Okay. I have just been told I am incorrect thinking ax productions & industry studios are two UNconnected things. Got it. I'm wrong. And that the studio production area has no AC. (I also remember it isn't fully sound proofed)
Okay. Here's where I started:
1. landlordDanny has forgiven the balance of the lease and keeps industry studios & its website.
1.a. the studio production area has zero AC.
1.b. the sound proofing is not yet completed.
1.c. defendantGarth is allowed to film there At Cost. (aprx $500 a day ballpark?)
2. ax 'productions' is vacating the studio at the end of the month and is considering:
A) moving out of state
B) moving elsewhere within the area
C) just moving the set(s) to a storage facility.
D) and propwox too? (<-hasn't been mentioned as far as I've heard)
E) editing equipment too? (<-hasn't been mentioned as far as I've heard)
Which meannnnnnsss..... What? (Regarding the 'ownership' of ax productions & industry std)
So I have these puzzle pieces:
- --"Danny, will be taking over the facility" ('taking over' does not necessarily indicate a change of ownership)
- --"Danny will keep the Industry Studios name, website " ('possibly' 'suggests' a change of ownership?)
- --"and even [keep] some of the personnel for on-site management." (keeps some of the personnel to manage the place?)..... What personnel? defendantGarth's? That is what the wording implies. Otherwise if anything was said at all about on-site management, and industry std belonged to landlordDanny, it would be worded 'providing his own personnel for on-site management.'
Speculative conclusion:
defendantGarth is retaining ownership of industry std.
ax productions is vacating. ax productions consists of sets, furniture, editing equipment, computers.
- --no known statement that furniture needs to vacate.
- --no known statement that furniture belong to ind std.
- --no known statement that editing equipment needs to vacate.
- --no known statement that the computers need to vacate.
- --no known statement that prpwx needs to vacate.
- --loud and clear statement that the set(s) must vacate the premises.
Working with theory that if the furniture, editing equipment, & computers needed to vacate this would have been said loud and clear.
Speculative conclusion:
Only the set(s) must vacate the premises.
Quandry:
Why does defendantGarth retain ownership of industry std?
Why are only the sets needing storage?
Why is defendantGarth providing some of the on-site management?
Speculative conclusion:
This isn't a real move. This is removing the sets from the studio floor.
Working with the the theory that nothing is being moved out but the sets.
Speculative conclusion:
Sets need to move out to finish the work needed to start renting the studio; installing AC & completing soundproofing. Hence the 'Warp Speed' indicator.
Quandry:
If this isn't a real move and defendantGarth still owns the studio why would landlordDanny forgive the balance on the lease?
Speculative conclusion:
Circles back to Mr. B, landlordD, and defendantG have formed some kind of unpublicized partnership and are gearing up to open for business as soon as the AC and soundproofing are in place! And defendantGarth isn't heading out for Georgia anytime soon.
--defendantGarth brings to the partnership deal our studio, our furnishings, and our equipment.
--landlordDanny brings to the partnership deal maybe two months of no rental income.
--Mr. B is bringing the bookings of cash paying clients to the deal.
Sounds like a plan to me!
I have no speculations at all regarding what the heck is going on with the 'help us figure out how & where to move' thing defendantGarth has going on.

A distraction?
And somebody's going to be paying to install the AC. Mr.B? landlordD? Donations to the IGG?
Ditto with the soundproofing.

This was fun.