There's still a window, if Kelvin happened early enough, and Sulu's conception happened late enough, to be born before December 31st 2233.
I was thinking of main characters, not extras without a name. Female extras are nice and all, but they don't do anywhere as much for female representation as main characters.Wait. The first female captain was the unnamed Captain of the Saratoga in The Voyage Home, before Berman.
Certainly you mean it is an improvement over the entirety of the franchise? Where there has been zero representation for fifty years.
I don't think they were intended to be permanent additions. I don't see what role Jaylah would play on the ship going forward. She's not Starfleet. So why would she be on the ship?
When was Winona killed?
You mean like it wasn't an issue in the 1950s?I will be happy when it is not an issue if a character is gay, lesbian, transgender, intersex, or queer. (Queer is used for those who are questioning their sexual identity.)
The truth is we should get both. Tokenism by having only one or two main female characters, often as love interests or mothers for main male characters, isn't really acceptable either. Uhura is great but her presence does not mean there should not be 50% female security officers.I was thinking of main characters, not extras without a name. Female extras are nice and all, but they don't do anywhere as much for female representation as main characters.
Like Riker and Troi.... obviously this tension was an important aspect of their relationship, and there is story payoff in it later on....
The truth is we should get both. Tokenism by having only one or two main female characters, often as love interests or mothers for main male characters, isn't really acceptable either. Uhura is great but her presence does not mean there should not be 50% female security officers.
So, any time any affection for anyone is shown by a main character, there has to be a story reason for it?
Enlisted vs. Officers.
12 week boot camp (Guess? It might not even be that.) vs. 4 year super-university.
Genius Citizen Soldiers vs. Cleaners, Security Guards and Specialists.
The officer to enlisted ratio in a modern army is 1:10.
100 officers yelling at a thousand enlisted seamen to keep a boat floating in a good direction.
Because of near magical automation in the future, "technology" seems to have reduced that ratio to 1:03 in most fields divisions except security, who still needs armed dangerous people to stand in front of millions of doorways across the Federation until you can really trust Holograms not to wink out during a power cut.
I can understand how you might want more female officers, but if you see a security squad that is all women, yes the squad is all women, but only one of those women is an officer, and the other 8 women are enlisted.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Choosing enlistment is fine.
It's still hard to get into the boot camp, hard to pass boot camp, and once you get the job, it'll most likely kill you. So it's sorta the same but with a much shorter turn around, and zero room for advancement, that the highest possible enlisted rank is still Junior to Harry Kim one day out of the academy.
Of course it's not just about that, it's also another dimension to the Spuhura narrative - about whether characters should be 'changed' in the reboot.I haven't read this thread, so I'm not sure what's going on outside of the first few pages (before Takei had his word on the matter), but I can't believe there's such a large argument over whether a character should, to put it in simple terms, like dick or pussy. Twenty pages or so of that shit. And it's not even just on TrekBBS, it's all over the internet.
This just feels so backwards and toxic. Who cares?
I don't think they were intended to be permanent additions. I don't see what role Jaylah would play on the ship going forward. She's not Starfleet. So why would she be on the ship?
Well, I have read the entire thread and I must say for the most part people are really postive and/or enthusiastic about Sulu being gay. Sure, there are two or three guys who are opposed, but the vast majority seems to love it. And I think that's amazing!I haven't read this thread, so I'm not sure what's going on outside of the first few pages (before Takei had his word on the matter), but I can't believe there's such a large argument over whether a character should, to put it in simple terms, like dick or pussy. Twenty pages or so of that shit. And it's not even just on TrekBBS, it's all over the internet.
This just feels so backwards and toxic. Who cares?
I suppose it's because you need a chain of command. If you have 300 ensigns on board, who outranks whom? It goes back to this notion of why Uhura never sat in the chair (in universe) when she is formerly a command track officer and has more bridge experience than most? The more officers you have the messier it gets.Considering how big the Federation population is and how relative few big exploration ships the Federation has, I didn't really find it so far fetch, that a crew would practically only consists out of officers. Isn't it kind of a dream job? And when you can choose from the best of the best, why settle for less?
Technically, she wasn't an extra, because she spoke.I was thinking of main characters, not extras without a name. Female extras are nice and all, but they don't do anywhere as much for female representation as main characters.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.