• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Do people still believe in Hell?

@Coloratura - J, is that you? Been quite a long time since I've been round these parts!

So... yeah, Hell is quite possibly the dumbest idea in religion. As there's been a lot of discussion of the "Old Testament", aka the Tanakh, might as well toss in a Jewish perspective on all of this.

There is no conception of Hell in Judaism as Christians would understand it, as the idea of God creating something He loves so much and then throwing it away in what amounts to a cosmic dustbin for all eternity is utterly ludicrous. The few references to the afterlife in the Torah are to sheol (grave in Hebrew), which is basically a matter-of-fact statement that all human beings must, ultimately, die and be interred in the grave. Hell is ultimately a Greek idea, a melding of Jewish eschatology with the ideas of European pagan religion on the underworld.

It makes no sin greater or less than another. Sin was once described as "menstrual rags" before God. God's holiness is that high of a standard, which is why the Levitical law is so detailed. That's the standard, and it's impossible to keep every letter of that law.

The Levitical law, or halacha, is basically an attempt by the Jews to create a civilization based around justice and order, compared with lawless surrounding tribes. The 613 mitzvot are so detailed so as to set us apart from those and attempt to give the Jews of the time a better way of life - hence a lot of laws about how to treat the poor, guidelines in warfare, etc. There's a lot of stuff that was wrong back in the Middle East then that needed put right, so when making guidelines for His own people God had a lot of ideas on where civilization had gone wrong previously.

Another thing about halacha is that while God's word is unchanging, how we as Jews follow it and interpret it can change depending on the way the world is at that point. I doubt whether when the Torah first appeared people needed to consider the internet or gender fluidity, both of which are topics that are currently debated among Jews and regarding which there are a variety of perspectives depending on whether you're Reform, Conservative, or Orthodox. The idea that it's some kind of frozen, obsolete law that's been surpassed yet still needs to be obeyed is crud - how to live according to it in today's world is one of the most pressing issues in Jewish culture today.

God's also not going to hold everyone accountable beyond what they could have known, nor is He going to force people to be in His presence, i.e. "Heaven" if they didn't want to be with Him in the first place.

Here's the thing about God, at least as we Jews see him: He's a pretty forgiving guy. He isn't some guy sitting up in heaven watching people like some kind of cosmic hall monitor giving people infractions for the wrong kind of sex, or believing the wrong thing. To be on God's good side in Judaism, the Law can be boiled down pretty simply: to update Rabbi Akiva's famous words when asked to summarize the Torah standing on one leg: don't be a dick, the rest is commentary. That's really all God asks of us, if He is asking anything. Doesn't matter if you're an atheist, a Jew, a Muslim, a Christian, a Buddhist or anything else - as long as you're not a dick to others, you're in God's good books no matter what your thinking is on God's existence (or lack thereof).

Evil, by it's nature, is the opposite of God's nature.

Here's the thing: God gave you an "evil", self-serving side, and a "good" altruistic side. They're both His creation, and both are meant to be indulged up to a point. Neither is "bad" unless we serve one exclusively. Take marriage and starting a family as a good example. When I met my wife, my first thought was "Wow, she's hot". I had a lot of thoughts that some in Christianity would regard as sinful and impure, "evil" and lustful but after those initial thoughts spurred our relationship they gave way to other, "good", altruistic thoughts about how I could make her happy, and how I could provide a good life for her and my kids.

The yetzer hara ('evil' inclination) and the yetzer hatov (good inclination) are both from God, and they're intended to work in tandem to keep us on the right path. Usually they go against God's nature when we serve one to the exclusion of the other, either becoming entirely selfish and truly evil, or so altruistic that we forget that we're also here to live our own lives too and fall prey to fulfilling the selfish indulgences of others to our own detriment.

God's holiness is the key point.

I've never got the idea of the "cosmic checklist" God of some versions of Christianity, which appears to amount to obeying the Law of God for a fear of damnation and eternal separation from God. That's just... strange. You can't ever really be apart from God as the "spark" of God is what makes existence... exist.

