Hooray, clickbait.
Also, no Klingon captain. It would not fit the time line.
Why not? What assumptions are you making?Hooray, clickbait.
Also, no Klingon captain. It would not fit the time line.
That the Klingon captain is going to be an ongoing antagonist.Why not? What assumptions are you making?
There weren't Klingons 10 years before TOS?That the Klingon captain is going to be an ongoing antagonist.
Nope.There weren't Klingons 10 years before TOS?
Well alright then.Nope.
That article is more about Fuller being ousted with a reference to the kind of characters the show is rumoured to feature. Still, as others have said, that was already revealed back in the summer.The Hollywood Reporter is also reporting the same news
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/bryan-fuller-as-star-trek-discovery-showrunner-941587
Just because the Federation and the Empire are enemies ten years later doesn't mean they are during the time of Discovery.Also, no Klingon captain. It would not fit the time line.
Good point. I had not thought of that.Just because the Federation and the Empire are enemies ten years later doesn't mean they are during the time of Discovery.
So you had thought the Federation and Empire were enemies during the time of Discovery... but "a Klingon antagonist would not fit the timeline"?Good point. I had not thought of that.
They don't know what they're talking about.So you had thought the Federation and Empire were enemies during the time of Discovery... but "a Klingon antagonist would not fit the timeline"?
Klingon captain doesn't necessarily mean a Starfleet Klingon captain.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.