Of course. I'm not even saying that prequels are always bad. I'd love for HBO to make a Dunk and Egg prequel to Game of Thrones and that's nothing except for filling in the gaps. I'd love to know what happened at the Tragedy of Summerhall.I think all that depends on how good the writers are.
The thing with Star Trek is that we haven't seen what's happening "now" since 2002 (not counting a brief glimpse in the 2009 film). We last left the 24th century with a devastated Cardassian Union, a weakened Klingon Empire, a Romulan Star Empire with no home world, and a Voyager crew who returned home after seven years lost in the Delta Quadrant. I do care about what happens next and I'm not going to find out in a prequel.
Screw canon...I just hope it's good
Seems like there are a whole lot of decision makers in the cast, two Admirals, a Klingon captain, possibly the Discovery captain. Things could always take a turn like The West Wing did. Where someone that wasn't anticipated breaks out.
Who's to say the 'food dispensers' in TOS weren't some type of replicator? The delivery of the food seemed fairly instantaneous to me.
Star Trek Discovery of a MacGuffin? That sounds worse than a war.If a Klingon ship is involved, along with Discovery, it seems like it would almost be a competition to get at something.
NBC blows cats. Their coverage sucks. Too little sports, too many "heartwarming stories."
Plus - I'd like to see competitors from other countries, not just the US. And dump beach volleyball. That's the kind of thing that people play when drunk and young, not an Olympic sport (in my opinion anyhow).
The stories happened, but we are not viewing them though the lens of a 1960's era idea of what things should look like.
Why in the world would it make sense to have tech/design/sets etc. that are different than already established within the canon of the universe?
Why should it be forever limited to 60's TV? Well it wasn't, it did after all continue in a lot of movies. But why do we have to keep going back there so many times anyway? How about something new.
Enterprise's problem wasn't that it messed with the canon, it's that it did so for no good reason. Did the show really need a Ferengi episode?
Though it's not a lens, as demonstrated by Trials and Tribblations. Star Trek was a depiction of the events that happened at the time. It depicted the culture o Starfleet and humans at the time. It depicted the technology of that time. To betray that with modern sensibilities is to contradict what know happened in that time. This resulting in inconsistency story telling.
While I agree Klingons didn't really add anything to Enterprise, their presence didn't really contradict canon that much. Okay, so first contact wasn't what I would consider "disastrous" but the TNG writer who wrote that line said he felt what was in Broken Bow is in line with what he wrote, so there we are.Or Klingons?
Practicalities of make-up and on-stage time, perhaps.I'm also extremely relieved that the lead is human and not an alien.
I would hope that having a more universally accessible protagonist would be of higher priority than those. I mean, I actually believe that is probably the case.Practicalities of make-up and on-stage time, perhaps.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.