• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starfleet is a Space Navy (military fleet)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aren't we overlooking the fact that the two known aspects of the FNP are that it can be entered after high school, and operates ancient sailing ships?

All the speculation on Memory Alpha appears utter bullshit. This is not a military organization at all, but some sort of a reenactor group that serves the interests of history buffs like Tom Paris - or then the Sea Scouts of the 24th century, but open to the more mature connoiseurs as well.

Timo Saloniemi

"In the FNP, you can sail a planets seas.
In the FNP, counsellor will put your mind at ease."

With heartfelt apologies to all.......................I just couldn't resist it!!!!
 
Especially like the episodes where they "explore" the holosuites.

The Corbomite Maneuver, we saw the Enterprise's crew engaged in repeated battle drills.
25r165i.jpg


When have we seen a Starfleet officer in a romantic or sexual relationship with a Starfleet enlisted?Those are not ranks, they are job descriptions.Cruise ship have holding cells, not brigs, and in the article you linked to, it said this; "If you've done something illegal, you can expect to be turned over to local law enforcement." Starfleet has it's own internal military justice and prison system.Iron Eagle was a awesome movie ... the sequel was terrible.From the TAS episode The Ambergris Element, we learn that the Enterprise does carry boats.

Almost every Holosuite episode in Ds9 is related to the other ongoing pieces, or relates to some other aspect of the the ongoing narratives...our man Bashir is a fun runaround, but also a character piece for Bashir and Garak, which ties into the ongoing 'learning about the culture' for the cardassians and to an extent Bajor. Where wasn't the runabout coming back from? Are there other scenes in that episode? Just picking an example that on the surface isn't to do with the whole ongoing stuff, but ultimately is.
Voyager is one hundred percent not to do with the military, by definition, however, depending on your take on the original mission you can flip it a bit. Once we are in the Delta Quadrant, it's by definition mostly exploration...it's taken hours to post this cos of typing bug so am gonna quit while I am ahead. Remember the opening narration.
 
"In the FNP, you can sail a planets seas.
In the FNP, counsellor will put your mind at ease."

With heartfelt apologies to all.......................I just couldn't resist it!!!!

So...Tuvok, Chakotay and Paris are in a tribute band? Who would be the fourth?
 
That's because Iron Eagle, while somewhat entertaining from a "Oh cool, F-16 dogfight action" standpoint, is a terrible, terrible movie.

And "Coming of Age" is a terrible, terrible episode. What is your point? It's OK to use a kid stealing a shuttle as evidence Starfleet is paramilitary, but it's not OK to use "Iron Eagle" to counteract your point? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If a kid stealing hardware is a sign an organization is paramilitary and not military, then the Air Force is a paramilitary organization and not military.
 
It might be of interest that in the US, The Constitution doesn't require a standing army, only a standing navy. The founders saw it as essential to protect the function of commerce, maintain prices, protect from piracy, et cetera. The Navy is tasked with exploration, charting new trade routes, and settling foreign disputes. When an aircraft carrier is sent to an area where conflict is arising, it's presence can sometimes be enough. In the U.S. Navy, these are called "away teams." When the Enterprise D is sent to settle a dispute, they are projecting power. Like Dad coming home to settle a conflict between two warring siblings.

In Wartime, Navies organize into fleets of extremely powerful, high tech defense forces. They will battle with other navies, attack land based installations from a distance, and bring ground troops on transports.

I suppose an army is only needed when your adversaries have one, and the threat of war exists. It seems the Federation has finally learned how to expand as a benign empire without falling into the trap of a constant expansion of State Power over its citizenry. The Federation lasts for at least a thousand years. I wonder what it would look like in the far future.
 
It might be of interest that in the US, The Constitution doesn't require a standing army, only a standing navy. The founders saw it as essential to protect the function of commerce, maintain prices, protect from piracy, et cetera. The Navy is tasked with exploration, charting new trade routes, and settling foreign disputes. When an aircraft carrier is sent to an area where conflict is arising, it's presence can sometimes be enough. In the U.S. Navy, these are called "away teams." When the Enterprise D is sent to settle a dispute, they are projecting power. Like Dad coming home to settle a conflict between two warring siblings.

In Wartime, Navies organize into fleets of extremely powerful, high tech defense forces. They will battle with other navies, attack land based installations from a distance, and bring ground troops on transports.

I suppose an army is only needed when your adversaries have one, and the threat of war exists. It seems the Federation has finally learned how to expand as a benign empire without falling into the trap of a constant expansion of State Power over its citizenry. The Federation lasts for at least a thousand years. I wonder what it would look like in the far future.

That is one of the interesting things about the Federation. No need for trade...no need for resources..why does it expand? And gunboat diplomacy often avoided.
 
I think the main problem with this topic is that it too often tries to make Starfleet fit some kind of 20th or 21st Century definition, and that's just not possible. Starfleet is a unique organization that is not a direct descendant of any contemporary military or civilian agency. Trying to shoe-horn it into being U.S. Navy in space is just lazy, frankly. Starfleet is just Starfleet.
 
That is one of the interesting things about the Federation. No need for trade...no need for resources..why does it expand? And gunboat diplomacy often avoided.
No need for resources? Isn't the Federation some kind of resource based utopia? Surely there is commerce/trade. Sisko's girlfriend is a freighter captain. As for money, that's a different thread, but there is money sometimes. Sisko pays quark 5 Bars of GPL as a bribe to not press charges against that forger who stabbed him. What is gunboat diplomacy?
 
If memory serves, Kassidy Yates' freighter was registered under contract to the Petarians, a race implied to be unaffiliated with the Federation. She was later sub-contracted to conduct freighting runs for the Bajorans, another non-Federation (at the time) group.
 
So she was a federation citizen running freight for a foreign nation, making stops at Federation planets.
 
Making stops largely at non-Federation worlds and stations. Deep Space Nine may have been operated by Starfleet, but it was sovereign Bajoran territory in terms of law and economics.
 
Yeah, okay. My interpretation of that may be off. I interpreted the above (and also data from the US DOG not being eligible to be part of SOCOM) as meaning that legally it's a military but other than when transfered to DoN controlled it is not a military in practice but rather a law enforcement, regulatory and rescue organisation.

It's okay. Likely, the confusion comes from the fact that the USCG, at the times of war, is put under the command of the U.S. Navy. However, even at the times of peace, it's still a military service.

The fun thing is, just a century ago, only one of them was. Never mind that the Air Force didn't exist yet - the Navy did, but it explicitly was not Military, because Military meant Army exclusively, and specifically with the purpose of excluding the Navy. Which is sort of understandable historically, because standing Armies have been hotly debated issues, yet a Navy cannot help but be a standing one.

Heck, there were still books being written in the 1950s where "military" meant Army and Army alone, and carefully set it apart from Navy.

Yes, that is an outdated definition. In modern usage, navy used alone always denotes a military fleet. Even the U.S. Navy's official website uses the .mil extension, which stands for military. Star Trek is supposed to take place in the "future" of a fictional universe.
 
At least do the whole song. ;)
I was quite tempted by the mention of Oceanography in the lyrics, but both ran out of lunchtime and didnt want to get barred from here!! But given that, maybe FNP is solely an exploratory arm of the Federation and (just like Starfleet ??) not even slightly millitary?
 
So...Tuvok, Chakotay and Paris are in a tribute band? Who would be the fourth?
Gowron would be good as the biker dude. Then again any Klingon would, and without needing to change costume!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top