• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News coming 8/10?

I think all that depends on how good the writers are.
Of course. I'm not even saying that prequels are always bad. I'd love for HBO to make a Dunk and Egg prequel to Game of Thrones and that's nothing except for filling in the gaps. I'd love to know what happened at the Tragedy of Summerhall.

The thing with Star Trek is that we haven't seen what's happening "now" since 2002 (not counting a brief glimpse in the 2009 film). We last left the 24th century with a devastated Cardassian Union, a weakened Klingon Empire, a Romulan Star Empire with no home world, and a Voyager crew who returned home after seven years lost in the Delta Quadrant. I do care about what happens next and I'm not going to find out in a prequel.

But, to end on a positive note, I do love the low tech era of the 23rd century and the wild west feel to the universe that was lost in the 24th century era. I think there's a lot of potential to write some very interesting stories in that time period.
 
The thing with Star Trek is that we haven't seen what's happening "now" since 2002 (not counting a brief glimpse in the 2009 film). We last left the 24th century with a devastated Cardassian Union, a weakened Klingon Empire, a Romulan Star Empire with no home world, and a Voyager crew who returned home after seven years lost in the Delta Quadrant. I do care about what happens next and I'm not going to find out in a prequel.

Those were things that I honestly never cared about. Besides, the novels should go on unaffected by Discovery.
 
Seems like there are a whole lot of decision makers in the cast, two Admirals, a Klingon captain, possibly the Discovery captain. Things could always take a turn like The West Wing did. Where someone that wasn't anticipated breaks out.

Maybe the main character is an admiral's aide de camp and we're going to see what it's like for her and her boss to deal with a pushy captain who doesn't want to obey orders.
 
Who's to say the 'food dispensers' in TOS weren't some type of replicator? The delivery of the food seemed fairly instantaneous to me.

Yeah, when the Enterprise was trapped in 1967 and they had the Air Force SGT in the transporter room, Kyle stuck in a data card and dialled up chicken soup, which appeared just about as fast as Picard's Earl Grey in TNG. I'd say food replicators on at least a limited basis were a reality in TOS, although in other references the ship still had a galley as well. It was probably a transitional period of sorts.
 
NBC blows cats. Their coverage sucks. Too little sports, too many "heartwarming stories."

Plus - I'd like to see competitors from other countries, not just the US. And dump beach volleyball. That's the kind of thing that people play when drunk and young, not an Olympic sport (in my opinion anyhow).

I agree with the young part, but drunk?
 
The stories happened, but we are not viewing them though the lens of a 1960's era idea of what things should look like.

Though it's not a lens, as demonstrated by Trials and Tribblations. Star Trek was a depiction of the events that happened at the time. It depicted the culture o Starfleet and humans at the time. It depicted the technology of that time. To betray that with modern sensibilities is to contradict what know happened in that time. This resulting in inconsistency story telling.
 
Why in the world would it make sense to have tech/design/sets etc. that are different than already established within the canon of the universe?

Why should it be forever limited to 60's TV? Well it wasn't, it did after all continue in a lot of movies. But why do we have to keep going back there so many times anyway? How about something new.

It would make sense as its not the 1960's anymore. Making it look like it was made in the 1960's is simply silly to me and always will be. Its limiting and does nothing but make it look foolish.

I do agree we should be going post VOY, not backward.
 
Though it's not a lens, as demonstrated by Trials and Tribblations. Star Trek was a depiction of the events that happened at the time. It depicted the culture o Starfleet and humans at the time. It depicted the technology of that time. To betray that with modern sensibilities is to contradict what know happened in that time. This resulting in inconsistency story telling.

Yes, that episode looked really stupid and made trek look silly and child like. It is though a lens of the 1960's and acting like its not is just childish.
 
Or Klingons?
While I agree Klingons didn't really add anything to Enterprise, their presence didn't really contradict canon that much. Okay, so first contact wasn't what I would consider "disastrous" but the TNG writer who wrote that line said he felt what was in Broken Bow is in line with what he wrote, so there we are.
 
The Enterprise visited Talos IV with Pike commanding in 2254, then again with Kirk thirteen years later in 2267, two years after taking command. This puts Discovery one year before Talos IV if Discovery is ten years prior to TOS. Eh, probably nothing.
 
I don't see anything to cause me any concern. Sounds good.

My only surprise is that it really is in the Prime Universe proper, and not pre-Narada incursion. I look forward to the ways in which the Prime Universe look and feel are updated for today's audience. There is a tremendous amount that could be really interesting there. Dare we hope to see a modern spin on the "Cage"-era bridge? I think that could be super-cool.

The lead not being the captain is also promising. I'm also extremely relieved that the lead is human and not an alien.
 
Close Pre-TOS Yay! We're still in the good aesthetic era!

Turtlenecks, gogo boots, and big walls of flashy lights galore.

Gimme that good old fashioned Raygun Gothic plz.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top