's worth of emotional material across fifteen episodes - that isn't an arc - its a soap.

I don't want that to be where Trek goes.

Note in B5's legendary long arcs, they didn't just drag out one emotional trigger for three seasons; everything built on the last thing; the shadows did something outrageous, and then topped it - Londo sunk to new depths, then lower still, then surprised us again by reaching new realizations - the Narn tragedy unfolded in the most shocking of ways, didn't just get postponed for six seasons, and G'Kar grew into something different. Some modern arcs, aren't arcs at all in this sense.
You realize that story arcs can be of different lengths/durations - right?
 
I want more Farscape than B5. Go nuts with it. Make it fun.

In all seriousness, I hope it has its own identity and makes it's mark on the franchise.
 
A lot of modern TV drama does not actually write "arcs" - it writes one episode's worth of emotional material across fifteen episodes - that isn't an arc - its a soap.
I really don't see anyone arguing for this point. I could be wrong, but the idea of constantly delaying the resolution of an emotional point is an "arc."

Storytelling is always a balancing act of character moments and plot points but neither of those need to be sacrificed in the name of the other. I prefer the Kelvin movies because they form a cohesive character arc, while having a self-contained story.

I think Netflix's "Daredevil" is a good example of this as well, especially season 1, with all of the major players being introduced with their end goals and methods not always perfectly aligned. I'm hoping for that kind of character conflict, where Burnham having one way of solving a problem vs. Lorca, and even the Klingons have different points of view. and possible conflicts of how resolve the problem of the Federation.

That's what I want. Not sure why "arcs" are being conflated with poor storytelling.
 
Let's look at Balance of Terror.

That basic plot was done in 1959 and on a WWII submarine for the film Up Periscope.
Not to mention, it was done in The Enemy Below from 1957 from two years earlier, which is not only crystal clear but also it was admitted allegedly to Harlan Ellison by BoT's author Paul Schneider that he had adapted that story to make BoT, and possibly also with influences from Run Silent, Run Deep from 1958.
 
Not to mention, it was done in The Enemy Below from 1957 from two years earlier, which is not only crystal clear but also it was admitted allegedly to Harlan Ellison by BoT's author Paul Schneider that he had adapted that story to make BoT, and possibly also with influences from Run Silent, Run Deep from 1958.
I love that movie :)

VJFdL7j.jpg
 
.

In all seriousness, I hope it has its own identity and makes it's mark on the franchise.

I think it will certainly have that. Whatever it is, I think it will be distinctly different from what we've had before, and hopefully begin a new Trek for a new generation/era. I enjoyed the JJ films a lot, but they were modern remakes of old Trek, not new Trek in any real sense. This show has the opportunity to do something genuinely new.
 
I think it will certainly have that. Whatever it is, I think it will be distinctly different from what we've had before, and hopefully begin a new Trek for a new generation/era. I enjoyed the JJ films a lot, but they were modern remakes of old Trek, not new Trek in any real sense. This show has the opportunity to do something genuinely new.

Yep, and I find that part of it really exciting, which is exactly why I say screw canon. Just give me a good series.
 
Trying to think of Trek episodes I really enjoyed and that are generally considered to be "good"

Balance of Terror

Best of Both Worlds

The Visitor

Darmok

I wonder how they would fit in this argument....

These are all character stories, or the character stories justify their existence. BoBW may have started with the big idea to have a huge Borg cliffhanger, but once the story process began, it was written from a perspective motivated by character.

Balance of Terror: A character drama about how war destroys people and sabotages relationships. Kirk and the Romulan commander would have been friends without war, Styles might not have harbored his bigotry, and Angela Martine and Robert Tomlinson would have survived and had the hope of a happy marriage. We learn a lot about all these characters, and how they react to things.

Best of Both Worlds: A story about Riker's ambivalence about taking on a captaincy of his own. He gets pushed further to think about it than ever before, first by Shelby's transfer, then by Picard's assimilation.

The Visitor: By far the most character-driven of all of these, it uses a science fiction premise to delve deeply into the relationship between Jake and Ben. Not only is this episode important as a stand-alone, it underscores how unready Jake is for Ben to leave, and how much he has to grow up by the time Ben finally does leave.

Darmok: Similar to Balance of Terror, it's a character drama that's almost the flipside of Balance of Terror's tragedy. Here, Picard and Dathon actually get to bond as the friends Kirk and the Romulan commander wanted to be.

Just for fun, some of the other universally-acclaimed stories certainly fit as well:

City on the Edge of Forever: We learn what line Kirk is willing to cross in the tension between love and duty. We even get to know Keeler quite well.

Amok Time: It's not just about Spock's arranged marriage, but about Kirk's utter devotion to him. The beautiful line "Isn't that worth a career?" speaks volumes.

The Trouble with Tribbles: Largely a farce, we still see Kirk's frustration and handling of bureaucracy, but everyone gets great moments.

Duet: How much can Kira forgive?

Far Beyond the Stars: An episode about Sisko further coping with his increasing visions as Emissary, as well as the important themes on representation.

Year of Hell: A tragedy about Annorax.

Cogenitor: Character, character, character.

Similitude: Character, character, character.

The Forge trilogy: Archer's journey toward understanding Vulcan, Soval's journey toward understanding humans. T'Pol's closure on her relationship with her mother.
 
I just hope the serialization actually involves big important things happening, and not just some Emo angst that has nothing to do with anything, but continues over the course of the season and the series.

Kor
 
Story and characters first; plot is relatively unimportant. Most of my favorite TV and movies abound in what nitpickers call "plot holes." That includes Star Trek.

How about "plot ideas" and "plot details"? Details are always going to have more holes than a swiss cheese factory, but the main ideas told can hold interest more than the details.

How characters interact to the plot's proceedings is always going to be more interesting than just soap opera. Nobody cares if some officer shared saliva with a commander, though his being the age of her father didn't really get brought up too much, the idea of her going back (thanks to whittled down exposition from Guinan) was more compelling, and what it led to in later episodes - even if the later episodes did nothing with what's a pretty cool paradoxical concept in the first place.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top