Wasn't that old FJ stuff used as on-screen graphics and background bridge chatter for the first three movies?
In two out of the three, and both in situations where they could not possibly have been accurate representations of what the ship really looked like (most explicitly in TSFS, where where the TOS ship is used to represent the refit Enterprise in a graphic).Wasn't that old FJ stuff used as on-screen graphics and background bridge chatter for the first three movies?
Yes, making it clear that the Constitution has never really been the top end of SF's capabilities, even prior to the advent of nuTrek
What do the Constitution's capabilities have to do with the FJ ships shown in on-screen graphics?
Not sure I understand the question.
The FJ graphics show ship classes which are larger than the Constitution, ships which are shown to exist in universe by the very fact they are being shown on screen.
Ergo SF has the capability to build ships larger than Constitution class ships even in Prime 23rd century and have done so.
I didn't mention the Constitution's capabilities......
I misunderstood then. Thanks for the clarification.
But nobody argued against that. FJ Federation-class dreadnoughts are only slightly bigger than the Constitution and nowhere near the JJprise and Vengeance behemoths.
And the phrase "Well shit, you're right, I didn't really think that through" can be equivalent to "No, I totally knew that, you just misunderstood me!"
But somehow I don't think they are.
There's nothing wrong with my attitude, I'm just a terrible PERSON.
Then your argument is invalid.
The post, not the poster.What I get from you here is that you're bright and interesting, but you like being rude, and therefore less interesting.
But that's not what you said. You said the USS Kelvin was "bigger than the Enterprise-D." That is factually incorrect, as length ≠ size.You're not right. As I already said, the ships are too long as well as too massive...
The only class of starship we ever saw in TOS was the Constitution class. So the only factual statement you can make is that they didn't build a larger version of the Constitution class in TOS. You have NO IDEA what other starship classes existed in that time period, because the 1960s TV budget couldn't afford to show them and the 1980s films (arguably) couldn't either.No, because WE could build larger ships if we wanted to, but we don't, and they didn't in TOS.
You're right, aliens never had larger ships in TOS...You're, again, byzantine explanation for why JJ's are larger than TOS' was fun to surf through, but doesn't account for why aliens also have larger ships
It's not radically different. It just LOOKS that way.and why the entire universe is so radically different from TOS
It fits because they SAY it fits. Artistic license is a thing. Fan license is not.That they pay lip service to making things fit doesn't mean it does.
Crazy Eddie said:The only class of starship we ever saw in TOS was the Constitution class. So the only factual statement you can make is that they didn't build a larger version of the Constitution class in TOS. You have NO IDEA what other starship classes existed in that time period, because the 1960s TV budget couldn't afford to show them and the 1980s films (arguably) couldn't either.
Even the USS Excelsior was originally conceived as a much larger vessel than it ended up being; the details of the Search for Spock version imply a ship almost 600 meters long, as do the scenes in TNG where it appears side by side with the Enterprise-D. It was later re-detailed for TUC with surface details consistent with a much smaller size.
So strictly speaking, you're making an argument from absence that is itself totally dependent on inconsistent data.
You're right, aliens never had larger ships in TOS...
![]()
... right?
It's not radically different. It just LOOKS that way.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.