Only by a segment of fandom. It was never stated in canon, and since no one ever disproved the intent, once they were shown to have casings, the majority of fans responded with "Yeah, that makes sense."
The galley.Apart from the bowling alley, was there any interior space mentioned but not shown?
It would have been nice to see the warp core itself at some point in TOS (a la TNG/VOY/etc.) but I understand why that never happened.
I thought this was the TOS-era equivalent of what would later be called a warp core: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/File:Constitution_original_engineering2.jpg
The story I heard was that they didn't want to spring for an Engineering room set so Roddenberry (re)wrote Encounter at Farpoint to include Picard touring the Engineering room, making that set necessary. I heard the reason he did this was because they didn't have enough money initially to build a shuttle for TOS and, as a result, poor Sulu had to spend that night in the cold in Enemy Within.
TNG's Engineering is the same set as the one from the TOS films, isn't it?
That can't be. I heard somewhere that they saved money on Star Trek VI by using the TNG engine room, which was noticeably different than previous refit engineering sets. Correct me if I'm mixed up.
One thing I've wondered is, how far back do those things go? I know they don't go as far back as they appear because of the forced perspective. Anyone know? Just a little niggling thing I've always wondered about!I thought this was the TOS-era equivalent of what would later be called a warp core: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/File:Constitution_original_engineering2.jpg
Kor
^I remember being surprised by that as well.
It would have been nice to see the warp core itself at some point in TOS (a la TNG/VOY/etc.) but I understand why that never happened.
I thought this was the TOS-era equivalent of what would later be called a warp core: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/File:Constitution_original_engineering2.jpg
Kor
About 15 feet or so. I visited James Cawley's reproductions of the Desilu TOS sets at Ticonderoga, NY this past October, and you can get a feel for how large they really were there. I wrote about my trip there here. You can see in one of my photos the engineering section shot from a 3/4 view which gives you a better idea of the scale.One thing I've wondered is, how far back do those things go? I know they don't go as far back as they appear because of the forced perspective. Anyone know? Just a little niggling thing I've always wondered about!
Thanks, I thought they were much shorter than that. I would love visit that recreation too. Unfortunately, I don't think they're doing those visits right now.About 15 feet or so. I visited James Cawley's reproductions of the Desilu TOS sets at Ticonderoga, NY this past October, and you can get a feel for how large they really were there. I wrote about my trip there here. You can see in one of my photos the engineering section shot from a 3/4 view which gives you a better idea of the scale.
I know it's a seasonal thing, so yeah, they may still be closed for the winter. I saw on Facebook that they're selling tickets for tours conducted by Mike and Denise Okuda, though. I'd definitely get in on that if you're in the area. You'll probably see a few sets like McCoy's decompression chamber and the Jefferies Tube that weren't 100% complete when I went there. You can get information on what they're currently planning at http://startrektour.com/. I highly recommend it.Thanks, I thought they were much shorter than that. I would love visit that recreation too. Unfortunately, I don't think they're doing those visits right now.
Thank you for sharing your visit with photos in Star Trek Boldly Goes To...Ticonderoga, N.Y.?I know it's a seasonal thing, so yeah, they may still be closed for the winter. I saw on Facebook that they're selling tickets for tours conducted by Mike and Denise Okuda, though. I'd definitely get in on that if you're in the area. You'll probably see a few sets like McCoy's decompression chamber and the Jefferies Tube that weren't 100% complete when I went there. You can get information on what they're currently planning at http://startrektour.com/. I highly recommend it.
Had a chance to read about your visit. Sounds great! Thanks for sharing! That was a great write up!I know it's a seasonal thing, so yeah, they may still be closed for the winter. I saw on Facebook that they're selling tickets for tours conducted by Mike and Denise Okuda, though. I'd definitely get in on that if you're in the area. You'll probably see a few sets like McCoy's decompression chamber and the Jefferies Tube that weren't 100% complete when I went there. You can get information on what they're currently planning at http://startrektour.com/. I highly recommend it.
Cool! I hope you have as great a time as I did!They've started selling tickets again and I'm definitely going! Unfortunately the tickets with Koenig are sold out!
From what I recall, the set that we saw in TMP had first been constructed for New Voyages in 75, and then it was upgraded for theatrical use, and then appeard in Star Trek II. Star Trek III you had that one section of Scotty in engineering right at the start of the movie saying that everything was almost fixed, but that didn't show the entire set, just a small wall that James Doohan was in front of for the one scene, otherwise engineering wasn't in the movie. Star Trek IV didn't feature the Enterprise's engineering. The set was then repurposed for TNG, with parts removed, repainted and rearranged. One thing retained from the TMP set in, essentialy, it's TMP appearance was the elevator that you see Picard and Worf riding down in Encounter At Farpoint that Kirk had earlier ridden in TMP. Star Trek V had Scotty roaming all over the Enterprise-A due to the deteriorated condition of that ship, so main engineering was not seen, although where Scotty bumps his head, as far as I can tell, was meant to be somewhere under main engineering. By the time Star Trek VI came around and an engineering set was needed (not to mention corridors), it was cheaper and easier to redress the TNG sets. And then later the set was modified to be Voyager's main engineering, and as I recall was finally struck and torn down in 2001 at the end of Voyager.That can't be. I heard somewhere that they saved money on Star Trek VI by using the TNG engine room, which was noticeably different than previous refit engineering sets. Correct me if I'm mixed up.
Apart from the bowling alley, was there any interior space mentioned but not shown? We might have benefited from seeing a cargo hold, or more probably a supplies hold; naval adventures always get a kick out of "The gunpowder's gotten all wet!", "Somebody stole the salted beef!" and "Now if the pirates knew what we have sitting on this shelf"!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.