In retrospect they probably jumped the gun releasing that trailer without nailing down the design or the CGI. Probably did more harm than good for people's expectations.I disliked the original design, it looked terrible. The current design looks fine.
This is how I feel. I thought it was ugly as sin in the teaser, but it's now alright. I'm not nerdgasming, but it's reasonable. It's better than the NX01 at any rate.I disliked the original design, it looked terrible. The current design looks fine.
They couldn't win either way. Would have been just as much harm when there was lack of news.In retrospect they probably jumped the gun releasing that trailer without nailing down the design or the CGI. Probably did more harm than good for people's expectations.
It is not just growing on me, I am genuinely starting to really, really like Discovery. It is immediately recognizable as a Starfleet ship (and for non Trek fans as a Star Trek ship) yet it still does its own unique thing.
Remember, fans were imagining the Planet of the Titans Enterprise as much bigger than the original/movie versions as far back as the 1980's. Here's a pic from the USS Enterprise Heavy Cruiser Evolution Blueprints.Here's a very quick and dirty size comparison I threw together, showing how the Discovery might fit next to the two canon ships of this time period at various scalings.
A is the saucer scaled to match the TOS Constitution. This gives the center sphere just four decks, which seems way too small given there are at least three rows of windows on the rim of the inner section. There would barely be room for even a TOS-scale bridge, let alone a bigger one, and the other levels would be super cramped. Overall length is about 305, comparable with the Refit.
B scales the sphere to match the entire bridge superstructure of the Constitution. This allows five-six decks that are small but useable. Length is about 400 meters.
C goes maximalist and scales to the Kelvin. It would be much bigger though - the Kelvin saucer is extremely thin, barely holding two decks for most of its width. This Discovery would be 610 meters - not quite Kelvin-Enterprise but really big. The sphere would be nine-ten decks, nearly as thick as the TOS saucer overall. I think this one overshoots.
![]()
![]()
She might be a bit bigger than the Connie as she may be a newer design. The constitution was not really huge and was already being over lapped in size by 4 years,after the TOS, which she was what 25 or 30 years old by that point?I'm tired of the giant ships. I don't believe them.
Can I get permission to use this image in an upcoming YouTube video please? Couldn't quite work out who owns this image...
Dave CombeCan I get permission to use this image in an upcoming YouTube video please? Couldn't quite work out who owns this image...
Can I get permission to use this image in an upcoming YouTube video please? Couldn't quite work out who owns this image...
Are you on FB? He's a fellow mod on a DSC group. I could put you in touch.Couldn't find this member?
Is that from David Combe too? Do you know how can I get hold of him please?There's also this image right here.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.