• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Trek's lowest moment

What are you talking about?

Trip wasn't raped. It was a consensual activity, and the alien stated she did not know she could impregnate a human. There was no reason not to believe her.

In my eyes, it was like telling someone younger than you it was just a game and not a sexual experience. It was grossly irresponsible.
 
For me it has to be Data and Joe Piscopo making spastic noises on the holodeck in the name of 'comedy' in "The Outrageous Okuna".

Are there worse moments in Trek? Did anyone actually find that in any way entertaining?
DS9's "The Emperors New Cloak". We're subjected to Mirror Kira's cold blooded killing of another Ferengi and juvenile lesbian innuedos between Mirror Kira and Mirror Leeta just because the writers thought it would be cool.
 
When Star Trek: Nemesis (which I liked enough, BTW) failed to premier in the #1 spot at the box office. For me, that was the moment in the franchise where everything changed.
 
Just to re iterate some earlier posts, "Code of Honour" pretty much takes the biscuit for me, alongside some pretty dreadful moments throughout TOS S3
 
The appalling rape "joke" at the end of The Enemy Within - bad enough on its own, but even worse in the context of what happened to Whitney.
 
Like much of real life...........

I refer you to Uhura in ST:IV.
I watch Star Trek not Eastenders (or the OC or Sunset Beach or whatever soap opera passes for real life in th US) or Housewives of Atlanta (having sat through much of that as it's on the room....it's actually not bad, though seems to take place in some kind of pocket universe.....)
 
I refer you to Uhura in ST:IV.
I watch Star Trek not Eastenders (or the OC or Sunset Beach or whatever soap opera passes for real life in th US) or Housewives of Atlanta (having sat through much of that as it's on the room....it's actually not bad, though seems to take place in some kind of pocket universe.....)
You can think you're above it but at the heart of Trek is humanity, our strengths AND weaknesses.......Utopia may be the goal but we haven't reached it by the 23rd century and likely never will. Plus it would kinda be a boring show with no conflict or inner struggle.
 
The point of Trek isn't here and now it's the not here and not now but the here and now we want to be at.

I'm not interested in a Trek dominated by Greyish protagonists and a generally dark atmosphere.

And I'm sure as heck not interested in grimdark Warhammer 40K.
 
You can think you're above it but at the heart of Trek is humanity, our strengths AND weaknesses.......Utopia may be the goal but we haven't reached it by the 23rd century and likely never will. Plus it would kinda be a boring show with no conflict or inner struggle.

Trek has some very specific frameworks in place for how we got there....it's a rare post post-apocalyptic dystopia utopia. Always was. There's stuff round the edges, but even TOS is portrayed as repeatedly 'better than now' including the humans.
 
The point of Trek is to explore the human condition, both the good and the bad. TNG lost sight of that with its sanctimonious and un-relateable human characters..

Kor

I and many others never had that issue. Then you get the work of Michael Piller, and things like The Drumhead or The Offspring, or many of the other episodes.... maybe it's because a lot of TV , particularly imported shows from the US, is already alien to me, but I don't see the issue. Never have. And ideals are a good thing to have...even Ds9 never loses those. (Anyone else having keyboard issues on here when typing from an iPad? This has taken me minutes of the keyboard slowing or freezing or reloaded...and I get a big blank spot at the top of every page.)
Grimdark I see not realistic... it's a sop, and cynical.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top