God's holiness is made manifest through the world (cf: Isiah 6:3/Kedushah), and the Law of Moses was given in love for the people of Israel, and is intended to make our lives in this world better, rather than in any expectation of reward in the next. This is obvious from the fact that Judaism mandates that we say the berachot before performing a mitzvah - Baruch atah Hashem, elokeihnu melech ha-olem, asher kidshanu b'mitzotav... (whatever we are doing now... eg. lighting shabbat candles) - blessed are you Hashem our God, sovereign of the universe, who has made us holy with His commandments - this is meant to thank God for a precious gift intended to make our lives better in this world, rather than begging Him not to be terrible to us in the next.

The original intent is that God's holiness is made manifest through all human beings living good, moral lives whatever they believe, rather than living in fear of something terrible after death. To be quite frank, the afterlife, how to get into it and how to avoid "the bad place" are what's messing up the world at the moment. Too many fundamentalist Christians ignore Deuteronomy 30:19:


Choosing life and not being overly obsessed with and worrying about what comes after is the name of the game, folks. Some atheists are much, much better at that than many of the more pious believers...
 
Well, even the pope doesn't seem to mind atheists all that much:


In my own Catholic upbringing it was always stressed that it's important to be a good person and show compassion. Being a Grade A believer was secondary at best. :p

And by the way: I always like the Catholic Church best when it criticizes capitalism. :p That does seem like a very Christian thing to do. Being a voice for the poor.
One of the reasons I really like Pope Francis is his dedication to the poor. Whilst no man is perfect, he seems to really work hard to lift people out of poverty, both financial and social.

@Coloratura - J, is that you? Been quite a long time since I've been round these parts!

Lemons! *hug*
Yeah, it's me. I wanted a more musical username. :D

So... yeah, Hell is quite possibly the dumbest idea in religion. As there's been a lot of discussion of the "Old Testament", aka the Tanakh, might as well toss in a Jewish perspective on all of this.

There is no conception of Hell in Judaism as Christians would understand it, as the idea of God creating something He loves so much and then throwing it away in what amounts to a cosmic dustbin for all eternity is utterly ludicrous. The few references to the afterlife in the Torah are to sheol (grave in Hebrew), which is basically a matter-of-fact statement that all human beings must, ultimately, die and be interred in the grave. Hell is ultimately a Greek idea, a melding of Jewish eschatology with the ideas of European pagan religion on the underworld.



The Levitical law, or halacha, is basically an attempt by the Jews to create a civilization based around justice and order, compared with lawless surrounding tribes. The 613 mitzvot are so detailed so as to set us apart from those and attempt to give the Jews of the time a better way of life - hence a lot of laws about how to treat the poor, guidelines in warfare, etc. There's a lot of stuff that was wrong back in the Middle East then that needed put right, so when making guidelines for His own people God had a lot of ideas on where civilization had gone wrong previously.

Another thing about halacha is that while God's word is unchanging, how we as Jews follow it and interpret it can change depending on the way the world is at that point. I doubt whether when the Torah first appeared people needed to consider the internet or gender fluidity, both of which are topics that are currently debated among Jews and regarding which there are a variety of perspectives depending on whether you're Reform, Conservative, or Orthodox. The idea that it's some kind of frozen, obsolete law that's been surpassed yet still needs to be obeyed is crud - how to live according to it in today's world is one of the most pressing issues in Jewish culture today.



Here's the thing about God, at least as we Jews see him: He's a pretty forgiving guy. He isn't some guy sitting up in heaven watching people like some kind of cosmic hall monitor giving people infractions for the wrong kind of sex, or believing the wrong thing. To be on God's good side in Judaism, the Law can be boiled down pretty simply: to update Rabbi Akiva's famous words when asked to summarize the Torah standing on one leg: don't be a dick, the rest is commentary. That's really all God asks of us, if He is asking anything. Doesn't matter if you're an atheist, a Jew, a Muslim, a Christian, a Buddhist or anything else - as long as you're not a dick to others, you're in God's good books no matter what your thinking is on God's existence (or lack thereof).



