• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery at SDCC - Consolidated Thread

Here is a large version of the front of the ship. Does anyone know where I can get the full poster at this size?
b855dec94c7883ce78afcd7da14883547fcd8894.jpg
 
Second seem more likely. Though I think that I'd be aiming for those connectors if I were the enemy. :eek:
In the same way you'd aim for the neck or nacelle struts of the Constitution/Starship Class or the long thin boom on the Klingon D-7? ;)
 
In the same way you'd aim for the neck or nacelle struts of the Constitution/Starship Class or the long thin boom on the Klingon D-7? ;)

I thought that was why they were redesigning the 23rd century? To get rid of things that were outdated/didn't make sense... :eek:
 
It.. well I like the 'staging' of it. All golden and such. Big round saucer - check. Disproportionate triangular 'body' - check. Weird arse feet - check.
 
Outdated? Yeah.

Don't make sense? You'd be left with only Shatner's toupee.
 
In the same way you'd aim for the neck or nacelle struts of the Constitution/Starship Class or the long thin boom on the Klingon D-7? ;)
The people freaking out about the instability and the weakness of the saucer forget that people said the same thing about the nacelle struts and neck on the TOS 1701. Gene said something to the effect of 'We have no idea what kind of amazing materials they will invent between now and the 23rd century that will be amazingly strong and resilient' So I think that's probably not the issue that people are making it out to be.
 
Second seem more likely. Though I think that I'd be aiming for those connectors if I were the enemy. :eek:
As I've pointed out before, if the shields are down, it doesn't matter where the bridge or a connector is because it's still a sitting duck. If the shields are up they can locate the bridge or a connector anywhere they want. Of course, Nick Meyer and company had that beautifully filmed, epic battle in STII and didn't really follow any of the established rules.

Also, with exotic materials, structural integrity fields, and shields, a saucer with cutouts would be about as sound as an intact saucer.

My guess is all three parts can also separate, further rationalizing the design.

RAMA
 
They look like they could spin as well.

Hope whatever function it has outweighs the four radial turbolift choke points. Swift crew mobility is also a concern of mine with Eaves' similar ring saucer, though site-to-site transport through "waveguides" is an option for newer ships. However, in an emergency, you want crew to be able to move quickly under their own power from place to place, so you want shortest routes. A saucer is damn good for that, until you put gaps between the core and the circumference leaving few radial and annular corridors to use. When transporters and turbolifts are down or diminished, a well designed craft is the difference between life or death.
 
The ship in that poster is ugly and silly looking. Along with that horrid ass alien that senses death and ugly Klingons, this show is not looking good for me. I'm still going to watch the premier with hope, but things aren't good in Star Trek land for me right now.
 
They look like they could spin as well.

Hope whatever function it has outweighs the four radial turbolift choke points. Swift crew mobility is also a concern of mine with Eaves' similar ring saucer, though site-to-site transport through "waveguides" is an option for newer ships. However, in an emergency, you want crew to be able to move quickly under their own power from place to place, so you want shortest routes. A saucer is damn good for that, until you put gaps between the core and the circumference leaving few radial and annular corridors to use. When transporters and turbolifts are down or diminished, a well designed craft is the difference between life or death.[/Quote
They look like they could spin as well.

Hope whatever function it has outweighs the four radial turbolift choke points. Swift crew mobility is also a concern of mine with Eaves' similar ring saucer, though site-to-site transport through "waveguides" is an option for newer ships. However, in an emergency, you want crew to be able to move quickly under their own power from place to place, so you want shortest routes. A saucer is damn good for that, until you put gaps between the core and the circumference leaving few radial and annular corridors to use. When transporters and turbolifts are down or diminished, a well designed craft is the difference between life or death.

Bingo. That's how I feel and how I should've explained myself.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top