Star Trek - A blast from the past villain on a vengeance trip. Vulcan is blown up. Our heroes have to fight so the villain can get his comeuppance.
Shouldn't that be a "blast from the future"...

Star Trek - A blast from the past villain on a vengeance trip. Vulcan is blown up. Our heroes have to fight so the villain can get his comeuppance.
Yet people showed up for Batman vs. Superman and Suicide Squad. Both high on spectacle, short on everything else.
You may have a point with the characters thing. This Halloween I went as Captain Kirk and no one, neither the kids nor their parents, could identify me by name. I got a "Star Trek Man" and a "Picard," inexplicably. Kirk/Spock/McCoy are iconic, but not like Batman and Superman, unfortunately. Granted, right now superheroes are having a moment.Again: Characters are freakin' Batman and Superman! Also, we have Ben Affleck, Will Smith, Margot Robbie. That's characters for starters. Spectacle should be obvious. Even you don't disagree. Story? Meh. Wasn't good. Might be a reason both of them somewhat underperformed.
Were those movies "good" in any sense? Depends on personal taste (I didn't like them). But out of the "characters, spectacle, story"-triumvirat, they had the two most important ones. Big time. The new Trek movies stumble on all of them (at least from a shallow outside non-Trekkie perspective).
Characters were a draw for the first one (09 - the first time we see iconic characters on the screen for decades). Those characters ween't new anymore for Into Darkness, but it had Benedict Cumberbatch to make up for it a little. Beyond? Had nothing more to offer than the first two. Spectacle? By-the-numbers blockbuster mayhem, for all of them. Nothing special or to compete with the top-movies, but mostly o.k. Story? The weakest part of the first two movies. Basically a so-so on overall accounts, and that's a pretty good summation on how they ended up at the box office.
You may have a point with the characters thing. This Halloween I went as Captain Kirk and no one, neither the kids nor their parents, could identify me by name. I got a "Star Trek Man" and a "Picard," inexplicably. Kirk/Spock/McCoy are iconic, but not like Batman and Superman, unfortunately. Granted, right now superheroes are having a moment.
I wonder if a starship under water drove the purists as batty as it did in Star Trek Into Darkness?![]()
If Edison had a better crew, he would've escaped Altamid on his own.
I'm still madly in love with the Yorktown.
OK I am probably no paying attention at all but in the scene where Kirk goes to separate the neck from the saucer, Who floats off inside the neck when that window slides up to shield Uhura? Did she crash land in the neck of the ship?
Uhura and Krall were still in the neck and I assumed they escaped from it inside one of the drone ships
I watched this again on Tuesday night in my home theater. It was my first time seeing it since the summer when it was in theaters.
I liked it the first time, but I've liked it MUCH more with repeated viewings. It really is, TO ME, one of the best Star Trek movies...easily the best since First Contact. Yes, it was smaller in scale (like Insurrection, which I didn't like), but the characters were dead-on and the "feel" of TOS was captured much better this time out. It was a fun, interesting, warm film that engaged the hearts and the smarts. I am really disappointed that it didn't perform better. I think a lot of people missed out on a really wonderful and rewarding experience.
Im somewhere inbetween these twoJust re-watched for the first time since seeing it in the theatres. Gotta say (though it pains me to) -- BORING! In retrospect, this seems like the poor cousin to the first two movies. Lower budget, less interesting story, least impact. Yeah, I get that it captures the essence of TOS, and there are gratuitous references -- exploration, rogue SF captain, etc... -- but it just doesn't work as a stand-alone film. As many have said, this was a call-back to TOS episodes. Very true. But as a motion picture, not gonna fly.
It's sort of reminiscent of the comparison of STIII to TMP. But I think this one is worse. One kept us interested through a struggle to save our favorite character. The other is just meh. The story just isn't compelling.
I do hope, somehow, there's a Star Trek 4, and I do hope it's more cinematic in its reach. Since we only get these once every 3-4 years, let's make them count. This ain't a weekly TV series any more.
Im somewhere inbetween these two
Just re-watched for the first time since seeing it in the theatres. Gotta say (though it pains me to) -- BORING! In retrospect, this seems like the poor cousin to the first two movies. Lower budget, less interesting story, least impact.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.