• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek Discovery

Yes, because there are always rigidly acceptable rules for futuristic, fictional technology, otherwise it just won't work!! Must have our narrow preconceptions met.
I don't think the implication was that there are specific rules that must be applied to futuristic fictional starships. It seems the poster simply disliked the proportions -- which is a valid opinion.
 
I can’t understand why people are complaining about the poor CGI as this is clearly just some test footage. We have to remember that they have not even started to film yet, let alone started to work on post production. Nearer the time they will add more layers of textures to the CGI model to make it look more realistic.
 
Beauty is definitely subjective. But shared subjectivity is an approximation of objectivity. If we polled a THOUSAND people and asked them if they thought this ship was an attractive design, I'd be surprised if over 10% thought it was.
More like 19%, but yeah, the majority of people who took part in this survey don't seem to like the design. Although the reactions here seem to be more like 50/50.

I can’t understand why people are complaining about the poor CGI as this is clearly just some test footage.
I guess because a lot of people – me included – would rather not get any footage than this excuse of a teaser. :shrug:
 
Beauty is definitely subjective. But shared subjectivity is an approximation of objectivity. If we polled a THOUSAND people and asked them if they thought this ship was an attractive design, I'd be surprised if over 10% thought it was.

It is butt ugly to the bulk of humanity, distracting ugly, the kind and scale of ugly that might even detract from the show because of the eye pollution we'll be subjected to.

You're confusing consensus with objectivity. It's akin to saying that because a significant portion of the US population believes in angels, that means they're likely to be objectively real. Sorry, that's not how it works.
 
It is butt ugly to the bulk of humanity, distracting ugly, the kind and scale of ugly that might even detract from the show because of the eye pollution we'll be subjected to.
i love these kind of comments. the design of the ship is so awful and distracting and ugly that no sane person could like it. Discovery will forever ruin Star Trek. no one will ever watch the series and it will be a stain on the name of Trek.

please spare me the hyperbole.
 
i love these kind of comments. the design of the ship is so awful and distracting and ugly that no sane person could like it. Discovery will forever ruin Star Trek. no one will ever watch the series and it will be a stain on the name of Trek.

please spare me the hyperbole.

Exactly. That was Enterprise.
 
Although the reactions here seem to be more like 50/50.
Really? I haven't been keeping a tally, but I was under the impression that I was in a small minority who actually like it.

Maybe somebody should start a poll here.
 
I think I started to like it at around the 48th replay.
:wtf:

The more I think about it, I have to applaud the new team for taking this approach. They could have played it safe and given us a beautiful shiny new ship but would that really have been any different than any previous series? There's a reason Discovery looks like a mutt and not a purebred and I'm looking forward to her story. The challenge for the writers is to win over all of those bashing this ship, to create a storyline and tell it in such a manner that it will leave people speechless...in a good way! I bet a year from now, some of those calling this ship hideous will do a 180 and proclaim Discovery to be the best ship Trek has ever seen! Imagine it, wouldn't it be great to fall in love with Star Trek all over again? That's what I'm hoping for! :techman:
 
Its amazing how little it takes online to set people off...from Female Ghost Busters,a Gay Sulu or a test CGI shot of a Starship for a series that is still a year away form airing.
 
Looks fine to me. I'm ecstatic someone would take a chance on more Star Trek on TV for us. I even warmed to Enterprise after a period of time. Glad Star Trek is on the upswing again after the dark years of 2002-2004.
 
My guess is that this footage was rendered at a premature stage to wet the whistles of fans like us who are eager to get glimpses of the new show. It's not (relatively) difficult to produce photorealistic CGI of this sort of thing, so the final product will likely be more polished.

That being said, I don't care. The quality of the visual effects are far less important than other aspects of the show. If the producers' goal was to catch the attention of fans like me who care about Trek and its legacy, they totally succeeded. Riffing off of Phase 1 designs was brilliant because it speaks to the possibilities of Star Trek—and in Trek, possibility is everything.

In my subjective opinion, the NCC-1701 is not an elegant design. I find it clumsy, improbable and difficult to justify. It is also unbelievably iconic and beloved. Elegance isn't everything.

Which Star Trek ships didn't look clumsy, improbable, and difficult to justify? The designs are preposterous and make no sense regardless of whether they look cool.
 
The ship has grown on me after re-watching the video. For the life of me, though, I'm unable to shake the feeling that there is some sort of misdirection going on here. To show footage of a ship that screams a certain time frame and then say they won't say what era it is set because they want to tease us makes me think something is up.
 
I don't get it. That ship is gorgeous and looks like a bad ass mofo. Then again I've always thought all the Federation ships looked stupid (yet I still like some of them) and couldn't understand why someone would design something so weird.
 
You are aware that it's appeared in one film and at least one episode before, right?

Fully. However it's barely into view and you have to not be watching what's the center of the scene to even see it. This changes nothing of my point.
 
Beauty is definitely subjective. But shared subjectivity is an approximation of objectivity.

That is probably one of the most wrong things ever uttered, in any form, on any media, in the history of the universe.

Even if the entire population of the universe agrees with an opinion, it does not make it objective.
 
The ship has grown on me after re-watching the video. For the life of me, though, I'm unable to shake the feeling that there is some sort of misdirection going on here. To show footage of a ship that screams a certain time frame and then say they won't say what era it is set because they want to tease us makes me think something is up.

I wonder if Discovery could be a huge generational ship, one that was sent to another Galaxy as a sort of Noah's Ark to ensure that a portion of humanity survives? That's why it has an "industrial" look to it, it was built to survive for many years and maybe each season will have different crews as the originals die out and the children grow up and take over. Or maybe that's just a stupid idea, but one thing is for sure, it has to be something totally NEW. I don't see how any of the previous story lines can be made exciting again.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top