• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

(US) Do you support a $15 minimum wage?

Do you support a $15 (or higher) minimum wage in the US?


  • Total voters
    55
If that were true my ancestors picking cotton and sugar would have been be millionaires, now if only those darn masters had bothered to pay em!
According to conservative theory it means slavery had to be a good thing because it kepth inflation down. In fact I think that kind of was one of the arguments for slavery back then. If you freed the slaves it would hurt the economy because you would have to pay people to pick cotton and whatnot.

Jason
 
Well when there are brain-geniuses on the right like this dipshit....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Who could have guessed?
This paper evaluates the wage, employment, and hours effects of the first and second phase-in of the Seattle Minimum Wage Ordinance, which raised the minimum wage from $9.47 to $11 per hour in 2015 and to $13 per hour in 2016. Using a variety of methods to analyze employment in all sectors paying below a specified real hourly rate, we conclude that the second wage increase to $13 reduced hours worked in low-wage jobs by around 9 percent, while hourly wages in such jobs increased by around 3 percent. Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees’ earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016.
----------------------------------------------------

This paper, using rich administrative data on employment, earnings and hours in Washington State, re-examines this prediction in the context of Seattle’s minimum wage increases from $9.47 to $11/hour in April 2015 and to $13/hour in January 2016. It reaches a markedly different conclusion: employment losses associated with Seattle’s mandated wage increases are in fact large enough to have resulted in net reductions in payroll expenses – and total employee earnings – in the low-wage job market. The contrast between this conclusion and previous literature can be explained largely if not entirely by data limitations that we are able to circumvent in our analysis. Most importantly, much of the literature examines the impact of minimum wage policies in datasets that do not actually reveal wages, and thus can neither focus precisely on low-wage employment nor examine impacts of policies on wages themselves.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3878462/Uw-Clean.pdf
---------------
 
Wrong. I can't imagine why you would think this. I've already said upthread that I wish employers would deal fairly with their employees. Does that make me an advocate of crime?
---------------
No but it underestimates human nature, it takes regulation to step in when a system falls down due to the greed or inhumane treatment of one human to another. Do you really think any present day social reform would exist if society waited on employers to treat their employees, servants etc fairly? The state had to force 'wonderful' humans to stop discriminating based on melanin content, (they could not even use the same toilets!) if they can't even get that right what makes you think humans are going to want to hand over more money freely to other humans?
The poor we will always have with us, cos the rich have no intention of sharing...
 
Last edited:
"The 2017 report features the happiness score averaged over the years 2014-2016. For that timespan, Norway is the overall happiest country in the world, even though oil prices have dropped. Close behind are Denmark, Iceland and Switzerland in a tight pack."

And what do these nations have in common? A large middle class, a smaller gap between rich and poor compared to other nations, and a healthy welfare system funded by distribution of wealth via taxes. And guess what IKEA are still making money!

The poorest nations on earth, mainly African countries are way down the bottom, and what do they have in common - absolute poverty, destitution, the idea of a minimum wage is laughable, its probably an ultra capitalists wet dream, except there is no one around to buy their precious consumer goods and make them rich.
When you have a system baaed on a race to the bottom to make money and a shrinking middle class and welfare state that is what you will end up with.
 
Last edited:
According to conservative theory it means slavery had to be a good thing because it kepth inflation down. In fact I think that kind of was one of the arguments for slavery back then. If you freed the slaves it would hurt the economy because you would have to pay people to pick cotton and whatnot.

Jason
And yet such folks had no intentions of selling their products for no money. How did those planters manage to make all that money to build those fancy white homes, by giving their cotton, sugar and tobacco away for free?
 
This is still going on? History tell us what this nation looks like when there isn't a minimum wage.

The poor and brown people seem to always be the sole ills of this nation.
Yeah, but the rich, white people will feel infinitely better about themselves, and isn't that why we're here?
 
[
That may be the way it seems to you, but I mostly blame the atheists.
---------------
Yeah it was all those atheists who went to church on Sundays and then after lunch decided to hang the nig...rs for dessert...Those were the good ole days....
 
It must be down to the fact that religious people tend to be compassiante, generous (i.e paing a decent wage )and want the best for their fellow man. Whilst athesits are out for themselves and have no compassion etc..

When the truth is that ones religious beliefs or lack thereof doesn't make them any more compassionate etc..
 
Yeah it was all those atheists who went to church on Sundays and then after lunch decided to hang the nig...rs for dessert...Those were the good ole days....
Hypocrites and atheists actually have more in common than either like to think.

But I'm interested in what you think about the newly released study showing a loss of work hours for low-wage workers in Seattle, apparently due to increases in minimum wage.
---------------
 
Eh, you don't seem to accept facts or reality much, so I'm not really interested in debating with you. If we can't agree on basic facts, it's not really worth it. You live in a fictional universe. You should be Alex Jones' roommate.
 
That may be the way it seems to you, but I mostly blame the atheists.
Hypocrites and atheists actually have more in common than either like to think.
Nope, sorry. You're not in TNZ. You're not going to continue your pattern of throwing out random insulting drive-by trolling remarks and never backing them up with evidence.

Infraction for trolling. Comments to PM.

As for everyone else, when he makes out of left field trolling comments like that, don't bother asking for an explanation or expecting one to ever come. It won't, because there obviously is no explanation that would justify that statement. Just ignore it or report it. This is what he does on a regular basis.
 
Last edited:
As for people loosing work hours in Seattle that is something that happens everywhere, nowdays. It's away of getting out of having to pay it's workers any benefits. We all know those work hours are still being filled by someone. It has happened to my mom and her co-workers and we live in Oklahoma. Not exactly a haven for liberalism.

Jason
 
But I'm interested in what you think about the newly released study showing a loss of work hours for low-wage workers in Seattle, apparently due to increases in minimum wage.

I'm not sure I've seen any one argue that there wouldn't be some job losses. Should we never strive to do anything to improve peoples lives because there could be some pain involved as we implement new policies?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top