Spoilers DS9: Rules of Accusation by Paula M. Block and Terry J. Erdmann Review Thread

[Christopher]

^So because you never looked up "alliteration" in the dictionary, it's somehow my fault for being confused by your misuse? If people don't understand what you're saying, it's not an attack against you to ask for clarification. Communication goes two ways, and that means if the speaker and the listener are using a word in two different ways, thereby keeping them from understanding each other, then they need to communicate that lack of understanding in order to resolve it. That's not about showing off or putting anyone down, it's just part of how conversation works.

(Also, you should look up "uppity" while you're at it, because that means pretty much the opposite of what you seem to intend.)

 

[DimesDan]

Oh the irony.

 

[vegaslover62]

If not uppity, then snobby, which you're acting like again.

 

[trampledamage]

If not uppity, then snobby, which you're acting like again.

vegaslover62 please stop attacking Christopher personally. Get back to discussing the book please.

 

[vegaslover62]

Trampledamage, I have a legitimate reason to be angry. A "professional" author DOXXED me. It wasn't Christopher, but I'll bet Christopher proofread the document and condoned it by not preventing it.

 

[trampledamage]

Trampledamage, I have a legitimate reason to be angry. A "professional" author DOXXED me. It wasn't Christopher, but I'll bet Christopher proofread the document and condoned it by not preventing it.

That crosses the line - I'm issuing you with an infraction. To accuse Christopher of being involved in a doxxing attack is completely ludicrious, it is also against the rules of this forum.

Any other comments about this issue can be sent to me via the personal messaging system and should not be discussed in this thread any more.

Like I said before - back to discussing the book please.

 

[vegaslover62]

Hasn't even heard the details yet, and he already calls it "ludicrous." Underinformed, much?

 

[trampledamage]

I asked you to put any further discussion into a PM - if you continue to discuss this issue within this thread, I will have to issue you with another infraction.

Get back to discussing the book.

 

[vegaslover62]

An "infraction" is a slap on the wrist compared to what the actual author's doxxing of me led to. I'm talking LITERAL CRIME.

 

[trampledamage]

A warning has been issued for the above post.

The book, people, the book!

 

[Jinn]

The book, people, the book!

Errr. This was a great book wasn't it? [I'M just speculating, as I haven't read it yet]

 

[Avro Arrow]

Corinthian leather!

 

[T'Bonz]

Forgive the off-topic posting, but posting in here so I can find this thread again if needs be. [/vague]

Carry on.

 

[trash80]

Enjoyable book, we need a few more (relatively) inconsequential stories amid all the big arcs and galaxy changing events.

 

[JLP_1984]

I agree with trash80. It feels to me that a long time has occurred since 'What You Leave Behind' that I'm becoming less interested in the current characters - some more stories to fill in the gaps between "galaxy changing events" would be welcome.

One short story I would enjoy reading is how Zek survived the attack on Risa as per Destiny Trilogy (can you do spoilers in spoilers?)

 

[kktwin]

A very entertaining read! Thumbs up.