• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

HUGE Mr Sulu Spoiler

I think he means with "closeted" TOS Sulu. TOS Sulu never showed interest in men, although there were a lot of hot ones his age on the ship, not to mention hot alien men. All the other characters showed obvious interest in the opposite gender. The other guys had all female love interests and the women had male ones. Only he didn't show in 102 episodes and 6 older movies any interest in other men. So why not? Now Takei thinks he didn't, because Sulu was in the closet. He thinks that making new movie Sulu gay means also, that TOS Sulu was gay. After all ST09 wasn't really a clear reboot. Sulu's sexuality shouldn't have been affected at all by Nero. Nero only destroyed the Kelvin before Sulu was grown up. So with other words Takei thinks it is canon now, that TOS Sulu is gay. TOS Sulu didn't express it though ever, so Takei concludes he must have been in the closet. And a guy feeling the need to be in the closet in the 23th century, is for Takei against Gene's vision. At least that is how I understood Takei's reasoning. Maybe he says more about it in the future and it will become clearer, what he means.

Even if you decide that TOS Sulu was gay just like nuSulu, it would still not make sense for him to be showing interest in other men. He's married and committed to his partner.
 
Even if you decide that TOS Sulu was gay just like nuSulu, it would still not make sense for him to be showing interest in other men. He's married and committed to his partner.
Who we also never heard of or seen in all those numerous episodes and movies. And was Sulu already married back in TOS times to begin with? If memory alpha is right about Demora Sulu's birth year, she was born after the five year mission. No one has to agree with Takei, but I don't see so far a sign, that he doesn't understand what he is speaking about like you thought.

Me personally I don't really care if they turn a character gay, I think it was even long overdue. But I think using Sulu for it was a chicken move, just to create buzz. And the timing of the reveal just right before the worldwide movie release, is also a sign of that.

Sulu was the most minor main character in the last two movies. I think he got even less to do than Chekov overall. And he will likely get only one or two little scenes about it, which won't really affect the movie in other ways. So easy for some of the homophobic countries in the world to cut and still show the movie in the cinemas. And for the other countries it is unlikely that it will be too much for the homophobic science fiction lovers to repel them from Beyond. So a lot of buzz, while risking as little as possible.

There is also the confluence with the original Sulu actor being famously gay. I bet TPTB thought of it, too, when they chose Sulu. They likely thought that will increase the acceptance of it among the audience. I bet when they planned it they even speculated on Takei helping with positive publicity. I mean the first articles which came out stated, that Pegg and Lin intended it as a tribute to Takei. Only Takei didn't keep still like I guess they hoped or changed his mind from before. But even when Takei speaks negative about that decision, he still helps the movie with getting attention, which Pegg and Lin will have known.

A bold move would have been, if they would have taken a more prominent character or two and make him/them bi or gay. Spock and Uhura are in a relationship, but why not Kirk, McCoy and/or Scotty? And then give that character or those character a bit more screen time about it. Something more than a blink and you miss it moment, like I suspect we will get with Sulu.
 
Last edited:
McCoy had a wife and is still bitter about the divorce, Kirk is hetero/furry/player yadda yadda already. Scotty is pushing a charicature as it is.

That only leaves the two at the helm. And lets really not go down the route of bringing Carol back just to make her a lesbian after the Into Darkness underwear nerdrage.
 
That only leaves the two at the helm. And lets really not go down the route of bringing Carol back just to make her a lesbian after the Into Darkness underwear nerdrage.

I sort of want her and McCoy to get together in that timeline. Not pushing it but...hey. Why not?

I can't believe all this back and forth about this. We knew it was going to happen sooner or later...I was a bit surprised because I expecting to see it in the TV series first but whatever. It's done. All this talk about what Gene would have wanted and who and what Prime Sulu did or didn't do isn't going to change anything.

I'm still waiting for Starfleet's first Breen...patiently waiting .....
 
Let's be real: A lot of homophobes ARE hiding behind arguments of canonicity to oppose gay-Sulu despite having long ago accepted blue-eyed-Kirk and Caucasian-Khan. Not to say that everyone who is fixated on "staying true to the original Sulu" is homophobic, just that some are using that as a shield to hide their biases behind.
Oh come on. So basically some are homophobes and some aren't but since they have the same argument and we can't identity which is homophobic let's lump them together. Cheap way to nullify an argument.
 
McCoy had a wife and is still bitter about the divorce, Kirk is hetero/furry/player yadda yadda already. Scotty is pushing a charicature as it is.

That only leaves the two at the helm. And lets really not go down the route of bringing Carol back just to make her a lesbian after the Into Darkness underwear nerdrage.

I don't think that Scotty is a caricature, at least not more than any of the others characters. And even if he would be, that would have given them an opportunity to make him less so. Give him a personal life.

And time has passed since the last movie in the new universe. I think 2-3 years or something. Enough time to get over a divorce. And in McCoy's and Kirk's case, you obviously would make them bi and not gay. Having seen Kirk with women, doesn't mean that he didn't have sex with men off screen before. The same is true for McCoy. Hey, if they didn't want to create a new bi/gay character, like they said in interviews, Lin/Pegg could have even put Kirk and McCoy together. From friends to boyfriends. Or they could have added a friends with benefit phase between that. After all it can get lonely out there is space.

Either way any other choice would have been less cowardly. Sulu was really the most gutless choice. Even Chekov would have been bolder. Then they couldn't have sold it as a tribute to the original actor. And homophobes likely have also less problems with turning a character gay, which was played previously by a gay actor than with a character previously played by a straight actor. They are stupid that way. And with Russia's recent law against the promotion of homosexuality towards minors, and the movie is aimed not only at adults, but also teenagers, Russia's reaction would have been even more interesting with Chekov being gay.
 
