• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Trek Actor Running For Congress

AutoAdmin

Machine of Death
Administrator
A new news article has been published at TrekToday:

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine‘s John G. Hertzler (General Martok) is running for Congress. The former actor will challenge Republican Tom Reed...

Continue reading...
 
Martok! Martok! Oh, I mean Hertzler.

Did I read that article right; is he going to be Mark Twain for Congress?
 
This sounds cool but I think Lord Buckethead beat him in terms of creating a campaign character.

Jason
 
"Hertzler will run “in the persona of Mark Twain ...”

So this is a non-serious effort, a gag or publicity stunt?
 
Hopefully he'll take his bat'leth with him. That'll sort out those clowns in congress. What a bunch of clowns.
 
If it's a stunt, they should get Jerry Hardin to run "as Mark Twain" ;)
Especially since I remember long ago he continued to play Mark Twain after Trek on the stage. I think he must have a very strong interest in the guy or the guy as how he performed him.

Jason
 
I would rather have a Klingon in the White House than what we have there now (I know John Hertzler is running for Congress, I'm just sayin')
 
Hopefully he'll take his bat'leth with him. That'll sort out those clowns in congress. What a bunch of clowns.

The 'clowns' in question being the idiots on the GOP side in the Trump cabinet, and not Obama (he was a better POTUS than the current occupant.)
 
As much as I like Mr. Hertzler as an actor, if he actually runs as "Sam Clemens" he is just handing the election to the incumbent. Besides, will he be speaking his core values, or those he attributes to Mr. Clemens? This guy will be making decisions in our stead, it might be a good idea to know where HE stands on the issues. If his position in "I hate Trump" I can't vote for him - HATE is not a Democrat Party value (or at least it wasn't). How will he address Global Warming? Energy production? Agriculture issues? Legal vs non-legal immigration (so these people don't get turned into slaves)? Human trafficking? Assuming that just because he is a Democrat he will be better than "Any Republican" is actually a prejudice remark, and is not a Democrat value... or at least not historically.

We COULD have had a really honest guy in the White House with a long history of standing up for the little guy and minorities. But Mrs. Clinton and the DNC stole the Party's nomination. She then ran one of the least exciting and tedious campaign in my memory (which goes back to Nixon). It was Hillary Clinton's election to lose, and she did exactly that.

Bernie Sanders would have beaten Donald Trump like a rented mule. Mrs. Clinton never actually won a majority of the popular votes needed to win her party's nomination, so I never saw has as a truly legitimate candidate anyway. Unfortunately, I was not able to write in Mr. Sanders' name on the ballot in my county, so I wrote in Jill Stein.

And it was not "The Russians" or "The E-mails" that sunk Mrs. Clinton. It was Mrs. Clinton's supporters. Several of my friends voted for Trump. But any time a liberal or pollster asked who they were voting for, they said "Hillary all the way!". Just as I did, though I had no intention of voting for her. And they were not alone. It seems as though this was happening all over the place. Their other friends, relatives, co-workers who supported Trump all told pollsters and liberal friends/coworkers/relatives that they were voting for Hillary. That made it seem like EVERYONE was voting for Hillary, which made her loss even harder to accept.

WHY did they lie? Very simply it was to avoid the reaction to anyone who was not voting for "HER". The "You're smarter than that", or "I'm so disapointed in you" comments. Hearing for an HOUR how bad "Dubya" was (which I never understood, since he was not running). Getting called a racist, bigot, homophobe, NAZI, sexist, was just icing. Do you really think that is how you win an argument or convince someone to come over to your side of an issue? Call them names? Did that ever work on you?

You younger Democrats need to grow the hell up before 2018, or we're going to lose again. I don't even want people to know I'm associated with you at this point.
 
Obama (he was a better POTUS than the current occupant.)
Difficult to say, Trump has only been in office for five months. It will (in time) be easier to evaluate who was the better president after the end of Trump's second term in office.
And it was not "The Russians" or "The E-mails" that sunk Mrs. Clinton.
In the case of "the Russians" I would agree, however I disagree that Clinton's management of her Emails wasn't a fairly major factor in the election.
Bernie Sanders would have beaten Donald Trump
That supposes that the majority of Clinton's supporters would have transferred their support to Sanders. Sanders was probably too far left for some of the moderate and mainstream democrats to support in the election.

Clinton did better with older democrats than Sanders did, but would those same older people have voted for Sanders? Many would likely not voted at all, or voted for Trump or a third party.

Left of center voters can be fiscal conservatives, and some of Sander's campaign platform ideas were very expensive, more so than either Clinton"s or Trump's.
 
Last edited:
For him not to be the worst president in American history he'd pretty much have to reverse every single policy decision he's made in the first five months and say every single campaign promise he made besides the vague chanting slogans were lies.

The numbers suggest Sanders would have beaten Trump but it's hard to tell from those how people would have actually voted on election day. But given a woman lots of people intensely hate won the popular vote and lost by virtue of a 1% margin in specific swing states that voted for Obama twice because of the working class voters Sanders addresses in his policies directly, and Sanders would have at the very least drastically increased turnout among college voters, it seems likely he would even for having very far left economic policies. As you said, we can never know.

I hope Hertzler is not running as a character. Great for getting internet shares not great for getting serious voter investment.
 
The 'clowns' in question being the idiots on the GOP side in the Trump cabinet, and not Obama (he was a better POTUS than the current occupant.)
It's just a Simpsons joke.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
For him not to be the worst president in American history he'd pretty much have to ....
Trump's approval numbers are between 38% and 50% (different polls), the Russia Influence thing looks like it's dissolving on front of his opponents eyes.

To be seen as a good president he primarily need to focus on the economy and jobs.

None of the things you mentioned will influence whether or not Trump is seen as a better president than Obama.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top