Memory Alpha for starters. Along with all the people Captain of the USS Azerof just listed. That may not make it canon, but I think non-canon evidence ranks above no evidence at all.By whom?
Memory Alpha for starters. Along with all the people Captain of the USS Azerof just listed. That may not make it canon, but I think non-canon evidence ranks above no evidence at all.By whom?
Memory Alpha for starters. Along with all the people Captain of the USS Azerof just listed. That may not make it canon, but I think non-canon evidence ranks above no evidence at all.
I'll take your word over DS9...
So when they create a model specifically to represent the Daedalus class, use that model on the show and then tell you via word of god that it's the Daedalus class, it's obvious that they intend for you to know it's the Daedalus class and so it should be considered as such.
How many of those someones wrote and produced any Star Trek TV shows or films? Not all sources are created equal. Even Okuda admits that his Encyclopedia is conjecture and not canon. And since Dennis actually worked on TNG as a writer, he might have more insight into the mechanics of these things than you or I.In this case…
*Someone = CBS, StarTrek.Com, Michael Okuda, Star Trek Encyclopedia, Greg Jein, Doug Drexler, Pocket Books, Star Trek Official Starship Collection, Memory Alpha, Memory Beta, Ex-Astris-Scientia…
What word? The entire problem is that the ship has never been referenced as "Daedalus" class. Not on TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT or any of the thirteen films. That's what canon is, what we see on screen. That way, we're all using the same frame of reference.
Even Okuda admits that his Encyclopedia is conjecture and not canon.
How many of those someones wrote and produced any Star Trek TV shows or films?
Not all sources are created equal. Even Okuda admits that his Encyclopedia is conjecture and not canon.
And since Dennis actually worked on TNG as a writer, he might have more insight into the mechanics of these things than you or I.
No one is saying you can't consider it "Daedalus" class (I actually do). But it isn't "canon", because nothing on-screen connects the name with the model.
Nope. They own the IP. The actual writing and producing was done by people not a corporation. The stuff on their site is just being regurgitated from other non-canon sources. Repetition doesn't make it canon.Oh, I don't know, perhaps CBS!!!
I don't. My primary sources are visual and textual from the shows and movies. startrek.com and Memory Alpha are flawed sources IMO and are to be taken with a grain of salt. Especially MA which is fan created and edited.I find it highly hypocritical when we reference him and his work for other things (e.g. the length of the JJprise) but we dismiss it a source when we don't agree with it. The same goes with startrek.com and Memory Alpha.
I do. Because the writers and producers are the driving forces behind the shows. Take your "Botany Bay" example. The name is mentioned in the script and the model is identified by that name through dialog. The producers "signed off" on both. So that makes that ship design canon. The model seen in Sisko's office has never been stated on screen to be of the Daedalus class. The Daedalus class has never been seen on screen.As you and I perhaps. As opposed to Michael Okuda, Doug Drexler and Greg Jein though? I don't think so.
The entire problem is that the ship has never been referenced as "Daedalus" class. Not on TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT or any of the thirteen films. That's what canon is, what we see on screen. That way, we're all using the same frame of reference.
Take your "Botany Bay" example. The name is mentioned in the script and the model is identified by that name through dialog. The model seen in Sisko's office has never been stated on screen to be of the Daedalus class. The Daedalus class has never been seen on screen.
The name "Akira class" has never been mentioned or shown or referenced as such on screen "on TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT or any of the thirteen films". So according to your logic the "Akira" class name is not canon and the Akira ships belong to an unknown ship class.
The name "Akira class" has never been mentioned or shown or referenced as such on screen "on TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT or any of the thirteen films". So according to your logic the "Akira" class name is not canon and the Akira ships belong to an unknown ship class.
What Bob saidYes. You and I can choose to accept that designation for that type of ship, but that doesn't make it "canon".
George and Winona were long accepted as the names for Kirk's parents. The names weren't canon until Star Trek (2009). Hikaru was long accepted as Sulu's first name. The name wasn't canon until The Undiscovered Country.
Enterprise had an ECS cargo ship called Horizon, which had the "Chicago Mobs of the 20's" book as set decoration. I'd take that over earlier conjecture that Horizon was Daedalus-class.The Horizon is generally considered to be Daedalus class. I don't know if this was ever backed up by dialogue. Probably not.
Enterprise had an ECS cargo ship called Horizon, which had the "Chicago Mobs of the 20's" book as set decoration. I'd take that over earlier conjecture that Horizon was Daedalus-class.
Well again, in the Enterprise novels, it is literally Travis' parents ship that visits and drops off the book. Which is acutally in Travis' quarters (a replica of the original TOS prop) in the episode he goes back to visit, his family left his copy behind.
Gangs rather than Mobs.Didn't the book have the wrong name though?
A USS Essex was a known Daedalus-class vessel as that was the ship named as such by Data research.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.