Yeah, great to have that confirmed! Funny those "experts" we used to see around here who told us how Hollywood works and that it HAD to be in the Kelvin universe. Ha!
It's funny how people read "it's a prequel" and mistranslate that as "it will be faithful to the continuity of the old Trek shows."
Prequel means before the others. It's not a guarantee of faithfulness.What's the diff?
Yeah, so instead of a show that takes place in the Kelvin universe, we're getting a show that takes place in the prime universe but will look nothing like TOS. I'd be curious to know which option you think is better.
I don't expect or mind that it doesn't look exactly like TOS. And, I'm a huge TOS fan. I *am* glad that it is a direct prequel to TOS. So, I'm good.Yeah, so instead of a show that takes place in the Kelvin universe, we're getting a show that takes place in the prime universe but will look nothing like TOS. I'd be curious to know which option you think is better.
If that twitter photo from Frakes is of the DIS set, it looks like a modern take on the TOS aesthetic, which I'm totally fine with.
That would explain the TNG style of it. The Orville looks like it is Seth McFarlane's homage to TNG era trek.That photo was from the set of The Orville.
Why is Mr. Sullivan reassuring fans that the show will be a prequel? He should be reassuring fans that the show will even air.
That would explain the TNG style of it. The Orville looks like it is Seth McFarlane's homage to TNG era trek.
How so?What an unnecessary--and arguably irresponsible--thing to say.
I have no idea who Ted Sullivan is, but this doesn't imbue with faith he has any idea what he's doing.
At best it's nothing more than tawdry pandering. At worst, it promotes a false expectation that's only setting the show up to fail.How so?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.