Here's the thing: God gave you an "evil", self-serving side, and a "good" altruistic side. They're both His creation, and both are meant to be indulged up to a point. Neither is "bad" unless we serve one exclusively. Take marriage and starting a family as a good example. When I met my wife, my first thought was "Wow, she's hot". I had a lot of thoughts that some in Christianity would regard as sinful and impure, "evil" and lustful but after those initial thoughts spurred our relationship they gave way to other, "good", altruistic thoughts about how I could make her happy, and how I could provide a good life for her and my kids.

The yetzer hara ('evil' inclination) and the yetzer hatov (good inclination) are both from God, and they're intended to work in tandem to keep us on the right path. Usually they go against God's nature when we serve one to the exclusion of the other, either becoming entirely selfish and truly evil, or so altruistic that we forget that we're also here to live our own lives too and fall prey to fulfilling the selfish indulgences of others to our own detriment.

Oh mercy, you have no idea how good it feels to see you around here again. *hugs*

The funny thing is that Judaism helped me out of Christianity. When I was in my early 20s, and really wanted to know more about my faith from outside its walls, I wanted a fresh look, so I figured why not seek out the people who got it rolling with old Abraham himself, and started corresponding with Rabbis, and those who studied the theology. I found out rather quickly that most Evangelical Christianity had no idea the foundations of the very faith they claimed to follow to the letter, and thought "if that fundamental understanding is wrong," I wondered, "what else could be wrong?" That revelation was one of the first major cracks in my fundamentalist armor.

To me, Judaism is a study of human nature, and how to live in the world as best as one can. If I had to sum up what I understand of Judaism, in one word, it would be "moderation." You like to drink wine? Moderation. Eating good food? Moderation. Work? Moderation. Play? Moderation. Study? Moderation. There is time in life to enjoy all of these things without giving into and submitting to them, in order that they should have power over you. Be human, just don't wallow in everything to the point of excess.

Modern Christianity, on the other hand, seems to dwell more on the idea that you're not of this world, you don't belong in it, and if you participate in it you're a hellbound sinner deserving of hell. I mean, it is an utter denial of human nature. The first step in Christianity is that you are bad, you are broken, and you deserve to burn in hell. It's fundamentally *cough* flawed.
 
There is no conception of Hell in Judaism as Christians would understand it, as the idea of God creating something He loves so much and then throwing it away in what amounts to a cosmic dustbin for all eternity is utterly ludicrous.

Wait, is this the same vengeful and nasty Jewish God who figured he'd just send a huge flood to kill everybody because he wasn't happy with us? Sure sounds like a sensible dude who loves his creation!
The sick jerk who told Abraham to kill his son just to see how loyal he is?

I'll be honest here, I find the God of the Old Testament way scarier than that of the New Testament. :p
 
God's also not going to hold everyone accountable beyond what they could have known, nor is He going to force people to be in His presence, i.e. "Heaven" if they didn't want to be with Him in the first place.

People still have freedom of choice.

I don't see "follow or be punished" as much of a choice. YMMV.
 
Wait, is this the same vengeful and nasty Jewish God who figured he'd just send a huge flood to kill everybody because he wasn't happy with us? Sure sounds like a sensible dude who loves his creation!

Oddly enough, the movie Noah probably is the best take I've seen on the story. According to the thoughts of quite a few scholars, the world at that stage had become so utterly corrupted that it couldn't be saved. The scenes in Tubal-Cain's camp in Noah perfectly capture how it's meant to be - no respect for life, or the environment, and no sense of right or wrong either. God (and Noah) decide that it must be destroyed in a somewhat harsh manner, and then through the film go from a journey of being all fire and brimstone to a more nuanced viewpoint. The humans that came before the Flood, and the humans that came after, are intended to be entirely different from a spiritual point of view.

Or Babylonian Jews just really dug the Epic of Gilgamesh and it made their way into the Torah...

The sick jerk who told Abraham to kill his son just to see how loyal he is?

The Akedah is God realizing that Abraham was kind of dumb, and needed to be taught how to live properly (and indeed become the first Jew). To Jews it's more like demonstration by a counter-example... I wouldn't call it sick, just showing the descendant of dumb idol-worshipers what not to do.

