Six or seven more edits and this might be worth a responce... keep working on it, you'll get there!
I see what you're saying, but to be frank, I get incredible personal comfort from reconciling them.
And yes, it's apparently two seconds of the movie, matters not to anything, and it's even ambiguous at that. So, blame Pegg for "clarifying" it.
The problem is the importance and scope of the story is getting blown out of proportion. To that end, I regret the "two Sulus solution" in the real world because it lends credence (on the surface at least -- Quantum mumbo jumbo aside) to the idea that being gay is a choice, which is often the rationale for not granting gay people the same rights as non-gay people, and tends to go against the beliefs of most science. If this is the Sulu born before the Kelvin incident, then he's physiologically the same Sulu as Sulu in the Prime Universe. Of course, Pegg says that doesn't have to be now, at least I guess that's what he's saying. One Sulu must've carried the gene (or whatever) and the other didn't, I guess that's how he's rationalized it. He's essentially changed the Trek laws of physics once again. This time to placate Takei.
Anyway, this all went far deeper than Pegg probably ever intended. It's even got more legs and causing more buzz than blue warp nacelles did.
As a courtesy, he should've probably called Takei to see if he was OK with it before going ahead and "honoring" his character that way. Once again, we see what happens when we assume.
All Sulus are bisexual. If they want to be monogamous after marriage, they still need to select one partner, if that's making a choice.
Six or seven more edits and this will probably still sound like a needlessly smug response to a perfectly reasonable rebuttal of your post. But since we don't have time for all that, I'll just ask that you please refrain from making pointless and rude remarks like this again, and instead point out the alleged flaws in his argument or facts with evidence of your own.Six or seven more edits and this might be worth a responce... keep working on it, you'll get there!
I'm confused why Chekkov isn't in every episode of the original series, and resent whoever is sitting at navigation for daring not to be Chekov, for the 42 episodes that he's not there.
Rand is out of sight, out of mind. It's nice when she's there, but when she's not, no big.
(I just face palmed.)
In Search for Spock, Grace is billed as "Woman in Cafe".... Shit.
OMG!
20th Century Woman in Cafe.
Rand is a time traveller.
Rand is a time Agent.
Rand was monitoring Kirk for the 31st century.
... but was she pulled from her mission on Enterprise for becoming too close to Kirk, or not being close enough to Kirk?
I'd read that book.I'm confused why Chekkov isn't in every episode of the original series, and resent whoever is sitting at navigation for daring not to be Chekov, for the 42 episodes that he's not there.
Rand is out of sight, out of mind. It's nice when she's there, but when she's not, no big.
(I just face palmed.)
In Search for Spock, Grace is billed as "Woman in Cafe".... Shit.
OMG!
20th Century Woman in Cafe.
Rand is a time traveller.
Rand is a time Agent.
Rand was monitoring Kirk for the 31st century.
... but was she pulled from her mission on Enterprise for becoming too close to Kirk, or not being close enough to Kirk?
Chekov worked the night shift. Source, Enterprise: The First Adventure.
I like the point about first names. How do you play a character, when you don't even know their first name (assuming they have one, which by now we know they do, retroactively)? How are they really a character?
<==== not an actor
