So, the "Torchbearer..."
- Thread starter Mudd
- Start date
Of the named klingons they've shown I can tell the difference between them.
Also that suit is for only one character so we'll know who it is
I do wonder how that fight plays out between Burnham and the Klingon. When "Iron Man" fights in the movie's we always get to see Stark's facial reactions inserted into the mix. Not to mention he like most superhero's always seem to loose their mask,face gear in the big battle scene's.
Jason
If by Latin, you mean Hebrew (for the Old Testament) and Greek (for the New Testament) than you have a point.
I have a feeling that the 'redesign' of the Klingons is not a simple "we've redesigned the whole lot of them and that's that sorry!".
Harberts' comments are not as black and white as they seem, either.
“In the different versions of Trek, the Klingons have never been completely consistent,” said Harberts. “We will introduce several different houses with different styles. Hopefully, fans will become more invested in the characters than worried about the redesign.”
I mean, what's actually being said here? A complete overhaul of the entire race or just "several different houses with different styles"?
No. His point was that at the end of the Middle Ages... when folks started translating the Bible FROM Latin (the only liturgical language approved by the nearly all-powerful Catholic Church) into the vernacular languages, that was in essence "media piracy" as the Church "owned" the rights to the printing, distribution, and interpretation of the Bible.
I just have a feeling that this sarcophagus ship they find has some "ancient" Klingons on board. Or maybe they were sent out in the galaxy and have came back to Federation(or close to it) and then come back by the black hole the ship is found near.
To me, it would explain the look of the Klingons and their armor. Maybe we haven't seen true Discovery era Klingons yet.
To me, it would explain the look of the Klingons and their armor. Maybe we haven't seen true Discovery era Klingons yet.
The armour is described to be made in tribute to the ancient ways, not that it is from anicent times.
This is from the info plaque at SDCC. It also says only the House of T'Kumva warriors wear it.
Though T'Kumva wants to unite all the houses, he might force them to wear it as well.
Last edited:
Almost certainly so.
What we would now call piracy or theft of intellectual property is also the only reason we have e any of Shakespeare's plays. He never published his plays in order to prevent rival theater companies from staging productions, so the surviving copies are all transcriptions taken by audience members; that's why there's no stage direction (outside the one famous "exit pursued by a bear"). These audience-transcribed folios were then sold by street vendors.
What you're leaving out here is that a) only 18 of his plays were published prior to the First Folio (the legitimate reproduction of his works), and b) the pirated quartos prior to the First Folio bungled his content and were unreliable. Hence the printing of the First Folio by Shakespeare's colleagues. So much for the virtues of piracy.
Isn't Kor or one of the TOS klingons going to be on the show? Do you think they will put him in the new makeup and outfit? What do you do when you have someone who has gone through both with the TOS look and TNG look but doesn't seem to be a fit for this new look since he isn't part of this groups house?
Jason
Jason
Just treat it as a reboot. That's what I'm doing.
Yes.
In terms of visual style, tone and approach this series represents a more determined departure from old Star Trek than the Abrams movies did. Discovery will go on for at least several years and will be a watershed in the way the Franchise is presented.
So, in that sense the old "canon" is now finally dead - which is to say, events that we've seen before may persist and be referred to and not directly overwritten, but it will never be possible to rationalize Discovery into a "fit" with other Trek shows as in the past.
Abrams presented nuTrek as an "alternate universe."
The Star Trek: Enterprise producers built a changed history right into the show's premise to lend reluctant fans a little comfort and room to rationalize.
Not this time. Discovery is now the beginning of a different realization of the "Star Trek universe," one that will not be able to be "Trials And Tribbleation-ed" into the old.
In terms of visual style, tone and approach this series represents a more determined departure from old Star Trek than the Abrams movies did. Discovery will go on for at least several years and will be a watershed in the way the Franchise is presented.
So, in that sense the old "canon" is now finally dead - which is to say, events that we've seen before may persist and be referred to and not directly overwritten, but it will never be possible to rationalize Discovery into a "fit" with other Trek shows as in the past.
Abrams presented nuTrek as an "alternate universe."
The Star Trek: Enterprise producers built a changed history right into the show's premise to lend reluctant fans a little comfort and room to rationalize.
Not this time. Discovery is now the beginning of a different realization of the "Star Trek universe," one that will not be able to be "Trials And Tribbleation-ed" into the old.
Well, look.
Let's take a hypothetical.
Okay, I hate hypotheticals. Once you admit a hypothetical anything is provable.
But still...
In episode twelve, Pike and Spock show up aboard Enterprise. Their uniforms are just like the uniforms we're seeing no on Discovery crew, and Enterprise looks entirely different than in TOS.
Does one of the characters have to say something like "Oh yeah, we went to Talos IV but the place had been eaten by a Doomsday Machine before we got there" in order for us to call this a reboot?
Let's take a hypothetical.
Okay, I hate hypotheticals. Once you admit a hypothetical anything is provable.
But still...
In episode twelve, Pike and Spock show up aboard Enterprise. Their uniforms are just like the uniforms we're seeing no on Discovery crew, and Enterprise looks entirely different than in TOS.
Does one of the characters have to say something like "Oh yeah, we went to Talos IV but the place had been eaten by a Doomsday Machine before we got there" in order for us to call this a reboot?