I'll be honest here, I find the God of the Old Testament way scarier than that of the New Testament. :p

Outside of Judaism, He does appear scary... but there's also a few thousand years of rabbinic debate and discussion that give a somewhat more nuanced picture...
 
Wait, is this the same vengeful and nasty Jewish God who figured he'd just send a huge flood to kill everybody because he wasn't happy with us? Sure sounds like a sensible dude who loves his creation!
The sick jerk who told Abraham to kill his son just to see how loyal he is?

I'll be honest here, I find the God of the Old Testament way scarier than that of the New Testament. :p
The best I can say about the story of Abraham and Isaac is that I struggle with it. The worst I can say is that, as a person who has PTSD from having been assaulted by someone with a knife, it totally freaks me out. A rabbi told me that she believes that, if God was testing Abraham, Abraham failed the test. I'm not sure what to make of that, but I certainly like it better than the usual interpretations! Would love to hear what @FlyingLemons has to say about it.
 
@FlyingLemons Sorry if my post seemed flippant by the way, wasn't meant that way. I appreciate the answer, I don't know enough about Judaism.
I do still believe there's something positive to be said about what the New Testament added in terms of the importance of love and giving dignity to excluded groups.
 
Judaism has always provided me with greater insight in to my faith. I like the added perspective.

Sorry if I didn't answer everyone's questions to satisfaction.
 
Yes, there's lots positive about what the New Testament says about "love and giving dignity to excluded groups", but what I've been discovering recently is how much of that actually comes straight from the Old Testament / Tanakh. I always knew that, vaguely, but not enough to have fully appreciated it.
 
Yes, there's lots positive about what the New Testament says about "love and giving dignity to excluded groups", but what I've been discovering recently is how much of that actually comes straight from the Old Testament / Tanakh. I always knew that, vaguely, but not enough to have fully appreciated it.
Indeed. I recently (within the past year or so-that's recent, right?) read a great commentary on the Akedah (The Binding of Issac) and how it illustrates different facets of God and his relationship with man.
 
Judaism has always provided me with greater insight in to my faith. I like the added perspective.

Sorry if I didn't answer everyone's questions to satisfaction.
Thank you for answering mine. I tried not to seem combative, and I know sometimes it feels that way when someone digs into something that is so personal for you, so thank you for taking the time to answer.
 
@Emilia - It's fine! One of the things about the West is that "Judeo-Christian" culture generally puts a lot more emphasis on the "Christian" rather than the "Judeo", which is often regarded automatically as an obsolete preamble to the "real" Christian religion. The Jewish interpretation is often far less known than the Christian one, so I'm not surprised if anyone outside the faith isn't really that familiar with it.

The best I can say about the story of Abraham and Isaac is that I struggle with it. The worst I can say is that, as a person who has PTSD from having been assaulted by someone with a knife, it totally freaks me out.

Sorry to hear that.

A rabbi told me that she believes that, if God was testing Abraham, Abraham failed the test. I'm not sure what to make of that, but I certainly like it better than the usual interpretations! Would love to hear what @FlyingLemons has to say about it.

As for the Akedah (binding), like many things in Judaism, there's no one canonical interpretation. However, a lot of rabbis regard the incident as being indicative of the world being a work in progress rather than being a creation ruined by sin. The Noachide commandments established after the Flood weren't working entirely, as although Abraham had the right monotheistic idea, his practice of that idea was still basically identical to that of idol worshipers who practised child sacrifice. Some view it as a test, but others view God allowing it to happen up to a point before stopping it at the last second as a learning incident, to ram home to Abraham that no, He is not Moloch or any of the other false idols that Abraham is familiar with - He is the real deal, and that the practise of idol worshipers don't fly.

