• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Reveal: New transporter design!

transporterroom1.jpg

I like it! Weird and thus awesome.

Plus - body armour!
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!
 
I think they'll use the term Phaser only. I forget which of the early Trek books I read, but in the development stages of TOS, they thought of what to settle on for the weapons, and Phaser was always preferred.

The first is an audio effect applied to a wave form, not a weapon;
The second is the closest you get, but it's just a dazzler device and not even spelled the same;
And the last is not only spelled differently, but it has no use as a weapon, either.

My point stands: phasers don't exist. Thus it's easy to say a phaser weapon can do certain things that a laser weapon cannot. The term LASER was originally used by the Star Trek production team because it was brand new and cool. After a couple years of reflection, and at the recommendation of scientific advisers from, I believe, General Atomics, they changed the name. Nothing could be done about the footage already 'in the can' from the first two pilots. A similar mentality surfaced from Roddenberry about the changed Klingons in The Motion Picture. He suggested we pretend that's how they looked all along.
Agreed. Lasers was not used as it would not function the way GR wanted in the story, and those pistols were never seen again. The idea of a phaser was one that allowed more flexibility in writing, much in the way "plasma weapons" have become in contemporary science fiction.
Also, does that armour remind anyone else of the ill-fated 2013 Star Trek videogame?

bmuploads_2013-02-25_1639_star-trek-vg_feb2013_008.jpg
Unfortunate that the game didn't fair better. I liked see the variety of uniforms.
 
I like the look. It looks retro but if someone in the show doesn't point out how weird they look I think we can all agree the series will be ruined! Also they better break down every week as well!

Jason
 
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!

Frankly I was amazed that it took 6 pages before someone mentioned that. It was the first thing I thought of! As far as the picture....at first I was like "What...the...fuck...!" But then after giving it a good look, I decided that it's actually pretty cool. Now someone said that it didn't match previous transporters, specifically citing Ent and it's look. One of the things that annoyed me about Ent, was that the control console being much smaller than the one in Star Trek and TNG made it feel too advanced for such a piece of machinery.

What I like about the transporter in this pic is that it actually feels like a more primitive piece of equipment. Larger, bulkier, and less refined. Not just a miniature version of the transporter in Star Trek as it was in Ent.
 
What bothers me more then the spinning thing, are the crooked yellow squares that look like a 3 year old cut them out.

screenshotfrom2017-06-2312-22-.png


I realize that is intentional in a Hundertwasser straight lines must be avoided at all cost sort of way, but I just hate the look.

All in all I can see this as being a pre-TOS Transporter room, less as being a post-Enterprise Transporter room. To be fair I do think the Transporter is something that Enterprise depicted as to advanced. Someone here wrote that an Enterprise era Transporter should have looked like one is stepping into a particle accelerator. I agree.

By the way, are those black things floor mats? :wtf: I guess it really could be that the Transporter room was damaged as some here have suggested.
 
You would think after 51 years of real-world production design someone would have changed the transporter room. Well done DSC.
 
This is your hope, not fact. The show is on a niche streaming service. It doesn't need huge ratings, but despite that, it's paid for for 2 seasons already. Don't hyperventilate now..
Everyone says that, but it isn't so.

If the show looks like crap it will die a quick death.
 
I agree and can see why they changed it. But those changes were for the series proper and came along with a design change too. So It never negated the original use of Lasers.



Real world phasers can't either, so I don't think using the word needs to be limited on what real world objects with similar names can do. Star Wars uses the name "lasers" and they could care less about what real world lasers can actually do.



I wonder who thought the "Giant LPs of DOOM" were a good design choice.

Phaser is a fine name...real world phasers phase different things. In Trek, the phaser phases energy....it's an energy weapon. Real world use of the same word doesn't negate it in the way Lasers did. Laser was too specific. Is Laser even used in the Menagerie (only bit of the cage that is actually canon after all.)
 
They look like two huge exhaust fans.

If this were a steampunk transporter, those fans would suck the bits of the transport stream off the pads, divert them into ducts, then eject them down to the planet, where they somehow reassemble themselves.. :hugegrin:
 
Also just noticed: Phaser holster on the leg rather than the hip.

Minor detail but WHAT ELSE DO WE HAVE? lol

It's time for Left-Tenant Lara Croft to go phaser down some Klingons in the Tomb of Kahless I say. Then back home for tea with Holo-Winston....
 
I like the new design. I also really like how they're creating different looks for the show. The two main ships are from different eras and they're going out of there way to make that visually obvious. That should provide for a cool sense of history within the show to the era before it takes place. So far, I'm happy with everything that I've seen!
 
I can't really grok the new transporter, but i like the armor. I"ll give it a chance though; it could be spectacular from another angle or in action.
 
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!
My thoughts exactly! It's actually quite retro, but not in the way anyone would expect for Trek. Although I agree that the close-up of the crooked black squares really makes the set design look cheap and unfinished. I personally like straight lines and don't understand the aversion to them.

The phaser pistol holsters look a little too 21st century tactical. I always liked the simplicity of TOS Velcro to attach things to the belt line.
 
I think this transporter looks weird. Haven't decided if I like it or not, but if the transporter is your "deal breaker" for watching or not watching your not much of a fan anyway.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top