Part of that comes from the very police state style society that was constructed as well. Step out of line and they come and take you away with the Tal Shiar.
Part of that comes from the very police state style society that was constructed as well. Step out of line and they come and take you away with the Tal Shiar.
A state which is known to close its borders for periods of 50-100 years probably doesn't prioritize tourism.They must not get many tourists there.
A state which is known to close its borders for periods of 50-100 years probably doesn't prioritize tourism.
I am not sure. The technologically advanced are usually the ones who win wars.
Not always. And Trek actually has precedent, I believe - didn't the Klingons take a lot of their technology from the advanced alien race that conquered them in the past (who the Klingons then ultimately rose up against and drove out of the alpha quadrant)?
Not according to the series or the movies.
The part about the Klingons first getting warp drive from the Hur'q may have only been added in secondary sources, but the fact that the Klingons defeated them wasn't.
I know it was said, in the Sword Of Kahless (I believe). But it's really hard to believe that a bunch of medieval barbarians, that spent most of their time fighting each other, like we were ourselves in medieval times, would be able to defeat people with such advanced technology. Who do you think would win if a battalion of modern soldiers was attacked by a bunch of people on horses in suits of armor and chainmail, armed with lances?
I don't recall the exact wording, but I believe the Hur'q were said to have ruled the Klingons for a significant period of time. Klingon insurgents no doubt would have taken every opportunity to use the advanced enemy technology, so the difference would not be as huge as you suggest. And when the difference in technology levels isn't ridiculously massive, there are plenty of other factors that can swing the balance (see WW2, Vietnam, etc).
WW2: They had the same weapons.
Vietnam: They had the same kind of weaponry, maybe less expensive but that was compensated by their will to fight. And the lack of popularity of the war on our side.
The German bit off more than they could chew and that was their ultimate undoing. Had they consolidated their position they could have lasted much longer. Fortunately for us they didn't.German technology was undeniably superior in WW2. But it ultimately didn't matter because of various different reasons (primarily because the Germans were massively outproduced).
And the Viet Cong had basically no air force - a technological inferiority that's pretty extreme in and of itself.
Sometimes you need to shake up the status quo, destroying one of the Federation's major enemies and powers in the alpha quadrant does that.
They have about 30 enemies, probably more than 50 because of Voyager, they got rid of the most boring ones homeworld, not killed off their race or their fleet.
Except what they did in Trek XI was, "in the late 24th century Romulus is destroyed. And now, here's a rebooted mid-23rd century in which Romulus still exists." They didn't shake up a status quo, they just included a plot detail which was irrelevant to the over all storyline of the movie.Sometimes you need to shake up the status quo, destroying one of the Federation's major enemies and powers in the alpha quadrant does that.
The federation (foolishly) probably pumped in massive resources to prop up the Klingons. The Klingons were then spiteful for the outside help.Note that the Klingons were supposed to decay after the explosion of Praxis.
Save for how it impacted Nero.Except what they did in Trek XI was, "in the late 24th century Romulus is destroyed. And now, here's a rebooted mid-23rd century in which Romulus still exists." They didn't shake up a status quo, they just included a plot detail which was irrelevant to the over all storyline of the movie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.