Abraham and indeed mankind was still pretty dumb, and after having tried floods and destroying things and setting up new rules, God let Abraham do that in order to try showing humans how to do right again - this time with Jews and ultimately the Law of Moses. The way I've always viewed it is as part of an evolution in how humans perceive God - starting with a rather primitive servant/master relationship such as Noah had (Noah never questions), evolving through Abraham (idol worshiper, but starts to question God at Sodom and Gomorrah) and finally through to Moses, when God reveals himself as yod-hey-vah-hey, the Eternal/Hashem/Lord and declares mankind partners in the creation of the world, rather than merely just servants. Letting people do dumb things, and correcting that behavior when it occurs, is part of that. Humans learn, and God learns as well.
 
...Some view it as a test, but others view God allowing it to happen up to a point before stopping it at the last second as a learning incident, to ram home to Abraham that no, He is not Moloch or any of the other false idols that Abraham is familiar with - He is the real deal, and that the practise of idol worshipers don't fly.

Abraham and indeed mankind was still pretty dumb, and after having tried floods and destroying things and setting up new rules, God let Abraham do that in order to try showing humans how to do right again - this time with Jews and ultimately the Law of Moses. The way I've always viewed it is as part of an evolution in how humans perceive God - starting with a rather primitive servant/master relationship such as Noah had (Noah never questions), evolving through Abraham (idol worshiper, but starts to question God at Sodom and Gomorrah) and finally through to Moses, when God reveals himself as yod-hey-vah-hey, the Eternal/Hashem/Lord and declares mankind partners in the creation of the world, rather than merely just servants. Letting people do dumb things, and correcting that behavior when it occurs, is part of that. Humans learn, and God learns as well.

"to ram home to Abraham" No pun intended, I'm sure. ;)

Seriously, I can buy God's allowing it to happen up to a point better than I can buy it being a test. But even that bothers me, because it allows Isaac to be traumatized for the sake of teaching his father a lesson. I understand that there have been midrashim written about the affect on Isaac, but I haven't gone in search of them yet.

How I want to interpret the story is that what got written down was Abraham's total misunderstanding of what God wanted.
 
@Emilia - It's fine! One of the things about the West is that "Judeo-Christian" culture generally puts a lot more emphasis on the "Christian" rather than the "Judeo", which is often regarded automatically as an obsolete preamble to the "real" Christian religion. The Jewish interpretation is often far less known than the Christian one, so I'm not surprised if anyone outside the faith isn't really that familiar with it.



Sorry to hear that.



As for the Akedah (binding), like many things in Judaism, there's no one canonical interpretation. However, a lot of rabbis regard the incident as being indicative of the world being a work in progress rather than being a creation ruined by sin. The Noachide commandments established after the Flood weren't working entirely, as although Abraham had the right monotheistic idea, his practice of that idea was still basically identical to that of idol worshipers who practised child sacrifice. Some view it as a test, but others view God allowing it to happen up to a point before stopping it at the last second as a learning incident, to ram home to Abraham that no, He is not Moloch or any of the other false idols that Abraham is familiar with - He is the real deal, and that the practise of idol worshipers don't fly.

Abraham and indeed mankind was still pretty dumb, and after having tried floods and destroying things and setting up new rules, God let Abraham do that in order to try showing humans how to do right again - this time with Jews and ultimately the Law of Moses. The way I've always viewed it is as part of an evolution in how humans perceive God - starting with a rather primitive servant/master relationship such as Noah had (Noah never questions), evolving through Abraham (idol worshiper, but starts to question God at Sodom and Gomorrah) and finally through to Moses, when God reveals himself as yod-hey-vah-hey, the Eternal/Hashem/Lord and declares mankind partners in the creation of the world, rather than merely just servants. Letting people do dumb things, and correcting that behavior when it occurs, is part of that. Humans learn, and God learns as well.
See, it seems like with Judaism, God's more like a "hey, kids, I'm new at this thing, too, so we're kind of in it together" kind of supreme being who is running things, whereas in modern Christianity, God is already flawless, perfect, and don't you dare contradict him or else. As an atheist, I no longer believe in the likely existence of any supreme being or beings of a supernatural bent (I say this because I consider Natalie Portman a supreme being in her own right), but I can at least sympathize and respect the notion that there is a lovable, forgiving God who has faults, who screws up sometimes, but is really trying to do right by the people he or she created. It would at least explain a few things among various religions.

