So Kirk wouldn't be an example of: "Those who can't, teach" then.
Precisely, though I'm sure there were plenty of those types hanging around the Academy.
So Kirk wouldn't be an example of: "Those who can't, teach" then.
This makes a lot of sense. We can also see this quality with Ensign Chekov, Lt. Kevin Riley, and Lt. Bailey in TOS. Glenn Greenberg wrote a nice story in the Marvel Comics Star Trek: The Untold Voyages #5 (which took place between TMP and TWOK) where at the end Kirk takes the job at the Academy specifically to counter the myths about him that are already starting to crop up. He sees the need for it afterMorrow called Kirk his "best officer", so it stands to reason he was an effective--albeit unhappy--flag officer. I like the idea of his being the Academy Commandant, which actually makes a lot of sense. Cadets and junior officers would surely look up to someone like Kirk because of his exploits while commanding the Enterprise, and Kirk has always seemed to me the sort who doesn't mind taking youngsters under his wing (e.g., Ensign Garrovick).
I agree. Most of the Chronology assumptions I disagree with are in the TOS era, mostly because I feel like several of them are at cross-purposes with the original creator intent (McCoy was in his 30s during TOS? Really?).
Precisely, though I'm sure there were plenty of those types hanging around the Academy.
I had an idea so I made a trip to a book shop to have a look. The recently published Autobiography of James T Kirk has this to say on the matters post TMP (this is a pretty rough précis): Kirk says, and I quote, 'after our second 5YM ended', Kirk then decides to resign from Starfleet rather than be promoted again, he travels and moves onto a farm before eventually going back prior to WOK! I know it's not strictly canon but where does the official autobiography fit?
Seemed to have worked for Spock and McCoy seeing where each of them were at the beginning of TMP.Does this mean that you can resign from Starfleet and be reintegrated at will?
Not to mention Wesley (as we can see him in Nemesis in Starfleet uniform.).Seemed to have worked for Spock and McCoy seeing where each of them were at the beginning of TMP.
Not to mention Wesley (as we can see him in Nemesis in Starfleet uniform.).
And Kirk himself with Antonia. Didn't Sisko take a leave for awhile? Seems to be a pretty common thing.
You're right about Sisko. How did I forget about that? They weren't even sure he was ever coming back. (He took his baseball with him)
Speaking of weird flag officer/ captain duty switches, Sisko's a brand new Captain commanding entire fleets of starships like an Admiral.
True! Maybe it's because of his status as emissary of the prophets that gives him some clout.... After all that's a unique position among the Bajorans.
Among the Bajorans being the key phrase - it was meaningless to the Starfleet and Federation personnel. Considering the general attitude towards religion in Trek I can only imagine Sisko's Messianic predilections are a big joke everywhere not called DS9.
Yeah.Speaking of weird flag officer/ captain duty switches, Sisko's a brand new Captain commanding entire fleets of starships like an Admiral.
Yeah.
If they'd taken a more realistic tack post TMP, Admiral Kirk might have commanded his own formation out on the frontier, like say a flotilla or squadron, including one or two capital ships like the Enterprise, which itself would likely have been the flagship, and maybe a few science vessels and other support craft. Heck, Sulu and maybe one or two of the other TOS bridge crew could have been captains of their own ships in it. That could have shown realistic progression in ranks and Kirk doing what he does best, being in command while facing the unknown, while still keeping the other familiar faces in the action.
That's true. But I think they need him in order to keep good relations with the Bajoran people. Imagine, to the Bajorans he's even more important than their Kai.
Yeah.
If they'd taken a more realistic tack post TMP, Admiral Kirk might have commanded his own formation out on the frontier, like say a flotilla or squadron, including one or two capital ships like the Enterprise, which itself would likely have been the flagship, and maybe a few science vessels and other support craft. Heck, Sulu and maybe one or two of the other TOS bridge crew could have been captains of their own ships in it. That could have shown realistic progression in ranks and Kirk doing what he does best, being in command while facing the unknown, while still keeping the other familiar faces in the action.
True, but I can't imagine that would be why they'd put fleets of ships under the command of one newly promoted Captain. Seems to me to be just another glitch is Star Treks rankings. If they'd started Sisko as a Captain and then promoted him to Admiral it would have fit better in canon (weren't all deep space station commanders Commodore's in TOS?) and make more sense why he was in charge of the fleets.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.