• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Wonder Woman (2017)

Looking at various websites just now, it seems the tracking has the domestic launch anywhere from $80-100 million and another $75-100 million oversea's. Taking the middle ground from those projections, we're talking about $175 million global total for a $130 million blockbuster...

Good start :techman:
 
Yeah, Wonder Woman has usually killed (although its usually a last resort in the good WW comics, she's not some bloodthirsty warrior or anything
Exactly. The article is an explanation for a question that no one asked. Wonder Woman kills when she has to.
 
WVg16oM.jpg


It's nice that Batman's trying :D
 
Maxwell lord comes to mind, obviously.

SNAP!

I'm just feeling in the back of my head, that Diana might find it a lot easier to kill men, since she was three thousand years old before she saw her first man, so they are not exactly "people" to her.
 
It is interesting that they started WW in the World War 1 period rather than World War 2 when the character started in the comics.
 
I'm glad they did, WWI hasn't been used in movies anywhere near as much. Setting in WWI also helps a bit with preventing to many comparisons with the first Captain America movie.
 
I'm glad they did, WWI hasn't been used in movies anywhere near as much. Setting in WWI also helps a bit with preventing to many comparisons with the first Captain America movie.
It also takes away the evil Nazis element from the story and any good guy/bad guy element to the war that Wonder Woman is facing.
 
They probably would have stuck with WWII if not for Captain America: The First Avenger doing the same thing so recently. But (and I say this without having seen the movie yet) I actually really like the switch to WWI and I think it fits Diana's character and motivation in the DCEU much better, since by the time of BvS she had withdrawn from "Man's World" after witnessing the atrocities committed during the Great War. Obviously WWII was even more devastating, but in some ways that was a far more black-and-white conflict, while WWI was largely pointless and only ended up making things worse. It's very easy to see how something like that could have turned Diana cynical and convinced her to avoid the outside world for so long.
 
Yet, they could not get away from showing the Germans as butchers, as the killers of civilians. Sadly, some of the Germans were butchers in the war. I am thinking about the atrocities committed in Belgium - the Rape of Belgium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_of_Belgium

Yes and it was mostly Europeans killing Europeans for largely grandiose Imperial aims and as a result you had a) the recruitment and use of soldiers/laborers of non-European descent from European colonial possessions and b) the campaigns against the Ottoman Empire, which was just another colonial venture in the light of Sykes-Picot and the LoN Mandates.

Regardless of the crimes of the Germans, the French and British were shown to be no better (like Germany in Belgium) in dividing up and administrating the possession of the defeated powers (such as the overseas possessions of Germany or the territory of the Ottoman Empire which lead to problems that persist to this day with Syria/Iraq) or with the Australians and Americans in rejecting the Racial Equality Clause for the League of Nations.
 
Last edited:
Well, the American government rejected joining the League of Nations anyway when we didn't ratify the Treaty of Versailles.

In terms of the shelling of the village by the Germans that plays into the part about certain Germans wanting to continue the conflict, even though trying to negotiate an armistice.
 
Fox News Gets Mad That Wonder Woman Isn't in Her American Apparel Underwear
Leave it to Fox News to get pissed that a movie starring a Greek demi-goddess isn’t American enough... and this isn’t even the first time.

During Friday’s episode of Your World with Neil Cavuto, host Cavuto got into it with guests Dion Baia and Mike Gunzelman about about actor Gal Gadot’s lack of red, white, and blue on her Wonder Woman costume... well, technically just the white (man, Fox News is really obtuse about double-meanings, even when they’re accidental).

“Nowadays, sadly, money trumps patriotism,” Baia said. “Especially, recently, I personally feel like we’re not really very patriotic, the country, in a certain sense.”

“I think the Hollywood aspect, we see this time and time again, it’s cool to hate America these days,” Gunzelman added.

Barring the fact that teaming up with an American to save our European allies during a World War is the quintessential definition of not hating America (even if they changed which world war it was), this analogy fails to address or even acknowledge what Diana’s original costume meant, and how it’s changed over the decades. In the character’s earliest appearances in the silver age of comics, Wonder Woman wore the flag as her costume because, in-universe, she was representing the Amazons to America... and out of universe, we were in the middle of World War II.
Yes, because these are the real roots of Wonder Woman! Patriotism, American Way and... bondage? I don't know...

wwbondageww2.jpg
 
Weekend estimates are out and it looks like

$100.5 million opening weekend domestic launch
$122.5 million overseas

$223 million total :techman:
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top