What I'm saying is that Judaism seems to interpret God as Judd Hirsch. Just sayin'.
 
@fireproof78

I like your story idea.

It made me think of all the awkward and difficult questions I would ask.

If God is god of the whole universe and judges mankind what about non humans? Does the judgement of God fall on non humans elsewhere in the universe if they had not had the Bible or was God able to project Jesus on every world where sentient beings lived?

Wouldn't that be just dandy hey?
 
Thank you for answering mine. I tried not to seem combative, and I know sometimes it feels that way when someone digs into something that is so personal for you, so thank you for taking the time to answer.
Truly sorry that I couldn't say more, but your perspective was extremely enlightening to me, and I appreciate it very much.
@fireproof78

I like your story idea.

It made me think of all the awkward and difficult questions I would ask.

If God is god of the whole universe and judges mankind what about non humans? Does the judgement of God fall on non humans elsewhere in the universe if they had not had the Bible or was God able to project Jesus on every world where sentient beings lived?

Wouldn't that be just dandy hey?
It's an interesting concept, and one that I have gone back and forth with, as I develop the alien species and their worldview, and the like. I get part of my inspiration from Tolkien, and part from Brandon Sanderson, among several others. It's been about ten years since I started it, so it might take a while ;)
 
Truly sorry that I couldn't say more, but your perspective was extremely enlightening to me, and I appreciate it very much.

It's an interesting concept, and one that I have gone back and forth with, as I develop the alien species and their worldview, and the like. I get part of my inspiration from Tolkien, and part from Brandon Sanderson, among several others. It's been about ten years since I started it, so it might take a while ;)


I do believe in other life.

But going with this if god is in fact real then Jesus on Earth was a projection of God or an aspect or part of God on Earth. If the god being is literally omnipresent and exists everywhere maybe that being projected that part on other worlds at the same time, giving rise to other forms of the same religion.
 
I do believe in other life.

But going with this if god is in fact real then Jesus on Earth was a projection of God or an aspect or part of God on Earth. If the god being is literally omnipresent and exists everywhere maybe that being projected that part on other worlds at the same time, giving rise to other forms of the same religion.
That's an interesting thought, and I had not considered it. Thank you for the comments :)
 
But going with this if god is in fact real then Jesus on Earth was a projection of God or an aspect or part of God on Earth. If the god being is literally omnipresent and exists everywhere maybe that being projected that part on other worlds at the same time, giving rise to other forms of the same religion.
"At the same time" doesn't work in Special Relativity -- there is no universal time frame with which to synchronise. Events that appear to be simultaneous in one frame of reference might appear not to be so when viewed from another frame of reference. Also, it's extremely unlikely that all other alien civilisations are at the same stage of development as humans. Perhaps a Jesus-like projection (an avatar?) "pops up" when required to steer ethical development.

"Aspect or part of God" -- presumably the Holy Spirit but what about the Father? I've never really understood why the doctrine of the Trinity became so widely adopted in Christianity -- it isn't explicitly formulated as such in the New Testament but seems to be a theological add-on to knock Gnosticism, Arianism etc. on the head in favour of Homoousion and the Nicene Creed.
 
"At the same time" doesn't work in Special Relativity -- there is no universal time frame with which to synchronise. Events that appear to be simultaneous in one frame of reference might appear not to be so when viewed from another frame of reference. Also, it's extremely unlikely that all other alien civilisations are at the same stage of development as humans. Perhaps a Jesus-like projection (an avatar?) "pops up" when required to steer ethical development.

"Aspect or part of God" -- presumably the Holy Spirit but what about the Father? I've never really understood why the doctrine of the Trinity became so widely adopted in Christianity -- it isn't explicitly formulated as such in the New Testament but seems to be a theological add-on to knock Gnosticism, Arianism etc. on the head in favour of Homoousion and the Nicene Creed.


Blame the RCC they created this notion of the holy trinity Father, son, and holy ghost all as part of the one thing, and yet separate.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top