I don't know, I would like to see kelvin timeline Sybok and Michael make an appearance^ as long as no one is fighting with God, and Sybok is not messing up with everyone's mind.Not Trek V.
I don't know, I would like to see kelvin timeline Sybok and Michael make an appearance^ as long as no one is fighting with God, and Sybok is not messing up with everyone's mind.Not Trek V.
My post was in reference to the last 6 Star Trek films (ST VIII-XIII) being about revenge. The only other revenge film in among the 13 Trek films is TWOK (ST II).I meant Trek V has no significant revenge motive. I quite like the movie, despite its shortcomings and I like Sybok.
There's plenty of good Star Trek stories that have been made with out a villain (in a traditional sense). Not having a standard villain doesn't mean you're fighting a mute force, and that doesn't mean you need crew infighting.The one thing about having an antagonist is that they provide the voice of whatever you're up against - they speak for the other side, so you're not just battling a mute force. I suppose we could have crew in-fighting, though, about how to handle something.
The Checkbook said:RAY: Shouldn't you be yelling at me, or something?
DEBRA: Ray, when you're on the Titanic you lower the lifeboats. You don't stop to yell at the iceberg.
The Grail cup could be the thing that restores Shatner-Kirk to Pine-Kirk in the cold open scene remake of the Deadly Years. I love it when a plan comes together.I've said a bunch of times...if they really wanted to knock the ball out of the park with one of these nuTrek movies by making a fun, action-packed adventure while also appeasing Trek fans...they could go a very simple and obvious route:
Borrow the formula from Raiders of the Lost Ark and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and adapt it to the Trek universe!
Write an adventure story about the Enterprise racing to various exotic locations on a treasure hunt of some kind (sci-fi wonder and all that). Have the villains be evil competitors. Plot twists, wise cracks, hero gets the girl, swashbuckling...but also discovery on alien worlds and a good sci-fi premise.
I would think this would practically write itself...and would be so much fun.
But, alas. I am but a wee fanboy.
^Reminds me of The Chase.
I was thinking something a bit more ambitious, The Chase could have benefitted from being stretched out to a story arc of three to four episodes.But, same idea. I actually thought "The Chase" was the TNG episode with the most unrealized potential. Great idea...lousy follow-through. Should have at least been a 2-parter.
The sci-fi aspect is actually the weakest part of Interstellar, IMO. It's so generic and predictable. Indeed, my first time seeing the movie I went in "clean" with no spoilers and had the whole thing figured out within forty minutes.When I watched Interstellar the first thought which occurred to me was, I wish this was a Star Trek film. It combines wondrous scifi elements with a fairly basic father-daughter story, without using the scifi elements purely as window dressing.
I'm not sure what your point is. Good Trek has been made with out a standard villain. I watched Yesterday's Enterprise the other day. They don't argue with any villain in it.You can't argue with a non-sentient asteroid. Only about what to do with it.
Bit of a non-sequitur.You can't argue with a non-sentient asteroid. Only about what to do with it.
Keep magical time travelling bookcases from the Nth dimension out of Star Trek, please.When I watched Interstellar the first thought which occurred to me was, I wish this was a Star Trek film. It combines wondrous scifi elements with a fairly basic father-daughter story, without using the scifi elements purely as window dressing.
I'm not sure what your point is. Good Trek has been made with out a standard villain
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.