Is it 1701-A on the hull?Saw the movie.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It does look a lot like this. It was metallic and I liked that but I wish it was more of a departure from the original design. Perhaps it could have had swept back nacelle pylons.
Is it 1701-A on the hull?Saw the movie.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It does look a lot like this. It was metallic and I liked that but I wish it was more of a departure from the original design. Perhaps it could have had swept back nacelle pylons.
To me the 1701-A looked exactly like the slightly re-designed JJ-Prise...saw no real difference at all.
Have they gone for a darker tone for the outside?I LOVED the construction montage so much (how long were the crew waiting around Yorktown at the end?) But my first thought upon seeing the 1701-A was "ugly"
Now I know how everyone else felt in 2009.![]()
I have no problem with the nacelles being made a bit smaller, they were very much Double D's weren't they.Not sure about the hull colour, it seemed darker but that could have just been the indoor Yorktown drydock lighting.
The nacelles were smaller, cylindrical and had red nacelle caps. Very TOS. The proportions were closer to the classic movie version, after seeing the modern one for so long the engineering hull looked really awkward and bulky.
Not sure about the hull colour, it seemed darker but that could have just been the indoor Yorktown drydock lighting.
The nacelles were smaller, cylindrical and had red nacelle caps. The nacelles were further apart. Very TOS. The proportions were closer to the classic movie version, after seeing the modern one for so long the engineering hull looked really awkward and bulky.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.