IMO, the show feels more like a reboot when we change showrunners than Doctors. Granted, a new Doctor changes the dynamic among the characters moreso than changing companions does, but the tone and style of the show changes completely when the showrunners change. After all, there's more differences between the change from RTD to Moffat than there were from Eccleston to Tennant or Smith to Capaldi. Likewise, there's sure to be a similar case when we change from Moffat to Chibnall.The show reboots itself every time there's a new Doctor anyway; it's part of the format and ethos.
Eh? The classic era ran for 26 years, but regardless, why does Doctor Who "need a rest?" It's already taken three years of reduced programming (2009, 2012) or even no programming (2016). I'll admit, Moffat seems to be getting tired, but the solution there is to change the showrunner, which is happening, not pull the show completely.The show needs more of a rest than any sort of reboot IMO. After the 10th regular season airs I would like to see a handful of specials to say farewell to the current Doctor and this whole era of the franchise that began in 2005 and then let the show fall out of sight for at least several years before bringing it back.
Same is true for the classic era. From Verity Lambert to Barry Letts to Philip Hinchcliffe to John Nathan-Turner, each caused bigger changes than a new Doctor. Not perfect since Letts only worked with The Third Doctor and Nathan-Turner worked with four Doctors, but it was their styles that defined the different eras. With Nathan-Turner, I think whoever was the script editor also had significant influence on the era's style.IMO, the show feels more like a reboot when we change showrunners than Doctors. Granted, a new Doctor changes the dynamic among the characters moreso than changing companions does, but the tone and style of the show changes completely when the showrunners change. After all, there's more differences between the change from RTD to Moffat than there were from Eccleston to Tennant or Smith to Capaldi. Likewise, there's sure to be a similar case when we change from Moffat to Chibnall.
Definitely not a perfect comparison since this also coincided with a change of Doctors, but you could definitely see the difference in the show when Andrew Cartmel took over the show. IMO, those changes would still have happened even if Colin Baker had stayed on during the Cartmel years. Likewise, had Eric Saward stayed and Colin Baker still left and was replaced by Sylvester McCoy we would have had more of the same as we had from the Davison and C Baker years.With Nathan-Turner, I think whoever was the script editor also had significant influence on the era's style.
Kind of already happening anyway, we have Kate Stewart and Osgood in UNIT stories now as opposed to the Brigadier and Mike Yates or Sgt. Benton.All white male characters have one or both changed.
Isn't that basically the Virgin New Adventures?More sex.
And isn't that basically the RTD era?Louder music.
I'M IN!!! BRING IT ON!!!Britain doesn't do reboots. Evolution not revolution is our philosophy.
That said, a reboot in this decade would consist of the following:
The Doctor is a black lesbian who flies around the universe in a six foot tall iPhone. The opening episode features her breaking into Buckingham Palace with a sonic cricket bat to save the Queen from a Sontaran by shoving jelly babies into his probic vent, all set to grand orchestral music with fast panning shots and huge amounts of lens flare.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.