It's exciting to see so much discussion over what has proven to be a two second scene with an arm around a guy who could well be his brother, cousin or best mate taking place in the first five minutes of the film. I can't wait to discuss the other 120-odd minutes with you all.
 
Wait...what?? A bare chested man who's sweating is gay???? Fencing is gay??? I wish this post made some..any kind of sense.

Neither of those things are gay, but I have to admit, seeing that scene as a wee gayling likely had a big part in making me the rice queen I am today. :lol:

We're talking about Sulu, the guy who orbital skydived onto an enemy platform and nearly singlehandedly took out the Romulans defending it with a sword? The Sulu who took command of the Enterprise and threatened Khan with orbital bombardment on the Klingon planet? In what way is there any concern about him being shown to be weak? And what does weakness have to do with femininity? And why are we instantly associating the character with pervasive negative stereotypes about gay men when we already have two movies of him not fulfilling those stereotypes? Do you think they're suddenly going to drastically alter the character into an offensive gay caricature out of the blue?

NuSulu is a great exception, and things are starting to turn around, but Hollywood does have a long history of, not necessarily feminizing, but de-masculinizing, usually by de-sexing and de-eroticizing, male Asian characters.
 
I remember the first time I found out some fans were just assholes. It was a letter to the editor of DC Comics (Bob Greenberger) that blasted the relationship shown between Scotty and Uhura in The Final Frontier.

It was sobering. Certain segments of fandom have never let me down since with their overreactions to changes in what they consider "normal". The bellyaching over Sulu is just more of the same.
 
It's exciting to see so much discussion over what has proven to be a two second scene with an arm around a guy who could well be his brother, cousin or best mate taking place in the first five minutes of the film. I can't wait to discuss the other 120-odd minutes with you all.

If we even see his significant other at all. It might just be the picture scene of his daughter and a mere mention of a husband. Easy to cut for certain countries. Those using dubbing might just turn his husband into his wife. And Paramount will be happy about it as they can still sell their movie in those countries this way.
 
I can't believe all the comments I'm seeing from people in social media saying, "Sulu can't be gay, he has a daughter."

Where do these people live? 19th-century Iowa?

Everyone knows that only men and women can have babies. The stork won't deliver to same-sex couples. Homophobic bastard! :eek:
 
We already have gay couples having children through, admittedly, very early fertility techniques. But give it 300 years and who knows what we'll be doing.
 
Oh come on. So basically some are homophobes and some aren't but since they have the same argument and we can't identity which is homophobic let's lump them together. Cheap way to nullify an argument.

Did I say, "let's lump the two together"? I said that homophobes are using this argument to hide behind and that's a fact. If they weren't, they wouldn't be so fixated on this one retcon while ignoring the 100 other retcons in nuTrek.
 
Yeah, I truly don't understand George's opposition. Saying that it's not what Roddenberry wanted in the 60's is pretty irrelevant considering the constraints he was under back then and the fact that times (and the fans) have changed. It's like opposing a new law because "it's not what George Washington would have wanted." He's not around anymore, we have to do what's right for the people of today.
2mtcrqv.jpg
 
Regardless of one's view on homosexuality this IS pandering. They are doing it just because of Takei's RL lifestyle choice, and even he said this is not what the character is. He told them not to, yet they do it anyway.....It is completely unnecessary.
 
Who we also never heard of or seen in all those numerous episodes and movies. And was Sulu already married back in TOS times to begin with?

We don't know, which is why they are free to make up his backstory.

Me personally I don't really care if they turn a character gay, I think it was even long overdue. But I think using Sulu for it was a chicken move, just to create buzz. And the timing of the reveal just right before the worldwide movie release, is also a sign of that.

Sulu was the most minor main character in the last two movies. I think he got even less to do than Chekov overall. And he will likely get only one or two little scenes about it, which won't really affect the movie in other ways. So easy for some of the homophobic countries in the world to cut and still show the movie in the cinemas. And for the other countries it is unlikely that it will be too much for the homophobic science fiction lovers to repel them from Beyond. So a lot of buzz, while risking as little as possible.

So they shouldn't make Sulu gay unless he has a major storyline that revolves around him being gay? Or they shouldn't make anybody gay because people will "buzz" about it? What are you advocating?

There is also the confluence with the original Sulu actor being famously gay. I bet TPTB thought of it, too, when they chose Sulu. They likely thought that will increase the acceptance of it among the audience. I bet when they planned it they even speculated on Takei helping with positive publicity. I mean the first articles which came out stated, that Pegg and Lin intended it as a tribute to Takei. Only Takei didn't keep still like I guess they hoped or changed his mind from before. But even when Takei speaks negative about that decision, he still helps the movie with getting attention, which Pegg and Lin will have known.

A bold move would have been, if they would have taken a more prominent character or two and make him/them bi or gay. Spock and Uhura are in a relationship, but why not Kirk, McCoy and/or Scotty? And then give that character or those character a bit more screen time about it. Something more than a blink and you miss it moment, like I suspect we will get with Sulu.

It doesn't have to be Kirk, McCoy, or Scotty to still constitute a significant choice, as is clear by the strong reactions within the fandom. And XIV is already confirmed; for all we know they may expand on Sulu's family in the future. .
 
Regardless of one's view on homosexuality this IS pandering. They are doing it just because of Takei's RL lifestyle choice, and even he said this is not what the character is. He told them not to, yet they do it anyway.....It is completely unnecessary.

Was it pandering to include a black female character and an Asian character in important positions on a 60's-era television show? Or was it boldly going where no show had gone before?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top