That's an interesting take on the subject. Do you have any facts to support this theory — which goes against all documented evidence to the contrary?![]()
Theiss bought white fabric for all the uniform tunics and dyed them. The light-green dye he selected had a yellow-gold component that came out under bright filming lights or in sunlight. It appeared green only when seen in less-bright light, such as ordinary indoor lighting.
The yellow look under bright lights was seen in person as well as on film. I think Kodak or Fuji would deny that there is some "film stock thing" that falsely makes green objects look gold on 35mm movie film. [I suspect Theiss thought it was a film effect because he saw the garments in his work space, which was not lit for filming. I doubt he spent much time on the set, if any.]
The real giveaway is here:
http://www.startrekpropauthority.com/2009/03/star-trek-exhibition-in-detroit.html
Flash bulb shows gold shirt, no-flash shows green shirt. [I don't think the captain's braids on the sleeves are the original article, and the zipper tab looks new, but the color dye in this garment does behave like the original shirts.]
So yeah, Theiss meant for the shirts to be green, and they were really green in dim light, but his chosen dye was also really yellow-gold under bright lights. There was nothing fake or false about the color, and therefore no reason for CBS Digital to bias the shirts back to green the way they did.
Obviously, the green wrap-around tunic and Kirk's dress uniform both got a darker green dye that never looked yellow.
Last edited: